Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > SLRs - the unRF

SLRs - the unRF For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm they are not RF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Pentax K-7 initial impression
Old 07-09-2009   #1
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,395
Pentax K-7 initial impression

Just a brief report--I got the new Pentax yesterday. Should probably have waited for the price to go down, but I have never been satisfied with any DSLR, and this camera seemed to answer all of my complaints. I couldn't resist.

Overall, I must say that, so far, the K-7 is superb. IQ is identical to the K20D, which is fine by me. But it's smaller, more solid-feeling. AF is much faster, and the shutter is incredibly quiet. The menu system is hugely improved over the K20D, and the styling is reminiscent of some of Pentax's best film cameras, particularly the LX.

Overall, the feeling you get is one of tremendous responsiveness. There is no delay on the readout when you change ISO, shutter speed, or aperture. The new infrared focus assist lamp allows focusing in almost total darkness, and the new 100% viewfinder is clear and bright, the first Pentax VF as good as the LX's. A few buttons I would have put elsewhere, but I'll get used to that...there is now a 1/8000 shutter speed, and a bunch of new features, including an HD video mode, very nice live view, automatic horizon correction, improved (so they say) in-body stabilization, and an in-camera HDR feature I will probably never use.

Ultimately, though, all I care about, beyond IQ, is ergonomics and design--I want to feel, as I do with the LX or the Leica M2, that the tool is not resisting use in any way. This camera seems to have that feel. I still need to do some serious shooting with it, obviously, but all the little things that bother me about other DSLR's, including the K20D, are nowhere to be found.

If you need super-fast, silent AF and 12800 ISO, get a Nikon...but this camera feels very special to me, the first Pentax digital product with genuine character to it.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2009   #2
FA Limited
convo killer
 
FA Limited is offline
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 549
thanks for the report ... seems like the camera is getting favourable reviews everywhere
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2009   #3
bmattock
Lord of Broken Toys
 
bmattock's Avatar
 
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,193
I'm very pleased to hear it, but it will be a long while before I have a K-7. I'm content meanwhile with my K200D (still like my *ist DS, as well).
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2009   #4
freeranger
Registered User
 
freeranger's Avatar
 
freeranger is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Bratislava
Posts: 813
I love pentax because, I feel, they have to try a little harder than the big two. Since the IQ is the same as the k20d, I'll be sticking with that for a while, but thanks for reporting that pentax are continuing with their streak of getting it right.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2009   #5
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 5,921
Thanks for the review. I have the DL and the K10d, I should upgrade but I just don't use them much. I have 4 or 5 primes that fit my other film cameras, so I'm set there. I can't see myself changing from Pentax, maybe if FF comes along. I'm happy to hear that the upgrades are meaningful and not just more buttons for unused functions.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2009   #6
ChrisN
Striving
 
ChrisN's Avatar
 
ChrisN is online now
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,295
Thanks for the initial impressions. I'll be interested in hearing how it feels after three months of use. I'm especially interested in the viewfinder, as the LX VF is superior to any other camera I've handled - if the K-7 comes close to giving that feel I'm impressed. As it is I think I'll skip this generation - my K20D is still young and I'll be looking for some major, rather than marginal, improvements before I'll be tempted. My current priority is to secure each of the FA lenses I want before they go out of production.
__________________
Chris


"The mission of photography is to explain man to man and each to himself. And that is the most complicated thing on earth."
Edward Steichen

RFF Gallery

Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2009   #7
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,395
I'm with you, I still want the 77 Limited. Someday, someday.

So comparing the LX and K-7 viewfinders side by side, I decalre the LX to still be the winner. They are more or less equally bright, though, with perhaps a very slight edge to the LX. The main difference is that the LX's is larger. But the K-7 really does have 100% coverage, and it is superior if you prefer shooting with glasses. It very much feels like a luxury finder.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2009   #8
jky
Registered User
 
jky is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Flamescity Canada
Posts: 1,341
Got to check out the K7 today.... compact, nice VF, much faster AF than my previous Pentax (K10D) and... a very quiet & smooth shutter!
Loved that shutter. I'd say that the overall quality of the sound seemed quieter, if not just as quiet, as the M8 without the upgrade.
The shutter's smooth and well damped as well...
It's fine tool.
__________________
Flickr


  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2009   #9
fleetwoodjazz
Registered User
 
fleetwoodjazz's Avatar
 
fleetwoodjazz is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 88
I used Pentax DSLR because of the FA limited lens and I still have these lens but only for my film camera.

I'm absolutely sure that the K-7 is a fine tool but had it been full-frame, imaging how formidable it can be with the 31mm for street, reportage work.

Starting from film, I found it very hard to used my favourite focal length on a APS-C camera. Of course, one can use wider lens to replicate the effect, but still...you'll never fully get what it used to be on films.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #10
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,395
I'm fine with APS-C personally, bit would be very interesting to see Pentax enter the professional market with a FF camera. They would have to totally rewrite their lens roadmap though.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #11
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,395
One other thing, the AWB is superb! Especially in tungsten light. Really impressive right out of the camera.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #12
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,513
The K7 is very tempting but expensive in the UK - not far off US$1900. One day I will upgrade, but at the moment, the istDS still works fine.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #13
ZeissFan
Registered User
 
