Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 : Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. This is a great resource for new owners seeking information about the Leica M8, M8.2 and M9.

Main Menu
:






The Forums

M9 in 2010. Target price same as m8.2
Old 05-08-2009   #1
eleskin
Registered User
 
eleskin is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 541
M9 in 2010. Target price same as m8.2

In reading the L Camera Forum thread on the future of the digital M, some of the responders had information on the M9:

The M9 will have a target price as the same as the current M8.2

It will be at least 14-18MP

There will be a special IR filter.

Full Frame.

Will be announced after Photokina 2010.

God I hope this is true!!! If so, I am really excited!!!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #2
dof
fiat lux
 
dof's Avatar
 
dof is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: san francisco, americaland
Posts: 425
The folks on the Leica Forum must be having a field day over the news. I got a Server Too Busy message when trying to log on.

All film fanaticism aside (and I do admit to being a zealot at times), announcements of new and updated digital bodies are so close to an everyday occurrence that I find it difficult to get too excited about any of them.

Given the stature that the M system holds in Leica's portfolio of products, the M9 is simply an inevitability. The features mentioned have been so strongly intimated in interviews with Dr. Kaufmann that there's so surprises there either. Any breaks from the traditional feature set would be truly interesting news.

No matter what the design details, it will be interesting to see how maintaining enthusiasm for the new body until Photokina in 2010 will play out.
__________________
-J.
---------------------------------------------------------------
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #3
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 284
A significant proportion of development costs of the M9 ( e.g. payments to Kodak upfront for R&D of custom sensor) would have started long before Lee departed and the financial bubble burst.
Switching to M9 pilot production rather than M8.2 production as early as possible might be the best way to handle the financial balance if M8.2 sales volumes are depressed due to speculation and recession.

Lee's leak was a year too early, but a official leak now might be intentional ?
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #4
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 2,680
No disrespect, but "Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah....."
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #5
FrozenInTime
Registered User
 
FrozenInTime is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norcal
Posts: 284
What's the harm in a bit of armchair directing ?
None of us really know the facts (and those that do are probably subject to NDAs) so recycling prior rumors is the game.
Perhaps there should be a 'speculation forum' that can be taken with the appropriate level of skepticism or just ignored if you think you've heard it all before.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #6
thinkfloyd
Flippy Nose
 
thinkfloyd's Avatar
 
thinkfloyd is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: QC, Philippines
Posts: 314
Using an RD-1 now, I will keep an eye on these rumors. I feel upgrading to the M8 or M8.2 is not justifiable. But with the M9? We'll see Besides, "9" is my lucky number haha... hoping I'll be lucky enough to afford it when it comes out!
__________________
Franz

my flickr
M8 + 35mm, 50mm, 75mm
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #7
newsgrunt
Registered User
 
newsgrunt's Avatar
 
newsgrunt is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 336
A Leica dealer referred to an M9 as if it was common knowledge when we were just chatting about Leica this 'n' that. Perhaps he thought telling someone who wanted to get a second MP was safe, dunno. More recently, a Leica official just smiled when I recounted this meeting. ymmv of course.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #8
Double Negative
Canon DSLR Refugee
 
Double Negative's Avatar
 
Double Negative is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,155
If you want full frame now, count downwards. M7.
__________________
Leica M8, M9 & Zeiss Ikon; CV 1,2/35 Nokton, 3,5/28, 2,5/35 and 2,5/50 Color Skopars, Leica 2,8/90 Elmarit-M
Zeiss ZM 4/18 Distagon, 2,8/25 Biogon, 2/35 Biogon, 1,5/50 Sonnar and 2/50 Planar
Mamiya 7II; N50mm f/4.5L, N65mm f/4L, N80mm f/4L and N150mm f/4.5L
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #9
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,954
A FF M9 would significantly sink the price of the used M8.2's then on the market if it sold for the same price as the 8.2 does now. This would be a different experience for M users. And used M8's. Might be some real bargains out there. M8's for $1,000? (I love speculating on rumors
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #10
Al Kaplan
Registered User
 
Al Kaplan is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Miami, FL
Age: 67
Posts: 4,628
I think that it's time to order some more 400 foot rolls of Eastman 5222 and fill up the freezer.
__________________
RIP

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #11
sonofdanang
Working Practitioner
 
sonofdanang is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Heading from the Slave Lake region to Vancouver
Posts: 580
Ha ha! Al, you made my day, man. As a guy with a digital income stream and a film body of personal work, I totally relate to the film/freezer comment.

I like 18mm FOV. I own a 12mm Heliar. I like that field of view too.
I like color in digital. For panchromes - sorry, it's gonna be film until I like what I see in digital. For now, my dSLR is a back up solution to film.

Bring on the M9. It will have the correct effect on the pricing of the M8, 8.2, and RD-1(s).
__________________
http://www.shane-adams.com


  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #12
DougFord
keeping it realish
 
DougFord's Avatar
 
DougFord is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
A FF M9 would significantly sink the price of the used M8.2's then on the market if it sold for the same price as the 8.2 does now. This would be a different experience for M users. And used M8's. Might be some real bargains out there. M8's for $1,000? (I love speculating on rumors
Leica's new found business strategy - Planned obsolescence
__________________

Bentnub
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #13
5:00 PM
It's a light machine
 
5:00 PM's Avatar
 
5:00 PM is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 85
I'll never own either, but I don't think a full frame M would completely obsolete the M8. It will be like the Nikon D3/D300 relationship (very popular among Nikon pros) where the lenses do dual-focal length duty depending on which body you choose to use.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #14
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 2,397
IF this rumor is true, its actually very bad news for Leica that someone let out this news early -- before an official annoucement at Photokina 2010.

