Kodak discontinues HC-110 in Oz?
Old 07-28-2009   #1
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
 
mfunnell's Avatar
 
mfunnell is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,842
Kodak discontinues HC-110 in Oz?

That's what I was told when Vanbar called me back to discuss an order. I'd ordered some cheap (AUD$2.50/roll) Lucky brand film (on the "how bad can it be?" theory) and some HC-110. They called me back to say they were all out of cheap film (of course) but could ship the developer if I still wanted it, which I did.

The guy who called me, however, noted that Kodak had discontinued distribution of HC-110 in Australia and that my order was for the very last of their stock.

None left. At all. Never to be replaced.

If this is so (I couldn't find anyone at Kodak who could tell me a thing about it, although I didn't try that hard in ringing around) then it is probably all my fault, as I decided to use HC-110 in a personal project. Of course a material I decide to standardise on wil always be immediately discontinued. That is in the nature of things.

So everybody should start really worrying about the availability of Tri-X

...Mike
__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." Dave Barry

My RFF top 10(12). My flickr photostream has day-to-day stuff, while dA has some of my better shots.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #2
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,438
Isn't that always the way ... if they stop importing Tri-X they'd have a riot on their hands I suspect. All eleven photogs still shooting film in Oz would be up in arms!

I notice that Freestyle have HC110 listed without the ground shipping only warning!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #3
MichaelW
Registered User
 
MichaelW is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 155
They haven't brought Plus-X into Australia for years, so obviously Kodak Australia is prepared to dump products even though they are available in the rest of the world. At least you can buy Plus-X direct from places like Freestyle. You'd have to check the shipping restrictions on something like HC-110, I know that Freestyle are not permitted to send Rodinal by air. Anyway, it seems like a stupid decision; how hard can it be to hold some small stocks of developer? They may not sell much but i think there is an obligation to support the full product range.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #4
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
Way to go Kodak. They really don't seem to care about their analog product line very much at all anymore do they?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #5
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by sepiareverb View Post
Way to go Kodak. They really don't seem to care about their analog product line very much at all anymore do they?

Historically Kodak were the company that brought photography to the masses ... probably now leading the field as one of the players who seem to want to take it away from us!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #6
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Keith View Post
Historically Kodak were the company that brought photography to the masses ... probably now leading the field as one of the players who seem to want to take it away from us!
I'm still smarting over the loss of my SW fiber paper for contact sheets.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #7
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson's Avatar
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,373
Kodak doesn't want to be an analog company. Hasn't in a long time. Their analog business is pretty small, now. I can't imagine they sell much HC-110 anywhere.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #8
ZeissFan
Registered User
 
ZeissFan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,979
Kodak has been big on introducing new lines of film and then abandoning them when sales fell: 126 Instamatic, 110, 620, 127, 616, Disc and on and on. To be fair, it did stick with 620 (a terrible idea) for an absurdly long time.
__________________
-Mike Elek
» MORE ABOUT CAMERAS »
My scanners: Epson Expression 1600 Pro and HP PhotoSmart S20
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #9
nome_alice
Registered User
 
nome_alice's Avatar
 
nome_alice is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 148
i guess that's good news for Ilford. LC29 is nice stuff
__________________


i hardly know her

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #10
John Bragg
Registered User
 
John Bragg's Avatar
 
John Bragg is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Penwithick, Cornwall U.K.
Age: 51
Posts: 847
Hi Mike.

Although I have never used it, Ilford's "Ilfotec HC" Developer is supposed to be near identical in usage and characteristics. Somewhat like their ID11 to Kodak's D76 I guess.

http://www.ilfordphoto.com/products/...ilm+Developers

Regards, John.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #11
antistatic
Registered User
 
antistatic's Avatar
 
antistatic is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by MichaelW View Post
They haven't brought Plus-X into Australia for years, so obviously Kodak Australia is prepared to dump products even though they are available in the rest of the world.
I've bought Plus X quite a few times here in Perth from a local shop in recent months.
__________________
my flickr

MP, M2, M9, CLE
28 Ultron, 35 Summicron Asph, 35 2.8 Summaron, 40 Rokkor, 50 Summilux Asph, 50 collapsible summicron, 75 Summilux, 90 Rokkor
Rolleiflex 2.8f
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #12
mfunnell
Shaken, so blurred
 
mfunnell's Avatar
 
mfunnell is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Bragg View Post
Hi Mike.

Although I have never used it, Ilford's "Ilfotec HC" Developer is supposed to be near identical in usage and characteristics. Somewhat like their ID11 to Kodak's D76 I guess.

http://www.ilfordphoto.com/products/...ilm+Developers

Regards, John.
John, thanks for that. It would probably work, except I don't know anywhere to get hold of it here in Oz, either (Vanbar doesn't carry it, nor do other places I've looked).

Oh well. At least I'll have enough HC-110 on hand to last me a while.

...Mike
__________________
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness." Dave Barry

My RFF top 10(12). My flickr photostream has day-to-day stuff, while dA has some of my better shots.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #13
peter_n
~
 
peter_n's Avatar
 
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,129
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
Kodak doesn't want to be an analog company. Hasn't in a long time. Their analog business is pretty small, now. I can't imagine they sell much HC-110 anywhere.
Calumet over on the other side of the river in Cambridge sell quite a bit, it seems to be a standard soup. Lots of schools with photography classes in this area.


__________________
_
~Peter

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #14
maddoc
... likes film.
 
maddoc's Avatar
 
maddoc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: 調布市
Age: 47
Posts: 6,467
Here in Sapporo (Japan) I can't buy it fast enough as soon as it is out of stock. Should pile up some of the stuff ...
__________________
- Gabor

flickr
pBase
blog
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-28-2009   #15
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,098
I'm with Peter- I'd suspect HC-110 could be their #1 selling B&W chemistry.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:46.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.