Wasting water
Old 06-14-2009   #1
Yoricko
Registered User
 
Yoricko's Avatar
 
Yoricko is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Wasting water

Every time I develop my own B&W films, I feel that I'm wasting quite a bit of water. (Even though I have a bucket that contains used water from rinsing my film and developing tank stuffs that I use to clean the house) My session always send with a bucket half-filled (2-3 litres I think).

Am I wasting too much water or is it always like that?
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #2
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 921
3 litres seems about right :

Today for 2x120 I used :
1 litre pre-wash, 1 litre purified + 20ml rodinal , stop (re-used), fix (re-used), ~ 10 x 1 litre rinse and 1 litre purified wash agent (re-used).

10 litres ( 1x 35mm would be 1/3 of that )
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #3
hans voralberg
Registered User
 
hans voralberg's Avatar
 
hans voralberg is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Birmingham, UK & Hochiminh, Vietnam
Posts: 2,054
Use the rinsing water to water you plants perhaps, save the environment in some way. Dont use the fixer or developer though, they kill plants.
__________________
Bodies: Leica IIIf - Leica M3 SS - M6 Classic - M6 Black TTL - M8 - VC Bessa R2M
Lens: VC Skopar 21/4 II - VC Skopar 35/2.5 - Summar 50/2 - Summicron DR 50/2 - Elmar 50/3.5 pre-war uncoated - Summarit 50/1.5 - Summitar 50/2 - VC Heliar 50/2 - Nikkor S.C 50/1.4 - Canon LTM 50/1.2 - Nikkor P.C 85/2

My Flickr

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #4
Yoricko
Registered User
 
Yoricko's Avatar
 
Yoricko is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by hans voralberg View Post
Use the rinsing water to water you plants perhaps, save the environment in some way. Dont use the fixer or developer though, they kill plants.
I use that bucket of water to mop the floor. And it usually contains very diluted fixer/dev (from the rinse after the fixer/dev time ends).

FrozenInTime: 10 litres?! o_o
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #5
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 921
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoricko View Post
FrozenInTime: 10 litres?! o_o
I'm 5 minutes into the second film pair of the day now and hope for a third later.
30 litres down the drain : but at least it's raining, complete with passing thunderstorms, here in Edinburgh at the moment.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #6
visiondr
cyclic iconoclast
 
visiondr's Avatar
 
visiondr is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 1,247
I'm in Portland, Oregon - home of >100 cm per year of rainfall. Do I need to conserve here? Even so, I use the Ilford film washing method:

"Alternatively, fill the spiral tank with water at the
same temperature, +/– 5oC (9oF), as the
processing solutions and invert it five times. Drain
the water away and refill. Invert the tank ten times.
Once more drain the water away and refill.
Finally, invert the tank twenty times and drain the
water away." (from the Ilford publication: "Processing your first B&W film")
__________________
Ron


“The enemy of art is the absence of limitations.”
Orson Welles

flickr (visiondrawn)

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #7
Fotohuis
Registered User
 
Fotohuis's Avatar
 
Fotohuis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 679
In Holland: Enough water, sometimes a bit too much.

Ilford method:
http://www.geocities.com/researchtri...gra.html#fwash
__________________
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"



  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #8
jmcd
Registered User
 
jmcd's Avatar
 
jmcd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 601
You are making a conscientious effort to use a minimum of water to do something you value, so you are not wasting it. And then you are using the water one more time. That's admirable.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #9
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,988
ho hum... wait till you start washing prints....
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #10
Al Kaplan
Registered User
 
Al Kaplan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 70
Posts: 4,561
Here in South Florida we do have times when we're on water restrictions but overall we have too much. Still, I try to minimize water use, and the wash water is used on plants along with the used water from my clothes washer. After 42 years of this the plants are thriving.

I'm sure that some of the everday "cleaning products" that get into the sewer in my neighborhood alone put a lot more "poisons" into the environment than I do.

Years ago we used mercury intensifier to save thin negatives and potasium ferracyanide to lighten dense ones or brighten the whites in prints. As for silver it's an effective antibiotic, so getting your hands wet in the tray full of silver laden used fixer just might be keeping you healthier.
__________________
RIP

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #11
Fotohuis
Registered User
 
Fotohuis's Avatar
 
Fotohuis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 679
Quote:
Years ago we used mercury intensifier to save thin negatives and potasium ferracyanide to lighten dense ones or brighten the whites in prints
Well instead of mercury intensifier for thin negatives you can better redo the exposure

..... and for Potassium Ferracyanide to lighten dense negatives or prints you can use Potassium Permanganate and Sulfuric Acid instead.
__________________
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"



  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #12
Al Kaplan
Registered User
 
Al Kaplan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 70
Posts: 4,561
You can't redo exposures for one-time happenings half a century ago. We used what we had.
__________________
RIP

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #13
Yoricko
Registered User
 
Yoricko's Avatar
 
Yoricko is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 88
Thanks for all the replies, it seems like having half a small bucket of water after developing is kinda normal. At least I'm using the water to mop the floor.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #14
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 15,821
I'm very fortunate that all my film developing takes place in a separate small shed away from the main house. It has it's own gravity fed water supply collected from the roof of the shed and with the rainfall we've had here lately the 1000 gallon tank is constantly overflowing ... running the tap for fifteen minutes to wash a film is a guilt free experience!
__________________
---------------------------
zenfolio

flickr ... currently all images from the DP2M
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2009   #15
nikon_sam
Shooter of Film...
 