Leica dealers are already very unhappy with poor 8.2 sales demand. This rumor will likely just about kill 8.2 sales. Leica has to stay alive and pay the bills long enough to make the M9. Dead 8.2 sales with the impending M9 release will only make profits far worse than they would have been otherwise. Just like releasing the M8 before it was ready for market, Leica corporate is often its own worst enemy.

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #15
gdi
Registered User
 
gdi's Avatar
 
gdi is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: West-Central Connecticut
Posts: 1,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by nikonhswebmaster View Post
I think that speculation of this kind is rather silly in the face of a European recession.

I know everyone who owns an M8 believes Dr. K has unlimited deep pockets, but there is a bottom to all money bins.

TARP Funds maybe?
__________________
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines." - Ralph Waldo Emerson
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #16
Keith
Registered User
 
Keith's Avatar
 
Keith is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,771
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameraQuest View Post
IF this rumor is true, its actually very bad news for Leica that someone let out this news early -- before an official annoucement at Photokina 2010.

Leica dealers are already very unhappy with poor 8.2 sales demand. This rumor will likely just about kill 8.2 sales. Leica has to stay alive and pay the bills long enough to make the M9. Dead 8.2 sales with the impending M9 release will only make profits far worse than they would have been otherwise. Just like releasing the M8 before it was ready for market, Leica corporate is often its own worst enemy.

Stephen

Look out for some great 8.2 deals ... surely?

They're no good to anyone sitting around not being used!
__________________
zenfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #17
BillBlackwell
Registered User
 
BillBlackwell's Avatar
 
BillBlackwell is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Orange County, CA
Age: 52
Posts: 749
Quote:
Originally Posted by eleskin View Post
In reading the L Camera Forum thread on the future of the digital M, some of the responders had information on the M9...
There are responders right here in this forum with information on the M9, but they live in Fantasy Land too.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #18
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue's Avatar
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by CameraQuest View Post
IF this rumor is true, its actually very bad news for Leica that someone let out this news early -- before an official annoucement at Photokina 2010.

Leica dealers are already very unhappy with poor 8.2 sales demand. This rumor will likely just about kill 8.2 sales. Leica has to stay alive and pay the bills long enough to make the M9. Dead 8.2 sales with the impending M9 release will only make profits far worse than they would have been otherwise. Just like releasing the M8 before it was ready for market, Leica corporate is often its own worst enemy.

Stephen
Yes, this is why I find it difficult to believe it's a deliberate leak.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #19
Pickett Wilson
Registered User
 
Pickett Wilson is offline
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,954
It's not quite the same relationship as the D3/D300. By the time of this "speculated" release, the M8 sensor will be six years old. I think a FF M9 would pretty much kill the earlier cameras as far as resale value.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #20
robklurfield
eclipse
 
robklurfield's Avatar
 
robklurfield is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 50
Posts: 5,666
If an M9 comes out at the same price as the M8.2, Leica can clear their excess of inventory of 8.2's by giving them free with the purchase of a new Noctilux.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #21
aizan
Registered User
 
aizan's Avatar
 
aizan is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Torrance, CA
Age: 28
Posts: 3,117
fat chance this is a real leak, especially since photokina is more than a year away...and who are these "responders"?
__________________
"But I'll say this: A year with a single Leica and a single lens, looking at light and ignoring color, will teach you as much about actually seeing photographs as three years in any photo school, and as much as ten or fifteen years (or more) of mucking about buying and selling and shopping for gear like the average hobbyist."
—Mike Johnston
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #22
digitalintrigue
modern vintage
 
digitalintrigue's Avatar
 
digitalintrigue is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickett Wilson View Post
It's not quite the same relationship as the D3/D300. By the time of this "speculated" release, the M8 sensor will be six years old. I think a FF M9 would pretty much kill the earlier cameras as far as resale value.
Just like all digitals. This is why I don't buy high end digitals anymore.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #23
DougFord
keeping it realish
 
DougFord's Avatar
 
DougFord is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 296
‘Speculating on a hypothesis ‘
If it’s not one thing it’s another.
On one hand you have used M8 prices that continue to fall and now on the other you have a possible FFM9 announcement in 2010.
Perhaps poor M8.2 sales are also a result of market saturation? Come next year, will ‘inexpensive’ used M8’s be passed around like the RD1 is today? (If it’s not already occurring)
If so, M8 service revenue rather than M8.2 sales could help span the time between now and the release of the M9. I would expect Leica to bundle more service/upgrade packages together. Frame line upgrade/lens coding/CLA packages with extended warranty on second and third hand M8’s.
__________________

Bentnub
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #24
miklosphoto
Registered User
 
miklosphoto's Avatar
 
miklosphoto is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Age: 39
Posts: 66
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Negative View Post
If you want full frame now, count downwards. M7.
I like this one, well said.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-08-2009   #25
Damaso
Photojournalist
 
Damaso's Avatar
 
Damaso is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 833
It will be announced this year. Higher price than the m8.2 and full frame...
__________________
Damaso

My Blog

M6TTL .58
M6TTL .85
M8
50mm Summilux Pre-Asph
90mm Tele-Elmarit
Ultron 35 f1.7
VC 75 f2.5
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.