Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Canon RF

Canon RF For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Best 85mm VF?
Old 08-17-2009   #1
Bill58
Native Texan
 
Bill58's Avatar
 
Bill58 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Korea
Posts: 3,088
Best 85mm VF?

I've got a Canon 85/ 1.8 for portraits and tried a CV90 VF for framing, but it's obviously not precise for close work. What do you recommend? I prefer one w/ frame lines.

Thanks,
Bill
__________________
Too many cameras-too little time. [b]


My images of a strange land-So. Korea:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wrs111445/
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #2
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,303
Don't think there is anything better, Bill. There are 85mm BL finders from Leica, Canon and Nikon, and an 80mm finder from Komura, all hard to find and with fundamentally the same problem at close distance - difficult to get things in focus.

You might not like this recommendation, but a lens like this needs a dedicated body, IMO. Using 90mm framelines for 85 works well for me. 100 might be a bit too tight ...

Best,

Roland.

Last edited by ferider : 08-17-2009 at 17:27.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #3
bennyng
Benny Ng
 
bennyng's Avatar
 
bennyng is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tokyo/Singapore
Posts: 844
Bill,

Roland's right about getting accurate framing at close distance. The Leica 85mm finders are very expensive. It's probably cheaper to get a good Canon 7 with 85mm frameline than the Leica 85mm finder. The Nikkor and Canon finders are much cheaper and also have parallex correction. The late black type has framelines which you prefer. The russian 85mm finders are a good option too. I think David Murphy was selling one just a while ago.

Cheers,
__________________

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #4
peterm1
Registered User
 
peterm1's Avatar
 
peterm1 is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,780
I have used two types mainly - the original Canon chrome "tube" type which are a bit small and "squinty" but are readily available. The later black and chrome models by Canon are better. And I have used turret finders -either the after market ones or Leicas VIOOH type. The after market ones are preferable as the Leica ones mask off the area (so it gets smaller for longer focus lenses) while the others actually enlarge the image depending on the frame / focal length in use. This makes it much easier to see the details when longer lenses (85/90 and 135) are in use. Go to the Stephen Gandy site - I seem to recall he has an article on viewfinder options.
__________________
Peter M

Flickr me: http://www.flickr.com/photos/80702381@N00/[SIGPIC]
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #5
ethics_gradient
Registered User
 
ethics_gradient's Avatar
 
ethics_gradient is offline
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 320
Don't get the FSU one: I had one arrive with a J-9 I ordered and it was basically a little pinhole you look through. Seemed fairly useless, lens was a dud so I didn't hang on to either it or the finder. Now that I have a working, finder-less J-9 I just use the 90mm frames on my R3A and guestimate. To an extent that's what RF shooting is all about.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #6
BillBingham2
Moderator
 
BillBingham2 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ames, Iowa, USA
Posts: 4,261
Canon and Nikon both made some great Brightline finder with correction years back. Are you using the frame lines on a Bessa or an external VF? If it's an external could it have been damaged (read dropped before you got her?)? If it's internal do you have the same problem with other lenses up close?

Have you done the 3 foot edge test? Get a tripod and mount your camera on it. One the wall put a large set of papers covering about four feet tall and five feet wide. Put the camera, tripod in the middle of it and focus to three feet (or so, just really close). You may want to put a little cross in the middle where you focus on. Put small marks at the edges of your frame in a dark color and then mark every half inch from there on both the X and Y (up, down, left, right) axis say about four inches from the corner.

This should give you an idea of how far you are off. Do this with your 85 and a 50. Just for giggles do it on a 35 too.

That close up it might be a combination of things that have thrown you off.

B2 (;->
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-17-2009   #7
Al Kaplan
Registered User
 
Al Kaplan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 70
Posts: 4,572
I use the 90mm frame for both my 85 Nikkor and my 90mm Elmarit. It's close enough. For the type of shooting I do it works great. Negative carriers, slide mounts, and the Fuji machine tha Walgreens all cut off some image anyway. Most SLR's don't show the entire image on the ground glass. There arer better things to worry about.
__________________
RIP

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:36.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.