ZeissFan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,016
I like my K10D, but I always feel cheated when I put a 28mm lens on it to find that it's now in the 40mm neighborhood. I like the quality of its construction, the viewfinder, its ergonomics and image quality. I absolutely don't like the 1.5x factor.
__________________
-Mike Elek
» MORE ABOUT CAMERAS »
My scanners: Epson Expression 1600 Pro and HP PhotoSmart S20
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #14
bmattock
Lord of Broken Toys
 
bmattock's Avatar
 
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,193
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeissFan View Post
I like my K10D, but I always feel cheated when I put a 28mm lens on it to find that it's now in the 40mm neighborhood. I like the quality of its construction, the viewfinder, its ergonomics and image quality. I absolutely don't like the 1.5x factor.
I'm not a fan of wides in general, although they have their uses. I like having a very very fast (effectively) 75mm f/1.4 for peanuts and a 500mm f/5.6 telephoto that's not a mirror lens.
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #15
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,395
Yeah, I agree--I have really come around on APS-C. Full frame is always available to me on film, and I am really enjoying the Pentax 55-300, which of course is the equivalent of 450. Crop sensor keeps things small and light, and IQ is great.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #16
TKH
Registered User
 
TKH is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 48
Posts: 172
APS-C is not a big problem for me.

With my K20D I love the small Limiteds.

The DA15 (~22mm) is perfect for me to shoot landscape, architecture and fun:




The DA35 (~52mm) is my all day lens, with nice macro plus:





For portrait and details the DA*55 f1,4 (~82mm) is a nearly perfect lens:











The K7 of a near friend is a fantastic camera. I like the small build very mutch. I think I will buy it in a year or two when prices cool down.
Rainer

Last edited by TKH : 07-11-2009 at 06:49.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #17
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,513
TKH - very nice shots indeed. Is the last one with the 55mm? It seems to perform very well close up.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #18
fleetwoodjazz
Registered User
 
fleetwoodjazz's Avatar
 
fleetwoodjazz is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 88
Yes, sure that APS-C is just fine and it shows in the pictures posted here.

But for a dual formats (digital-film) guy like me, what Pentax is doing is not so rosy . In fact I am slowly move to Nikon, it offers better warranty in terms of film.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #19
TKH
Registered User
 
TKH is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 48
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by zuikologist View Post
TKH - very nice shots indeed. Is the last one with the 55mm? It seems to perform very well close up.
Yes its with the 55mm. A great lens for details:








But I think Pentax mastermind Jun Hirakawa designed it for portrait. Look at the background. Its like painted:

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #20
TKH
Registered User
 
TKH is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Germany
Age: 48
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetwoodjazz View Post
In fact I am slowly move to Nikon, it offers better warranty in terms of film.
Yes, Nikon is a big player in the DSLR marcet. But where are the nice primes under 100mm??
No one in the DSLR world is selling more sexy prime lenses than Pentax with the small Limiteds, I think.
In big and heavy zooms Nikon of course is better placed than Pentax.
But IMHO I dont want to carry around 5 to 10 kg camera stuff. So the new Pentax K7 has a place in my heart.

Rainer
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #21
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,513
TKH - I agree. A small and nimble DSLR is preferable for me, use in a similar way to an RF fil camera. I have the 21 and 40 Limited. I also like the FA35/2.0, which is full frame.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #22
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKH View Post
Yes its with the 55mm. A great lens for details:








But I think Pentax mastermind Jun Hirakawa designed it for portrait. Look at the background. Its like painted:


Very nice. The first one is very 3D and the second does show off the bokeh.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #23
fleetwoodjazz
Registered User
 
fleetwoodjazz's Avatar
 
fleetwoodjazz is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by TKH View Post
Yes, Nikon is a big player in the DSLR marcet. But where are the nice primes under 100mm??
No one in the DSLR world is selling more sexy prime lenses than Pentax with the small Limiteds, I think.
In big and heavy zooms Nikon of course is better placed than Pentax.
But IMHO I dont want to carry around 5 to 10 kg camera stuff. So the new Pentax K7 has a place in my heart.

Rainer
For you, the Limiteds are sexy but for me, only the FA Limiteds are sexy. I simply don't have money for "cropped lens".

I was searching for a 77mm as a gift to a friend and I realized how rare the FA Limiteds are now. I have a feeling that Pentax is gradually phrasing out these lenses so it is my best interest to move away.

I started learning photography with large format cameras so every bit of image circle counts. There's simply no way I will pay my money for the smaller image circle of DA Limiteds.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #24
zuikologist
.........................
 
zuikologist is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: London
Posts: 1,513
Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetwoodjazz View Post
For you, the Limiteds are sexy but for me, only the FA Limiteds are sexy. I simply don't have money for "cropped lens".

I was searching for a 77mm as a gift to a friend and I realized how rare the FA Limiteds are now. I have a feeling that Pentax is gradually phrasing out these lenses so it is my best interest to move away.

I started learning photography with large format cameras so every bit of image circle counts. There's simply no way I will pay my money for the smaller image circle of DA Limiteds.
That's a fair comment, but there are many reasonably priced full frame AF and MF lenses, and you only buy them once and of course they are image stabilised on the later Pentax DSLRs. However, the D700 is also very sexy machine with primes.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=867'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by zuikologist : 07-11-2009 at 08:21.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2009   #25
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 57
Posts: 4,633
Too bad I don't grok SLRs the way I once did; the K7 seems to hit a lot of right notes (100% VF accuracy, solid construction, small size, apparently very quiet, and a fair number of primes available). As dSLRs go, I like the sound of this one a whole lot. Were I in the market for one, I'd give this a very close look.

(Perhaps unrelated, but I noticed Adorama is selling the Olympus E-3, body only, for just under a grand...)


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:26.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.