Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Processing C41 in B&W chemicals, what happens ?
Old 06-10-2005   #1
taffer
void
 
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
Processing C41 in B&W chemicals, what happens ?

Hi all,

first of all, this is a question completely out from ignorance, as I really have no idea of the potential mess that this could be

But as I just got a 'free' can with 100ft of color film (probably outdated) with my bulk loader, I've been thinking about possible sperimentin with it...

In fact, Ilford XP2 is a C41 B&W film but can be processed in normal black & white chemicals (at least the Diafine box says so) even though seems the results are not very ... pleasant. To sum up, is it physically possible to develop a C41 color film in B&W (maybe with a previous water wash or something) or would it result in permanent damage/mess to film/chemicals/tank ? Would be happy to hear stories if somebody has tried that...

TIA

Oscar
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #2
Stephanie Brim
Mental Experimental.
 
Stephanie Brim's Avatar
 
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
They turn out black and white...generally. It often produces interesting results. Someone did it at the Lomo.us forums here: http://www.lomo.us/forums/showthread.php?t=8065
__________________

I had a baby girl on December 6, 2007. Yay motherhood!


One camera. Two lenses. Three shots per week.

2008 Street Photography Project
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #3
pshinkaw
Trying to get it right
 
pshinkaw's Avatar
 
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
Oscar:

I've been thinking about doing the same thing. Somewhere there is a website of "found films". The owner takes old film he has found in cameras and develops them to see what mysteries unfold. He does Kodacolor in Accutol and gets pretty decent B&W negatives. I e-mailed him for some details, and he sent me this:

Kodacolor in Accutol for B&W negatives:

10 minutes in Accutol 1:10 - 20c. Water stop bath, alkaline fixer (Photographers Formulary,) wash in running water for a few minutes. Photo-flo and hang in the bathroom.

But he pointed out that most other B&W chemicals will work too.

There is some info on Photo-Net as well.

I've been getting terrible results from color labs developing 126 and 110 film from cameras that used to give me superb results, Kodak Pocket Instamatics and 126 instamatices with Ektar lenses. I'm planning on testing out thisprocess with some Accutol and 110 Kodacolor one of these days.

-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #4
Fred
Feline Great
 
Fred's Avatar
 
Fred is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chippenham Wiltshire England
Age: 48
Posts: 942
Take care with the timing, I lass at the college last year got her XP 2 developed in bog standard B&W stuff, the tutor assumed it was FP4, results were a scrap film . Think it went clear. C41 dev and process times times are usually 3:15 at 38 degrees, followed by stop/wash/bleach fix for six minutes .

If your going to try it, and curiosity tells me that I hope you do, be prepared to discard the used chemistry to be on the safe side. Oh, and if it works post some samples.

Worth noting that Diafine is not on the menu in the UK in any quantity.

Fred
__________________
Bessa L & R, M7 and a bunch of bottles, MF and SLR stuff.
Fred is the cat. R.I.P. Tony S is the name
Phreds Photos
My Gallery
Usin up the future
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #5
taffer
void
 
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
Hey Steph thanks for the link and thanks for the info Paul ! So it's doable after all ! Paul I think the site you mention is the one from Gene M and his classics, isn't it ?

So I guess this puts me with some interesting experiments to do this summer Do you know if it's needed to wash film prior to development to get rid of the base or something ?

Pls let me know how it goes if you finally take the step, I'll do the same. Will need some tests to find the 'best' exposure and I wonder if times for Diafine are the same with the color emulsion...

Time for sperimentin

Again, thanks !

Oscar
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #6
einolu
Registered User
 
einolu is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 778
Yeah, I was planning on dunking some generic color film in diafine any day now. If anything at all happeneds I will make a post about it or something, heh.

ps: as for the lomo pictures, can someone attatch them to this thread, I dont feel like registering...
__________________

einarsodinecs.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #7
afaceinthecrowd
AKA - Dan Wilkin
 
afaceinthecrowd's Avatar
 
afaceinthecrowd is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Victoria - Canada
Posts: 80
Here you go ... kind of black and blue

dan
__________________
Buying a Nikon doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a Nikon owner. - Author Unknown
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #8
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
I was planning on asking about this too - I have a couple of rolls of expired T400CN that I'd prefer not to pay to get dunked. I'll have to drop them into diafine and just see what happens...

