Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

CV 35mm/2.5 screw mount vs 35mm/2.5 PII
Old 08-06-2009   #1
chadmopix
Registered User
 
chadmopix is offline
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6
CV 35mm/2.5 screw mount vs 35mm/2.5 PII

Hi. I'm looking for some advice on two 35mm Voigtlander lens, specifically the 35mm/2.5 PII and the 35mm/2.5 Color Skopar screw mount to be used with an M-mount adapter.

I currently use a 21mm/4 Voigtlander and a 50mm/2 Zeiss ZM (both of which are great) on an R4A and M6 respectively, but I'm looking for something fairly compact, or at least something that doesn't protrude as much as the 50mm. The pancake seems like the obvious answer, but the screw mount 35mm seems quite compact as well, even with the built-in hood.

I haven't been able to physically handle the lenses which makes a direct comparison difficult. Also, I should mention budget is a real concern.

Can anyone advise on the actual size/depth difference between these lenses, their overall quality and sharpness, or just their experiences in general with either lens?

Thanks very much!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2009   #2
Larry H-L
Registered User
 
Larry H-L is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 122
They are all small, very close in size. (there was a P1 also).
The build quality of the PII is a notch higher, it might be slightly heavier.
All use the same lens formula, AFAIK.
Check Stephen's Cameraquest site for picture size comparison:
http://www.cameraquest.com/voigtlen.htm
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-06-2009   #3
mdspace
Registered User
 
mdspace's Avatar
 
mdspace is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Japan - Mexico
Posts: 136
The lenses optical formula are the same, 7 elements in 5 groups.
The Color Skopar screw mount has a retro look and handle, specially the focusing lever, it includes the brass hood and the metal push on cap. This lens is thinner but large and the weight is a little bit light.
The Color Skopar PII looks modern, it doesn't include the hood and its cap is a plastic snap on.
My personal opinion is that both of them are a wonderful lenses and with the same performance, but the Color Skopar PII is more aluminium than brass to be sincere.
__________________
"The life is like the sea's foam, that is why we have to do like the sea does..."
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-07-2009   #4
notturtle
Registered User
 
notturtle is offline
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 345
I chose the pancake 2 for the ergonomics, allegedly better build and hood arrangement. Very happy, a very sharp little lens.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-10-2009   #5
fixbones
.......sometimes i thinks
 
fixbones is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Age: 31
Posts: 765
i have the 35mm f2.5 in LTM and Chrome. Loving this lens!!!
Small even with the built in hood.
I am also very fond of the focusing lever but others may differ.

Both have the same optical formula.

** Just did a VERY mini review of this lens on my blog (link below) with example of the bokeh
__________________
My Photojournal - and sometimes i just sits
Camera: M7, MP, M4 BP, FE2, MJU II, XA, GR1v
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:32.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.