| Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. . |
 |
Processing C41 in B&W chemicals, what happens ? |
 |
06-10-2005
|
#1
|
|
void
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
|
Processing C41 in B&W chemicals, what happens ?
Hi all,
first of all, this is a question completely out from ignorance, as I really have no idea of the potential mess that this could be
But as I just got a 'free' can with 100ft of color film (probably outdated) with my bulk loader, I've been thinking about possible sperimentin with it...
In fact, Ilford XP2 is a C41 B&W film but can be processed in normal black & white chemicals (at least the Diafine box says so) even though seems the results are not very ... pleasant. To sum up, is it physically possible to develop a C41 color film in B&W (maybe with a previous water wash or something) or would it result in permanent damage/mess to film/chemicals/tank ? Would be happy to hear stories if somebody has tried that...
TIA
Oscar
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#2
|
|
Mental Experimental.
Stephanie Brim is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Iowa
Age: 30
Posts: 2,881
|
They turn out black and white...generally. It often produces interesting results. Someone did it at the Lomo.us forums here: http://www.lomo.us/forums/showthread.php?t=8065
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
06-10-2005
|
#3
|
|
Trying to get it right
pshinkaw is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,345
|
Oscar:
I've been thinking about doing the same thing. Somewhere there is a website of "found films". The owner takes old film he has found in cameras and develops them to see what mysteries unfold. He does Kodacolor in Accutol and gets pretty decent B&W negatives. I e-mailed him for some details, and he sent me this:
Kodacolor in Accutol for B&W negatives:
10 minutes in Accutol 1:10 - 20c. Water stop bath, alkaline fixer (Photographers Formulary,) wash in running water for a few minutes. Photo-flo and hang in the bathroom.
But he pointed out that most other B&W chemicals will work too.
There is some info on Photo-Net as well.
I've been getting terrible results from color labs developing 126 and 110 film from cameras that used to give me superb results, Kodak Pocket Instamatics and 126 instamatices with Ektar lenses. I'm planning on testing out thisprocess with some Accutol and 110 Kodacolor one of these days.
-Paul
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=117'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
 |
06-10-2005
|
#4
|
|
Feline Great
Fred is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Chippenham Wiltshire England
Age: 48
Posts: 942
|
Take care with the timing, I lass at the college last year got her XP 2 developed in bog standard B&W stuff, the tutor assumed it was FP4, results were a scrap film  . Think it went clear. C41 dev and process times times are usually 3:15 at 38 degrees, followed by stop/wash/bleach fix for six minutes  .
If your going to try it, and curiosity tells me that I hope you do, be prepared to discard the used chemistry to be on the safe side. Oh, and if it works post some samples.
Worth noting that Diafine is not on the menu in the UK in any quantity.
Fred
__________________
Bessa L & R, M7 and a bunch of bottles, MF and SLR stuff.
Fred is the cat. R.I.P. Tony S is the name
Phreds Photos
My Gallery
Usin up the future
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#5
|
|
void
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
|
Hey Steph thanks for the link and thanks for the info Paul ! So it's doable after all ! Paul I think the site you mention is the one from Gene M and his classics, isn't it ?
So I guess this puts me with some interesting experiments to do this summer  Do you know if it's needed to wash film prior to development to get rid of the base or something ?
Pls let me know how it goes if you finally take the step, I'll do the same. Will need some tests to find the 'best' exposure and I wonder if times for Diafine are the same with the color emulsion...
Time for sperimentin
Again, thanks !
Oscar
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
einolu is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 778
|
Yeah, I was planning on dunking some generic color film in diafine any day now. If anything at all happeneds I will make a post about it or something, heh.
ps: as for the lomo pictures, can someone attatch them to this thread, I dont feel like registering...
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#7
|
|
AKA - Dan Wilkin
afaceinthecrowd is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Victoria - Canada
Posts: 80
|
Here you go ... kind of black and blue
dan
__________________
Buying a Nikon doesn't make you a photographer. It makes you a Nikon owner. - Author Unknown
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#8
|
|
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
|
I was planning on asking about this too - I have a couple of rolls of expired T400CN that I'd prefer not to pay to get dunked. I'll have to drop them into diafine and just see what happens...
