Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 08-27-2010   #51
jcrutcher
Registered User
 
jcrutcher's Avatar
 
jcrutcher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,335
Just got back my first roll from my new R3M and nickel 50 mm 2.0. I'll post more photos later when I have more time to scan.
This shot was early evening shot wide open at 1/15, Porta 160VC processed at a lab and I scanned it with my Plustek 7600. I am very impressed with the first roll. Not only is it an excellent lens but the camera is awesome also.

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2010   #52
dogberryjr
[Pithy phrase]
 
dogberryjr's Avatar
 
dogberryjr is offline
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: WV, USA
Posts: 1,088
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by jcrutcher View Post
Just got back my first roll from my new R3M and nickel 50 mm 2.0. I'll post more photos later when I have more time to scan.
This shot was early evening shot wide open at 1/15, Porta 160VC processed at a lab and I scanned it with my Plustek 7600. I am very impressed with the first roll. Not only is it an excellent lens but the camera is awesome also.
Seems to have the slightest shift towards magenta.
__________________
M, LTM, FD, F, Film, Digital, MF . . . Jack of all, master of none.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2010   #53
JohnnyT
Registered User
 
JohnnyT is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Montreal
Posts: 131
Shiny!
__________________
I always wished to be invisible...

http://jonathantremblay.carbonmade.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2010   #54
jcrutcher
Registered User
 
jcrutcher's Avatar
 
jcrutcher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,335
now that you mention it I agree. not sure if it's the film, lens, camera or my novice scanning technique. I'll rescan with no adjustments and take another look. thanks!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-27-2010   #55
jcrutcher
Registered User
 
jcrutcher's Avatar
 
jcrutcher is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,335
A few more from the new lens.
http://

My wifes new car. 2011 Mustang GT California Special




I get a camera and lens she gets a car. what a deal!

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-02-2010   #56
Alnitak
Registered User
 
Alnitak is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 99
Just got this lens and I really like the rendering it has wide open. Just slightly soft with a nice roll-off to the bokeh. Very sharp stopped down.
Voigtländer 50mm f/2 Heliar Classic @ f/2 + Leica M9 by jhapeman, on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-03-2010   #57
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 11,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeissFan View Post
Nice lenses, for sure. I don't think that the Voigtlander lens names of yesterday (German Voigtlander) bear any resemblance to today's lenses of the same name.
At least for these two 50mm Heliars, the traditional Heliar optical formula is used: Here's the 50mm f/2 lens diagram:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Voigtlander 50 f2 Heliar diag.jpg (9.1 KB, 24 views)
File Type: jpg 091127-22.jpg (94.5 KB, 84 views)
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook

Last edited by Doug : 10-03-2010 at 21:52.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-08-2010   #58
sanmich
Registered User
 
sanmich's Avatar
 
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,123
I have a question concerning the 3.5:
What is the filter thread, and where can I find quality filters for it?
I know that it is 27mm diameter, but the pitch is not standard...
Also: the whole lens seems to be designed to be shot with the hood on.
Any experience without the hood?
__________________
Michael

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)

My site
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-08-2010   #59
haempe
negative guy
 
haempe is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 933
I use the lens usualy without hood.
I have a rowi skylight filter on it, as you say: false pitch, screws not complete in, but it hold on...


Quote:
Originally Posted by sanmich View Post
I have a question concerning the 3.5:
What is the filter thread, and where can I find quality filters for it?
I know that it is 27mm diameter, but the pitch is not standard...
Also: the whole lens seems to be designed to be shot with the hood on.
Any experience without the hood?
__________________
*
There is still a analogue world out there...

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-08-2010   #60
sanmich
Registered User
 
sanmich's Avatar
 
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,123
The more I search about this, the more frustrating it is.
About zero information but the clear knowledge that someone at Cosina, for an obscure reason (could this be some kind of a joke?)
decided that designing the Heliar 3.5 with a standard filter thread was not fun enough
__________________
Michael

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)

My site

Last edited by sanmich : 10-08-2010 at 11:16.
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-08-2010   #61
haempe
negative guy
 
haempe is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 933
And another nonsense: the hood is only ~1mm too wide for a A36 slip on filter...

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanmich View Post
The more I search about this, the more frustrating it is.
About zero information but the clear knowledge that someone at Cosina, for an obscure reason (could this be some kind of a joke?)
decided that designing the Heliar 3.5 with a standard filter thread was not fun enough
__________________
*
There is still a analogue world out there...

