Old 12-03-2009   #26
imush
Registered User
 
imush is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 255
I tried this again with Neopan 1600 exposed at 800. The film was expired by a year or so, and I think it caused a bit of fog (unexposed film a shade darker than usual), but otherwise I like the result.

Xtol 1:4 + Rodinal 1:100, 9 min.



and some more here.
__________________
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Any New Revelations Regarding This Topic??
Old 03-16-2010   #27
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,169
Any New Revelations Regarding This Topic??

Thought it worth asking after months gone by.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-16-2010   #28
Turtle
Registered User
 
Turtle is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,463
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwcolor View Post
Thought it worth asking after months gone by.
At a personal level I have found that I now rarely develop D100 or Foma 100 in anything else now. Depending on the subject and format I either do D100 in Xtol 1+2 + 1:100 or with 1+200. The latter gives a very subtle addition to the bite but it is there. Foma 100, simply because this is where I started experimenting, I do at 1+3 + 1:100 and the results are lovely.

After a bit of thought and messing about in the darkroom I have decided that I don't find the tonality of Rodinal alone ideal under most circumstances. There is something about it that even when the print goes down fine and the image is right, there is a coldness/hardness to the look of the print.... even on warmtone papers! It must be a tonal scale thing, but mixing the devs seems to alleviate this and give more conventional tonality, which I prefer. The rodinal can help inject some of the rodinal highlight sparkle into prints but without sacrificing too much by way of juicy mid tones, which I find Rodinal weak on. In 120 I find these mixed devs even more important as D100 in 120 is so fine grained in Xtol alone that it can almost go looking digital.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1543'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-20-2010   #29
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,841
Works (1:1/1:00) with TMY-2, as well.

__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2010   #30
bwcolor
Registered User
 
bwcolor is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 2,169
Tried Xtol 1+1, Rodinal 1:100, Neopan 400, 8.5min at 68 deg. I should say the roll was without meter.. so with metering time might adjust a bit. Promising.. thanks

Last edited by bwcolor : 03-24-2010 at 20:12.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.