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-10-2005   #9
Krasnaya_Zvezda
Fotoapparat Kollektor
 
Krasnaya_Zvezda's Avatar
 
Krasnaya_Zvezda is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: This Island Earth
Posts: 527
Quote:
Originally Posted by wlewisiii
I was planning on asking about this too - I have a couple of rolls of expired T400CN that I'd prefer not to pay to get dunked. I'll have to drop them into diafine and just see what happens...

William
I am very interested in seeing your results, as I have just acquired my first supply of diafine, and I have some very old rolls of C41 that I can experiment with.
__________________
Водка н тоник, пожалуйста.

"Don't think, even--- the brain is a bit dangerous..."
--- Henri Cartier-Bresson

KZ
_______________________

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2005   #10
Kin Lau
Registered User
 
Kin Lau is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,689
I've dev'd old C41 in Rodinal, very foggy, but workable. Judging by the clothing styles, it was probably shot in the 70's.
__________________
Of course I have a photographic memory: over exposed, under developed, grainy and out of focus

<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=583'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #11
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
Well, that was interesting I just did a roll of T400CN in diafine. The A solution now has a tint very similar to that of the B solution and the back of the film is obviously that usual color film orange, but the images look good. It's still drying so I'll have to scan something from it later.

Now off to do the roll of Tri-X forgotten about from last summer.

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #12
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,936
Ugly, grainy, icky. Depends on the maker. Do not recommend it. With the passing of years the image will fade.
__________________
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #13
taffer
void
 
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
Well seems you were faster than me finally William ! Btw thanks for the update Gabriel, I already heard of grainy ugly grain with XP2 in Diafine, but didn't know that the image will fade...
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #14
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
I think the fading is the fading inherent in C41 film. None of it IIUC is as stable as Kodachrome much less traditional BW film. I've done a roll of XP2 as well and I'd say this looks a bit better from looking at the negs held up to the kitchen window (of course, being 6x6 that's a bit simpler to do than if it were 35mm )

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #15
T_om
Registered User
 
T_om's Avatar
 
T_om is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 701
Quote:
Originally Posted by wlewisiii
I think the fading is the fading inherent in C41 film.

True, for C-41 process film that is processed C-41. In that case you are talking about dye substitution and the fading inherent in such processes.

However, processing C-41 as B&W leaves the silver on the film, it is never bleached out. C-41 should last (if properly fixed and washed) just as long as regular B&W film.

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #16
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,936
About three years ago I processed some TN-400 or whatever you call it (I don't like it, can you tell) in D-76, and now it's faded so much it's very flat. It was a test roll, so I've never cried over it.

These, though, come from an XP2 roll I processed in Diafine by accident. Yes; I spooled it from a roll and did not label the canister; time passed and I thought it was plain old TJ-Max 400. ... behold the hall of shame...
__________________
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2005   #17
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
Ok, thanks for the information. I did this simply to know if it worked - I was curious as a result of Taffer's OP. So I used a test roll and I do think it looks better than the XP2 did. However, it's not something I intend to do very often... But for well outdated C41 film that I've not done anything important with, it's an interesting experiment.

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-18-2010   #18
raytoei@gmail.com
Registered User
 
raytoei@gmail.com's Avatar
 
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,839
I do a bit of XP-2 development in Rodinal (less than 15 rolls), and I like the tone, contrast, grain (lack of) very much.

http://retro.ms11.net/kook.jpg

(The above is untouched, except for resizing, rated at 200)

I am still in the experiment phase and trying out the films, I read somewhere that BW400CN works with Rodinal as well. I just bought 2 rolls ...
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Argh! Photo Processing Frustration bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 32 05-15-2006 05:25
Has anyone tried this Ilford B&W Processing service for UK? terence Rangefinder Photography Discussion 12 03-17-2005 18:02
If the Fuji Frontier can print in grayscale, is there any reason to use C41 B&W film? Dean Rangefinder Photography Discussion 10 03-05-2005 20:47
I wrote a how-to for B&W film processing bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 35 11-28-2004 18:50
Which B&W film - if I'm not processing? st3ph3nm Rangefinder Photography Discussion 23 11-02-2004 14:52



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.