Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 03-22-2012   #2226
al1966
Feed Your Head
 
al1966's Avatar
 
al1966 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: UK
Age: 47
Posts: 607
OM2 50 1.4

Attached Images
File Type: jpg OM2_2012_03_10C_FP4_0023.jpg (101.7 KB, 482 views)
__________________
Life is a series of photographs surrounded by the worthless bits

http://jamesagrady.blog.com/
http://randompicture.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41452653@N05/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-22-2012   #2227
tedwhite
Registered User
 
tedwhite is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bisbee, Arizona
Posts: 3,547
Looks like my neighbor friend (but, as far as we know, she's not pregnant).
__________________

rangefinder forum gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2228
Roscoe
Registered User
 
Roscoe is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: my home
Posts: 118
Not sure if anyone is interested, but there is a clean looking Zuiko 24mm f2 that may go relatively cheap on the Exciting Big auction site. I would keep it to myself and bid, but I already have one.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2229
Jockos
Registered User
 
Jockos's Avatar
 
Jockos is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sweden
Age: 25
Posts: 436
Discovered the Fomapan 100 Classic film. I bought one roll, just to try it out in my last large order - after I scanned the roll I immediately placed an order for 100ft more!



Fomapan 100 with the Zuiko 21/3.5.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2230
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 61
Posts: 16,105
that will do.
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2231
philosomatographer
Registered User
 
philosomatographer's Avatar
 
philosomatographer is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
Jockos - ah, another Fomapan 100 user! For some strange reason, I really like this film. (Well, liked, I don't have any left, can't get any more locally. I am going to try out some of the Adox old-school films though, I've already ordered some.)

I used to be very concerned about grain etc. in 35mm but I now embrace this as part of the small-format aesthetic. When I want grainless and higher resolution, I just use a larger format camera. Makes all the the lens performance anxiety etc disappear, just enjoy 35mm for what it is!
__________________
My tools: Leica M3 SS + CV Heliar 50/3.5.Mamiya RB67 + 37/4.5, 50/4.5, 65/4.5, 127/3.8, 140/4.5 Macro, 250/4.5. Linhof Technika V + Super-Angulons 75/8 and 90/8, APO-Symmar 150/5.6, Nikkor-T*ED 360/8.0 + 500/11 + 720/16.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2232
tedwhite
Registered User
 
tedwhite is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bisbee, Arizona
Posts: 3,547
I think, if you google Freestyle in L.A., they may still have Fomapan.
__________________

rangefinder forum gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2233
Jockos
Registered User
 
Jockos's Avatar
 
Jockos is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sweden
Age: 25
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by philosomatographer View Post
Jockos - ah, another Fomapan 100 user! For some strange reason, I really like this film. (Well, liked, I don't have any left, can't get any more locally. I am going to try out some of the Adox old-school films though, I've already ordered some.)

I used to be very concerned about grain etc. in 35mm but I now embrace this as part of the small-format aesthetic. When I want grainless and higher resolution, I just use a larger format camera. Makes all the the lens performance anxiety etc disappear, just enjoy 35mm for what it is!
You could probably buy it from the US. Freestyle has added a slow, albeit cheap, international shipping option!

I think I fell for the really creamy off-whites that came straight from the scanner - actually I haven't tried any film thus far that goes so well with my Nikon scanner. And the grain seems reasonable to!
Although I did find it a bit physically soft, got scratches all over from the squeegee
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2234
tedwhite
Registered User
 
tedwhite is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bisbee, Arizona
Posts: 3,547
Jockos: Don't squeegee Fomapan. The emulsion, when wet, is amazingly soft and thus will scratch if you just breathe hard on it.

What I do is finish the wash off with fotoflo, then just hang it and let it air dry in a dust-free and breeze-free environment as even tiny particles of dust can stick to the soft emulsion. With other, sturdier films (Tri-X, for example) after I've hung it I'll run a thumb and forefinger down the filmstrip to remove excess water. Of course if you dig ditches for a living you will have rough-textured skin so you can't do that either.

I gave up on squeegees years ago after scratching a 2 1/4 X 2 1/4 portrait neg.
__________________

rangefinder forum gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2012   #2235
Jockos
Registered User
 
Jockos's Avatar
 
Jockos is offline
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sweden
Age: 25
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedwhite View Post
Jockos: Don't squeegee Fomapan. The emulsion, when wet, is amazingly soft and thus will scratch if you just breathe hard on it.
Yes, I even read that on the Internet before I tried the film, yet I was stupid enough to do it anyways; thinking that since the squeegee was brand new and thoroughly rinsed, there shouldn't be any problems.

Guess I learn the hard way
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2012   #2236
nighstar
eternal beginner
 
nighstar's Avatar
 
nighstar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Australia
Age: 27
Posts: 497
is digital allowed....?