  Reply With Quote

Old 10-10-2010   #62
sanmich
Registered User
 
sanmich's Avatar
 
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,123
found this:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...94#post1440194

could the LTM and Nikon mount lenses share the same filter thread?
__________________
Michael

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)

My site
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2010   #63
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,893
Heliar 50/3.5 @ 4.0:



__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2010   #64
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,893
Heliar 50/2 @ 2.0:

__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2010   #65
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,893
Heliar 50/2@ 2.8:

__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-31-2010   #66
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 22,893
Heliar 50/2 @ 2.0:

__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

simo in florence
Old 11-01-2010   #67
robert blu
quiet photographer
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is online now
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 65
Posts: 2,832
simo in florence

m7 ; heliar 50mm F2 anniversary edition; kodak ektar 100 ; CS3 + LR

__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


my quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-01-2010   #68
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,112
I have both lenses. They definitely share the same hood, so I would guess that they also share the same filter thread (IIRC, 37mm if you use the hood thread).

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanmich View Post
found this:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...94#post1440194

could the LTM and Nikon mount lenses share the same filter thread?
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery

Last edited by furcafe : 11-01-2010 at 06:53.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2011   #69
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 41
Posts: 14,253
Anybody using the f/2 version on a M9? How do you like it? Any examples?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2011   #70
philosomatographer
Registered User
 
philosomatographer's Avatar
 
philosomatographer is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 227
After about 8 months of use, I can, from my perspective, still assert that the Heliar 50/3.5 is the most consistently spectacular lens for 35mm photography that I have ever used. It's glued to my M3 - may as well have been a fixed-lens camera. It's immediately apparent when printing a negative from this lens, the solidity and "cohesion" of the image, the tightness of the grain around fine detail (evidence of the extremely "relaxed" optical design, minimal random scattering of light), the complete and utter lack of aberration... It's a really special lens.

The connoisseur can clearly see the difference when printing negatives from this lens, vs. most other faster 50mm lenses stopped down.

I have posted this image elsewhere before: Shot at f/3.5, printed to 12x16in - apart from the obvious grain (Fomapan 100), the print stands up to a level of close scrutiny that is unbelievable for a 35mm lens shot wide open.



If you can live with f/3.5, you can do no better than with this lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2011   #71
Alnitak
Registered User
 
Alnitak is offline
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 99
I love both of these lenses. Right now I have the 50/3.5, but I've had two of the 50/2's: One that came in a kit with my Bessa Anniversary edition (and was collapsible), and for a while I used the Nickel version. The optics in those two are identical. I really like the rendering of the 50/2; it's a tiny bit soft wide open, but not in a bad way, but rather in a classic "glow" way. Here's a bunch of shots taken with this lens on my M9 and also on film with the Bessa and/or an M6:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhapema...7624951974605/

And here's a collection of a few shots at various apertures with the 50/2 Nickel on the M9:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/jhapema...7626070042399/

Jeff
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-17-2011   #72
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 47
Posts: 4,112
I have used the 50/2 Heliar on my M9, but don't have very many good examples. I tend to use the M9 for available darkness & f/2 is generally too slow. Lens works fine, though.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe...ahreblack2006/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/furcafe...niversary2009/

Quote:
Originally Posted by jsrockit View Post
Anybody using the f/2 version on a M9? How do you like it? Any examples?
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery

Last edited by furcafe : 05-18-2011 at 03:49.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-18-2011   #73
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 41
Posts: 14,253
Thanks Alnitak.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-18-2011   #74
Calzone
Gear Whore #1
 
Calzone's Avatar
 
Calzone is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Hell Gate, Madhattan
Age: 56
Posts: 4,019
John,

I have both nickel heliars for you to try. Also from another thread I see you are interested in low contrast glass like my 50 Rigid.

I was looking and comparing negatives, and confirmed the resolution and detail that the 50/3.5 has. A very special lens that I find is moderate contrast, but the 50/2.0 has this smooth OOF rendering and pretty bokeh.

BTW I'm glad I own all three, but the close focus is limited to 1 meter on all three lenses.

Cal
__________________
"Vintage Hipster"

Maggie's blog: WWW.AccidentalIcon.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-18-2011   #75
jsrockit
Moderator
 
jsrockit's Avatar
 
jsrockit is offline
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: NYC
Age: 41
Posts: 14,253
Cal,

I was going to ask to try your 3.5 and 2.0 soon... the CVs. I'm familiar with the Rigid.

I'm not sure if this Sunday is a good day, but hopefully soon. John
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:17.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.