|
View Poll Results: Which one is for you?
|
|
L
|
 
|
34 |
4.36% |
|
T
|
 
|
38 |
4.88% |
|
R
|
 
|
103 |
13.22% |
|
R2
|
 
|
54 |
6.93% |
|
R2M (Jahre 250)
|
 
|
11 |
1.41% |
|
R2M
|
 
|
36 |
4.62% |
|
R2A
|
 
|
93 |
11.94% |
|
R3M (Jahre 250)
|
 
|
34 |
4.36% |
|
R3M
|
 
|
67 |
8.60% |
|
R3A
|
 
|
127 |
16.30% |
|
R4M
|
 
|
89 |
11.42% |
|
R4A
|
 
|
93 |
11.94% |
06-22-2012
|
#176
|
|
Registered User
crispy12 is offline
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 259
|
I'm loving my R2. Can't believe the difference in price between an R2 and R2M new. The finish is also much much nicer on the R2! Hate the matte black and button rewind.
|
|
|
|
06-25-2012
|
#177
|
|
photomonkey
Chrisrw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Seattle
Posts: 166
|
I love my R2. I bought it here back in January with a MC CV 40/1.4. Had trouble with the ergonomics of the focusing ring/knob, but absolutely loved the feel of the camera. Decided that is was an impulse buy and put both up for sale. Had a taker for just the lens and after spending time with him waxing Bessa's (he had the R3A) during the sell, I realized that I loved the R2 body and decided to keep it. I didn't want to spend another $450-500 right away for another Nokton so I got a Jupiter 8 with adapter from Fedka. Haven't developed any film yet, but I love how the lens feels. I find it easier to focus without a knob on it and love the camera even more. I see no reason to move up to a Leica now. I can save all that $ for film instead.
|
|
|
|
06-25-2012
|
#178
|
|
Registered User
PointOmega is offline
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 56
|
Good stuff. I have an R3A, and consider it one of the most underrated camera bodies of all time. A wonderful machine, you don't need anything more.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
07-01-2012
|
#179
|
|
Registered User
Hamel is offline
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boston
Age: 25
Posts: 114
|
I love my R3A and usually burn between 5-10 rolls through it a week on average. However the 1:1 finder isn't as useful as I thought it would be and having the batteries die once or twice without backups is extremely frustrating. However I'm not sure I would be as happy if it weren't for aperture priority. Just wish when the batteries died you could still shoot at 1/60 or 1/125 mechanically.
That being said I've been contemplating trying to find someone who wants to trade for an R2a or r4a. I think the wider frame lines and viewfinder magnification would suit my eye and shooting style better. If anyone is interested shoot me a PM.
Also torn on selling it to buy another Mamiya 6 body since my first one broke. However the Bessa is just so damn easy to carry EVERYWHERE and try more shots since 35mm is basically free compared to MF.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Godfrey
Equipment is transient. Photographs matter.
|
|
|
|
|
 |
07-05-2012
|
#180
|
|
Registered User
jayavant is offline
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 40
|
I have a Bessa L. Lovely little thing but not robust at all. I treat it with some care these days. It's been repaired twice - most recently a whole new shutter. Typically it has a Snapshot Skopar 25/4 on it but occasionally a Heliar 15/4.5 as in this photo -
Cosina-Voigtländer Bessa-L by The Central Scrutiniser, on Flickr
But the one I want is the Bessa III. It's not on the poll so I voted for L.
|
|
|
|
08-03-2012
|
#181
|
|
Registered User
wdeskiew is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Poland
Posts: 28
|
I've just received my R4A - the range of lenses covered by the viewfinder is what I need. R4M would do as well.
__________________
What I like the most in the analog photography is the smell of cameras and of a darkroom chemistry...
My flickr
|
|
|
|
09-03-2012
|
#182
|
|
Registered User
maxmars is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 7
|
Just bought a used "R" on the net.
I've got a few FSU lenses that I love and the Bessa R looked like a logical choice.
I also have a small collection of FEDs that I use daily with great satisfaction, but I miss the additional times and synch of a more modern design.