55mm/1.2


BEST FRIENDS by nighstar, on Flickr

55mm/1.2 + Olympus Auto Extension tubes x3


creamy p.i.n.k. by nighstar, on Flickr
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-27-2012   #2237
wblynch
Registered User
 
wblynch is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 471
I thought the spirit of this thread is dedicated to the OM film cameras. But I am only one small voice.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-27-2012   #2238
ColinW
* Click *
 
ColinW's Avatar
 
ColinW is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the Matrix
Posts: 155
Quote:
Originally Posted by wblynch View Post
I thought the spirit of this thread is dedicated to the OM film cameras. But I am only one small voice.
Indeed. I thought the same. I suppose it depends on the OP.
__________________
"Take snapshot into the light, snapshot into the light, I'm shooting into the light" - Peter Gabriel
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-27-2012   #2239
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,584

OM3 + Zuiko 24/2 on Ilford XP2
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 03-27-2012   #2240
paulfish4570
Registered User
 
paulfish4570's Avatar
 
paulfish4570 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: On the Locust Fork of the Warrior River, Alabama
Age: 61
Posts: 16,105
beautiful "print," will ...
__________________
Paul
i seek to photograph the things not seen.

" ... faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen." Hebrews 11-1
"One eye sees. The other eye feels." - Paul Klee
"... For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal." - apostle Paul, 2 Corinthians, 4:18
"Film will only become art when it's materials are as inexpensive as pencil and paper." - Jean Cocteau

http://blackcreekjournal.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-02-2012   #2241
kemal_mumcu
Registered User
 
kemal_mumcu's Avatar
 
kemal_mumcu is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Dakar
Posts: 266
Another from the 28 2.8. Portra 800

[IMG]
Untitled by kemal_mumcu, on Flickr[/IMG]
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #2242
Liquid-Sky
Unregistered consumer
 
Liquid-Sky's Avatar
 
Liquid-Sky is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: France
Age: 45
Posts: 209
Om-2n 50f1.4 ilford hp5+

__________________
a bit of this , a bit of that...
OM Gears and P&S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/liquidsky1/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #2243
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,584
^------- Please tell me that it's a deliberate construction, and not someone hanging off the parking garage...
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #2244
Liquid-Sky
Unregistered consumer
 
Liquid-Sky's Avatar
 
Liquid-Sky is offline
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: France
Age: 45
Posts: 209
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
^------- Please tell me that it's a deliberate construction, and not someone hanging off the parking garage...
this Jaguar car is a piece of art, so is this deliberate construction!
__________________
a bit of this , a bit of that...
OM Gears and P&S
http://www.flickr.com/photos/liquidsky1/
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-03-2012   #2245
agi
Registered User
 
agi's Avatar
 
agi is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post

OM3 + Zuiko 24/2 on Ilford XP2
Gorgeous Will...

I just picked up a 24/2 myself and was wondering if a hood is needed to reduce flare. Do you use a hood on yours?

I've become a complete Zuikoholic now...

John
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2012   #2246
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by agi View Post
Gorgeous Will...

I just picked up a 24/2 myself and was wondering if a hood is needed to reduce flare. Do you use a hood on yours?

I've become a complete Zuikoholic now...

John
John,
I don't have a hood for the 24/2. I imagine it would certainly help. Though I don't have a single photo that is messed up by flare. For example:



There's a bright sun somewhere in the picture above
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2012   #2247
MaxFrank
Registered User
 
MaxFrank is offline
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 32
Wow, I never realized how awesome these OM cameras look. I'm tempted to buy one now but I also realize that I do have a perfectly fine working minolta X-700. Could someone compare the size of these bodies, and even better if they have experience with both tell me which they prefer. Glass for the olympus seems to be more readily available, but the minolta glass is cheaper.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2012   #2248
redisburning
Registered User
 
redisburning's Avatar
 
redisburning is offline
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxFrank View Post
Wow, I never realized how awesome these OM cameras look. I'm tempted to buy one now but I also realize that I do have a perfectly fine working minolta X-700. Could someone compare the size of these bodies, and even better if they have experience with both tell me which they prefer. Glass for the olympus seems to be more readily available, but the minolta glass is cheaper.
I don't have an x-700, but I do have an SRT-101.

I like the OM-1 a lot more as a camera. It's a lot smaller and I like the viewfinder better.

The only Minolta lens I have is the 58/1.2 and it's definitely better than my OM 50/1.4 silvernose or 1.8 mij IMO. That being said, I like the OM 50/3.5 MC Macro more than any other SLR lens I own.

Both are solid. Both have different looks as a family of lenses. I like my OM lenses and wish I had some more but most of my money going forward will go to M mount lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2012   #2249
Pete B
Registered User
 
Pete B's Avatar
 
Pete B is offline
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 550
I bought a an OM1n and an OM 2n and some lenses on impulse a few months ago. Rather than take my Leica ski touring in Alaska I took the OM1n. It performed faultlessly and I'm very impressed with the flare resistance. It's got me wondering if I really need so much money tied up in Leica glass/bodies.
Pete
CNV00008..jpg

CNV00016.jpg

CNV00025.jpg
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2012   #2250
agi
Registered User
 
agi's Avatar
 
agi is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowfox View Post
John,
I don't have a hood for the 24/2. I imagine it would certainly help. Though I don't have a single photo that is messed up by flare. For example:



There's a bright sun somewhere in the picture above
Pictures are louder than words. Thank you kindly sir as this answers my question.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.