nikon_sam's Avatar
 
nikon_sam is online now
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Alta Loma, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 3,796
I use running water for about 5-8 minutes for the final rinse then let the film sit in water for as long as it takes to clear it...
I don't like wasting water either...sometimes I'll use the rinse water to water some plants...I do the same with the rinse water when printing...
__________________
Sam
"tongue tied & twisted
just an earthbound misfit...I..."
pf
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2009   #16
Chuck Albertson
Registered User
 
Chuck Albertson is online now
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 433
Like visiondr, I use the Ilford method for most films. It was developed after a nasty drought in the UK in 1976; we had the same drought in Seattle, which led to water use restrictions, and I've used the method ever since. It doesn't seem to do the trick with T-Max and Delta films, though, which generally require a running-water wash to get rid of the dyes in the emulsion.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2009   #17
Chris101
Lytro Shooter
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,647
Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Kaplan View Post
... As for silver it's an effective antibiotic, so getting your hands wet in the tray full of silver laden used fixer just might be keeping you healthier.
It's antibiotic action is exactly the problem, as the treatment of waste water relies on an anaerobic action of bacteria to break down the 'biodegradable waste'. If enough heavy metal is flushed, the bacteria in the treatment tanks dies, leaving the sewage untreated.

As for using silver as a personal bactericide, it accumulates in the liver and other organs leading to chronic health problems.
__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2009   #18
Freakscene
I've chosen darkness
 
Freakscene's Avatar
 
Freakscene is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Zone I
Posts: 1,104
I live in the driest State of the driest continent, though Keith has experienced harsher water restrictions than we have had enforced here. I use more water than that when I develop. I use everything apart from the used developer and fix and a small bucket that I do a quick rinse in immediately after the film comes out of the fix but before it gets washed to water plants. They are mostly vegetables that we eat. They grow well and when I had them tested for residues (just to check) there was nothing that could be attributed to my B&W photography habit. B&W photography just uses water, unfortunately.

Marty
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #19
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pablito View Post
ho hum... wait till you start washing prints....
I was just about to say

For Fiber-based papers: One hour of continuous water flow (30 min. if you use Hypo-clearing stuff).
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #20
martin s
Registered User
 
martin s's Avatar
 
martin s is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,019


Just wanted to mention this thing.. Jobo cascade, was about 10 Euros. Genius, I think I'm saving water but haven't measured it yet. I'm not really sure how long it takes to get the negs clean, I'm pretty sure I'm overdoing it still.

martin
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #21
Chriscrawfordphoto
Real Men Shoot Film.
 
Chriscrawfordphoto's Avatar
 
Chriscrawfordphoto is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, Indiana
Age: 37
Posts: 5,925
Here in Indiana it rains all the time and my city has 3 rivers and probably 20 small streams running through it. I don't worry too much about using water, I want my film washed correctly. It still uses less water than taking a shower, and we all do that every day, right? So if I develop film once a week or so I am not using much water.
__________________
Christopher Crawford
Fine Art Photography
Fort Wayne, Indiana

Back home again in Indiana

http://www.chriscrawfordphoto.com

My Technical Info pages: Film Developing times, scanning, printing, editing.

Like My Work on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #22
Fotohuis
Registered User
 
Fotohuis's Avatar
 
Fotohuis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 679
Quote:
Just wanted to mention this thing.. Jobo cascade, was about 10 Euros. Genius, I think I'm saving water but haven't measured it yet. I'm not really sure how long it takes to get the negs clean
It reduces the water usage a little bit but it takes 10 minutes to wash the negatives.
Jobo Cascade doesn't take any advantage of the diffusion.
__________________
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"



  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #23
palec
Registered User
 
palec's Avatar
 
palec is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Posts: 502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fotohuis View Post
It reduces the water usage a little bit but it takes 10 minutes to wash the negatives.
Jobo Cascade doesn't take any advantage of the diffusion.
Instructions say the washing needed is 3 minutes.
I combine the cascade with water stand - 2-3 minutes with cascade and then 30 minutes stand in water dumping the tank every 10 minutes.
__________________
flickr photostream
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2009   #24
martin s
Registered User
 
martin s's Avatar
 
martin s is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,019
I wash for about 5 minutes and their perfectly clean. 10 minutes is overkill imo, I'll try 3 minutes next.

martin
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-17-2009   #25
Fotohuis
Registered User
 
Fotohuis's Avatar
 
Fotohuis is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 679
Why should a Cascade wash quicker then any regular tube?

The diffusion process can not speed up by this accessoiry. The Cascade fits nice on the tank and is injecting water and air to the bottom of the tank. If you put a tube to the bottom of the tank you have the same effect.

BTW I am selling this item in my web shop so I know from 41 years experience that 3 minutes is not enough to flush out any B&W film at room temperature (20 degrees C.).

The Cascade is very easy to flush any E6 or C41 film in 3-4 minutes on 37,8 degrees C.
Doing that with a B&W film ended by fix on approx. 20 degrees C you will have reticulation due to the sudden temperature difference.
__________________
"De enige beperking in je fotografie ben je zelf"



  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:56.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.