I'm a bit worried about robustness, though. FEDs have really spoiled me in that regard.
|
|
|
|
09-09-2012
|
#183
|
|
Registered User
sparrow6224 is online now
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: New York NY
Posts: 848
|
The one I WANT is buried in Tom A.'s post -- The R2S. A modern camera for the Nikon lenses.... very appealing. Next i'd take the R4A for my 21, 28 and desired 25. When I came back to photography 4 years ago my first rangefinder was the R2. I really liked it. Eventually the collection grew and the R2 went in one of my regular "sweeps"-- I come at the closet every three months like a team of INS agents in a ghetto tenement.
|
|
|
|
09-19-2012
|
#184
|
|
Bodger Extraordinaire
Dez is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Mississauga, Ontario
Posts: 581
|
I would like an updated model Bessa R. I have a bunch of old screwmount lenses, and can't afford M ones. If you are going to be a Luddite, at least you should do it properly, so it should be revised with better and more traditional materials. My old Bessa R works great, but is awfully plasticy beside something like, for example, a Contax IIIa.
Cheers,
Dez
|
|
|
|
10-30-2012
|
#185
|
|
Registered User
varchs is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kastoria, Greece
Posts: 101
|
I am thinking of purchasing a R2M...
after hours of research and "meditation" in order to take the Bessa decision I'll go for the puristic approach... (guiding meter instead of computer driven shutter)
I have run out of batteries many times while hiking (cold weather) and with R2M is possible to take pictures by using sunny-16* or even an exposure chart...
I suppose that the frame-lines 35/50/75/90 cover my needs in lenses.
...and it is easier to go wider with a viewfinder, as focusing is not that an issue in wide angles...
Thank you for reading my thoughts...
|
|
|
|
11-01-2012
|
#186
|
|
Registered User
Gan|Path is offline
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 5
|
Bessa 'L' with 25MM Snapshot. It really made me like Film photography because of the simplicity of it
__________________
Voigtlander Bessa R4M
Voigtlander Bessa 'L'
|
|
|
|
11-01-2012
|
#187
|
|
Trigger finger
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,074
|
I have an M3 with a 21mm and 50mm lens. Which CV Bessa should I get to go with the M3 body? R4m for the 21? R3M for the 50? Bessa L? etc. Advise requested.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012
|
#188
|
|
Registered User
gliderbee is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lubbeek, Belgium
Posts: 813
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by varchs
I am thinking of purchasing a R2M...
after hours of research and "meditation" in order to take the Bessa decision I'll go for the puristic approach... (guiding meter instead of computer driven shutter)
I have run out of batteries many times while hiking (cold weather) and with R2M is possible to take pictures by using sunny-16* or even an exposure chart...
I suppose that the frame-lines 35/50/75/90 cover my needs in lenses.
...and it is easier to go wider with a viewfinder, as focusing is not that an issue in wide angles...
Thank you for reading my thoughts...
|
Then why not the R3M? That one gives you a 1:1viewfinder and the difference between the 35 and 40 framelines is neglible, imo.
Stefan.
|
|
|
|
11-07-2012
|
#189
|
|
Registered User
gliderbee is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Lubbeek, Belgium
Posts: 813
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kshapero
I have an M3 with a 21mm and 50mm lens. Which CV Bessa should I get to go with the M3 body? R4m for the 21? R3M for the 50? Bessa L? etc. Advise requested.
|
R4M for 21. Your M3 is fine for 50mm.
|
|
|
|
12-28-2012
|
#190
|
|
Registered User
reiki_ is offline
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 227
|
Does someone have a picture of framelines for 50mm on the Bessa R?
|
|
|
|
12-28-2012
|
#191
|
|
Registered User
teleparallel is offline
Join Date: Mar 2012
Age: 28
Posts: 89
|
