Serenar 28mm 3.5 lens

jvan01 · 08-28-2009

I'm looking at one of these lenses, and was wondering if it would be compatible with a Voigtlander Type II adapter? I've heard that lenses with infinity locks can't screw on to Type II rings. Is there a workaround or do I need a different adapter?

xayraa33 · 08-28-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by jvan01

I'm looking at one of these lenses, and was wondering if it would be compatible with a Voigtlander Type II adapter? I've heard that lenses with infinity locks can't screw on to Type II rings. Is there a workaround or do I need a different adapter?

Buy a used Leitz M adapter with the bottom cutout.
Leitz made some like that.

Philippe D. · 08-29-2009

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by jvan01

I'm looking at one of these lenses, and was wondering if it would be compatible with a Voigtländer Type II adapter?

I have this Canon lens (as well as the f/2.8), and yes, you may use the type II adapter with both. Because the infinity lock (when pushed) is still far from the flange.

raid · 08-29-2009

How much is such a lens selling for these days?

photobizzz · 08-30-2009

There is one in the classifieds with no caps for $300, but the same lens is listed on the auction site starting at $200. It is the 28/2.8 version that goes for $400 normally, and the one I really want.

raid · 08-30-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by photobizzz

There is one in the classifieds with no caps for $300, but the same lens is listed on the auction site starting at $200. It is the 28/2.8 version that goes for $400 normally, and the one I really want.

I wonder if itis true that the 28/3.5 is sharper than the 28/2.8.What are your impressions?

Thanks.

loneranger · 08-30-2009

I am selling my 28/3.5 currently in the classifieds. I've had the 28/2.8 also. The 28/2.8 is not as sharp or contrastly as the 3.5 stopped down, but wide open, and right in the center, the 28/2.8 is sharp as hell, but that is only in the center, it is perfect for B/W portraits.

raid · 08-30-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by loneranger

I am selling my 28/3.5 currently in the classifieds. I've had the 28/2.8 also. The 28/2.8 is not as sharp or contrastly as the 3.5 stopped down, but wide open, and right in the center, the 28/2.8 is sharp as hell, but that is only in the center, it is perfect for B/W portraits.

I have never used the 28/2.8 but I like using the 28/3.5. Thanks for the useful information.

januaryman · 09-03-2009

At my group on flickr some guy is selling the 28/2.8 - He mentions it was just CLA'ed at Essex. I'm not vouching for him/her, as I don't know anything about this person. Not even a photostream I can see... but it might be a good buy.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/canon-r...7622074770194/

januaryman · 09-03-2009

And the 28/3.5 I have is a terrific lens, for which I paid top $ at Kevin's Cameras.

kbg32 · 09-03-2009

Quote:

Originally Posted by raid

I wonder if itis true that the 28/3.5 is sharper than the 28/2.8.What are your impressions?

Thanks.

I owned one of these for awhile Raid. Other then the love for its compactness compared to my 28/2.8 Elmarit ll, I thought the lens I owned sucked. I bought mine in mint condition for $100. That's all I ever thought it was worth. I am surprised so many people here prize this lens. It was not sharp at all. Detail was mushy, even with film processed in Rodinal, which is a high acutance developer.

If you want a compact 28, go for the CV 28/3.5. Worth every penny.

ampguy · 09-03-2009

I'm a big fan of the Canon 28/2.8. Haven't owned the Canon 28/3.5, but have owned or own the Canon 35/3.5, CV 28/3.5, CV 28/1.9, and M-Hex 28/2.8 (awesome lens, but large relative to the Canon).

For me, 1/2 of my 28mm shots are wide open @ 2.8 or faster, so the 3.5 is not an option. I love the contrast and sharpness of the Canon 28/2.8, especially in b/w.

Here are some snaps from the lens on an RD1.

ferider · 09-03-2009

I think there is some sample variation for both lenses. You Ted, got a good lens

ampguy · 09-03-2009

Thanks Roland, I love this little lens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ferider

I think there is some sample variation for both lenses. You Ted, got a good lens

vrgard · 09-03-2009

And Ted, I still haven't forgiven Roland for letting that 28/2.8 get away from me.

As for the 28/3.5, of which I have two copies, unlike kbg32 both of mine are plenty sharp. No mushiness whatsoever. Guess Roland is right about sample variation. And it's wonderfully small.

-Randy

ampguy · 09-04-2009

Yes, this is one impressive lens, really the ultimate travel 28. I'm also pleased with the color and flare handling. It must have some good coatings.

Here are some snaps in color from the lens.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vrgard

And Ted, I still haven't forgiven Roland for letting that 28/2.8 get away from me.

As for the 28/3.5, of which I have two copies, unlike kbg32 both of mine are plenty sharp. No mushiness whatsoever. Guess Roland is right about sample variation. And it's wonderfully small.

-Randy

naruto · 09-04-2009

It's a great little lens to have on the M body. I moved to a color skopar 28/3.5 from Roland which is a lot more contrasty. The serenar is great for B&W shots.

conradyiu · 10-23-2009

how about canon 25/3.5? compared with 28/3.5 the contrast & sharpness?