Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Will a DRF really work with my Planar?
Old 04-24-2009   #1
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 43
Posts: 1,675
Will a DRF really work with my Planar?

Hi Guys,

I really like Zeiss lenses and the 50mm F2 Planar I shoot on my Hexar just blows me away with its crispness and it's ability to give a sense of depth so well.

Recently I have been toying with the idea of of an R-D1 and was lucky enough to be loaned one for an afternoon by a fellow RFF member.

I thought the feel of the R-D1 was great and my initial reaction was 'I gotta get me one of these' however upon getting the shots home I felt that the images just were not up to the quality I'd come to expect when using Zeiss on my Hexar RF.

Now, my questions are: Was it me? Do I need to put in more post production effort to get the most of the Epson's RAW files?
Or could it be that the cameras resolution is just not high enough to successfully render the sharpness obtainable from a planar? I must admit it seems a little low after shooting an Olypus E-420.

Here's a few (albeit low-res) examples of what I mean.

Probably the best shots I got out of the Epson on the day.
1.



2.


An the general quality from the same lens shooting film on my Hexar RF.
1.


2.


3.


I know there's probably not much in it, especially at these sizes, but I'd love to hear from anyone else who shoots Zeiss glass on a M8 or R-D1.

Thanks for reading,

Bob.


Oh, and please forgive me if I've posted this in the wrong forum.
__________________
"We seldom take great pictures. You have to milk the cow a lot and get lots of milk to make a little piece of cheese" Henri Cartier Bresson

Mamiya 7ii, Rolleiflex 3.5F, Yashica-Mat 124G, Fuji GS 645, Fuji X100, Ricoh GR-1, Canon QL25, Zenit ES.


MY WEBSITE
Flickr gallery
RFF
gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2009   #2
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,715
i can't say what quality is good enough for others but you can check out my flickr account to see other zm lenses on an rd1.

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2009   #3
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
In my view, you do need to work the RAWs a little bit with the R-D1. But I do think the R-D1 can equal your film pictures. I actually like the Zeiss 28 Biogon BETTER with the R-D1 than on film!
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2009   #4
Bobfrance
Over Exposed
 
Bobfrance's Avatar
 
Bobfrance is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Lancashire, England
Age: 43
Posts: 1,675
Thanks for the reassurance guys.
Anyone use the 35mm? I'm toying with the idea of getting one.
__________________
"We seldom take great pictures. You have to milk the cow a lot and get lots of milk to make a little piece of cheese" Henri Cartier Bresson

Mamiya 7ii, Rolleiflex 3.5F, Yashica-Mat 124G, Fuji GS 645, Fuji X100, Ricoh GR-1, Canon QL25, Zenit ES.


MY WEBSITE
Flickr gallery
RFF
gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2009   #5
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,715
i prefer the 28 on the rd1.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2009   #6
Krosya
Konicaze
 
Krosya's Avatar
 
Krosya is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 3,676
I have Rd, I have a Hexar RF as well as others. I dont have Planar anymore, but have Hexanons and other lenses. I have ZM 25. While RD delivers some very good results - it doesnt equal film. Well, good film anyway. I prefer results i get on film, but RD is just faster and still very good. It seems that some lenses do better on RD than others -dont know why. I have Hex 28mm and its awsome on both - film and digital. ZM 25 I prefer on film. Hex 50/2 - good on both, yet better on film. etc. I have no idea how to explain it - maybe its me, but maybe its not. Bottom line - I use both - film and digital for different things, so it all works out. But I can tell you, while RD1 is a very very good camera - put some Velvia or another QUALITY slide film in your Hexar - it'll blow RD away!
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
35mm Rangefinders : Hexar RF , Leica M5 and RD1S w/ many M and LTM lenses

Folders
:
Welta Weltur 6x6/645, Welta Weltur 6x9/645


flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:08.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.