William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures
Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.
"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
|
|
|
|
06-10-2005
|
#9
|
|
Fotoapparat Kollektor
Krasnaya_Zvezda is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: This Island Earth
Posts: 527
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wlewisiii
I was planning on asking about this too - I have a couple of rolls of expired T400CN that I'd prefer not to pay to get dunked. I'll have to drop them into diafine and just see what happens...
William
|
I am very interested in seeing your results, as I have just acquired my first supply of diafine, and I have some very old rolls of C41 that I can experiment with.
__________________
Водка н тоник, пожалуйста.
"Don't think, even--- the brain is a bit dangerous..."
--- Henri Cartier-Bresson
KZ
_______________________
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
06-13-2005
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Kin Lau is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 1,689
|
I've dev'd old C41 in Rodinal, very foggy, but workable. Judging by the clothing styles, it was probably shot in the 70's.
__________________
Of course I have a photographic memory: over exposed, under developed, grainy and out of focus
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=583'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#11
|
|
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
|
Well, that was interesting  I just did a roll of T400CN in diafine. The A solution now has a tint very similar to that of the B solution and the back of the film is obviously that usual color film orange, but the images look good. It's still drying so I'll have to scan something from it later.
Now off to do the roll of Tri-X forgotten about from last summer.
William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures
Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.
"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#12
|
|
My Red Dot Glows For You
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,936
|
Ugly, grainy, icky. Depends on the maker. Do not recommend it. With the passing of years the image will fade.
__________________
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).
My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#13
|
|
void
taffer is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: BCN
Age: 36
Posts: 3,460
|
Well seems you were faster than me finally William ! Btw thanks for the update Gabriel, I already heard of grainy ugly grain with XP2 in Diafine, but didn't know that the image will fade...
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#14
|
|
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
|
I think the fading is the fading inherent in C41 film. None of it IIUC is as stable as Kodachrome much less traditional BW film. I've done a roll of XP2 as well and I'd say this looks a bit better from looking at the negs held up to the kitchen window (of course, being 6x6 that's a bit simpler to do than if it were 35mm  )
William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures
Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.
"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
T_om is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 701
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by wlewisiii
I think the fading is the fading inherent in C41 film.
|
True, for C-41 process film that is processed C-41. In that case you are talking about dye substitution and the fading inherent in such processes.
However, processing C-41 as B&W leaves the silver on the film, it is never bleached out. C-41 should last (if properly fixed and washed) just as long as regular B&W film.
Tom
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#16
|
|
My Red Dot Glows For You
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,936
|
About three years ago I processed some TN-400 or whatever you call it (I don't like it, can you tell) in D-76, and now it's faded so much it's very flat. It was a test roll, so I've never cried over it.
These, though, come from an XP2 roll I processed in Diafine by accident. Yes; I spooled it from a roll and did not label the canister; time passed and I thought it was plain old TJ-Max 400. ... behold the hall of shame...
__________________
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).
My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
|
|
|
|
06-14-2005
|
#17
|
|
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
|
Ok, thanks for the information. I did this simply to know if it worked - I was curious as a result of Taffer's OP. So I used a test roll and I do think it looks better than the XP2 did. However, it's not something I intend to do very often...  But for well outdated C41 film that I've not done anything important with, it's an interesting experiment.
William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures
Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.
"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
|
|
|
|
02-18-2010
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
raytoei@gmail.com is offline
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,839
|
I do a bit of XP-2 development in Rodinal (less than 15 rolls), and I like the tone, contrast, grain (lack of) very much.
http://retro.ms11.net/kook.jpg
(The above is untouched, except for resizing, rated at 200)
I am still in the experiment phase and trying out the films, I read somewhere that BW400CN works with Rodinal as well. I just bought 2 rolls ...
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:06. |
|
|