I have a R4A, with my(now) almost perfect collection of skopar lenses. 21 35 an 50! I voted for the R4m though. I use my bessa in manual mode all the time, and i'd like to have the more precise meter readout.
|
|
|
|
 |
R2s back-up camera |
 |
12-29-2012
|
#192
|
|
...new old stock
mynikonf2 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: …in NE’ly Florida, of SE’ly North America, in the Northern hemisphere of the 3rd planet out from Sol, lying within the Orion-Cygnus Arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, a member of the Virgo Galactic Supercluster or thereabouts...
Age: 61
Posts: 513
|
R2s back-up camera
Really like the framelines for 85 & 35mm in the R2S, they are my two favorite focal lengths.
__________________
Mike
N.H.S. member
“Light scratches consistent with age and wear”
...i hardly know her.
|
|
|
|
01-30-2013
|
#193
|
|
Registered User
Pioneer is offline
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 332
|
Bessa R2C as back up for my Contax II and Bessa R as back up to my Tower Type 3.
__________________
"One should really use the camera as though tomorrow you'd be stricken blind..."
Dorothea Lange
|
|
|
|
03-06-2013
|
#194
|
|
Registered User
Ambrosius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 8
|
Very happy with my R but I want M mount and better construction. The top plate is becoming "grey" and and the back is scratched. But I really want M mount, so I will look for a R2 (maybe the olive)
|
|
|
|
03-07-2013
|
#195
|
|
Registered User
froyd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 901
|
Had an R2a because it covered the 35/50 range with room to go a little longer if needed. At the time I thought I had to have AE because I was coming from matrix-metering SLRs and felt insecure in my ability to operate the camera quickly enough to keep up with my rug rats.
After owning a few meterless bodies (Rolleiflex, M4, Exacta), I no longer feel a need for AE, and think I could do very well with an R2M, especially for what seems to me as the best meter read-out pf all the metered M bodies.
Problem is, I like chrome, and the chrome R2M is very hard to come by!
|
|
|
|
4 Weeks Ago
|
#196
|
|
Registered User
Cameron is offline
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 17
|
Hey everyone, I have a quick question. I have a Bessa-R and the only thing I'm not fanatic about is the lightweight/plastic feel to it. That's just me, I like a solid, heavy object - whatever it may be. Do the latera cameras (R2M/R2A, R3M/R3A, R4M) have the same plasticky build quality? Or is there a metallic, heavy feel to it? I'm not fortunate to get my hands on either of those models.
|
|
|
|
 |
Not light |
 |
4 Weeks Ago
|
#197
|
|
Registered User
KismetSky is offline
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1
|
Not light
I weighed my new to me R3A with 40 1.4 on a kitchen scale - 1 lb 8 oz.
My Nikon FE2 with 50 1.8 Series E weighs 1 lb 10 oz.
The R3A feels heavy and substantial.
|
|
|
|
3 Weeks Ago
|
#198
|
|
Registered User
tedwhite is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bisbee, Arizona
Posts: 3,546
|
But the Bessa R remains one hell of a good camera. I wasn't fond of the plastic feel, but it never failed to work and its meter was the best of any camera I've ever owned, and I've been around for awhile.
|
|
|
|
1 Week Ago
|
#199
|
|
Registered User
VitoCipriani is offline
Join Date: May 2013
Location: The North, United Kingdom
Age: 34
Posts: 30
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tedwhite
But the Bessa R remains one hell of a good camera. I wasn't fond of the plastic feel, but it never failed to work and its meter was the best of any camera I've ever owned, and I've been around for awhile.
|
I've got a Bessa R and I absolutely love it. I knew of the plastic, lightweight feel before I bought it and had doubts about it, but I've grown to love it. It's much more sturdy than I thought it would be. Its lightweight nature is an advantage sometimes too, in my view.
The only thing that frustrates me about my Bessa R is the positioning of the strap lugs. But I can live with that.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:24. |
|
|