Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

neopan 16000
Old 03-07-2009   #1
dfoo
Registered User
 
dfoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,950
neopan 16000

I just developed my first roll of neopan 1600, and I've very impressed! That film is beautiful... I exposed it at 1600 and the grain and tones are very nice. I developed in XTOL 1+1 for 7.5 minutes. The only other fast film I've used is delta 3200, which was much grainier and didn't have nearly as nice tones. Whats more is that the delta 3200 negs were very hard to print, whereas these neopan negatives look very printable on grade 2 paper.

Leica M4-p, summicron 50. F2 1/16


Leica M4-p, ultron 28mm. F1.9 1/16


Leica M4-p, summicron 50. F2 1/30
__________________
M8, M3, ZM Ikon + too many lenses to list.

Some of my work - http://silverprint.posterous.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #2
robert blu
Registered User
 
robert blu's Avatar
 
robert blu is online now
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Italy
Age: 64
Posts: 3,162
16000 ?!? excellent pictures, it must be real satisfying having these pictures in the hands!
well done
rob
__________________
Remember: today is the Day !
from Ruth Bernhard recipe for a long and happy life


the quiet photographer's blog


My RFF photos and my albums on RFF
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #3
dfoo
Registered User
 
dfoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,950
Thanks, but it was 1600, not 16000!
__________________
M8, M3, ZM Ikon + too many lenses to list.

Some of my work - http://silverprint.posterous.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #4
helenhill
MoDeRaToR-To Love & Light
 
helenhill's Avatar
 
helenhill is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,887
Wooohoooo....Lovely
probably my FAV Film neo 1600/ besides the Cheapo arista 400
Sharp.Crisp.Spot On Contrasty
Congrats
will have to try your recipe
Cheers-H
__________________
flickr

  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #5
capitalK
Warrior Poet :P
 
capitalK's Avatar
 
capitalK is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,109
Haha I was going to comment on the "16000" as well. I'd like to try some of that!

Kidding aside, these look very nice. I have used the film but never developed my own. I'd like to try that some day.
__________________
-------------------
Flickr
www.kennetharmstrong.ca
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #6
Michiel Fokkema
Michiel Fokkema
 
Michiel Fokkema's Avatar
 
Michiel Fokkema is online now
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: the Netherlands
Age: 47
Posts: 952
Very nice results indeed. Much better then I usually get. But my film is a bit past bbe date.
In my experience neopan is more contrasty, but I used xtol 1+2. Only getting good results when rated the film at 1000 iso. Lately Ive used DDX which worked better.
I've had good results with Ilford 3200 when shot at 1600 and developed in xtol 1+2.

Keep them coming,

Michiel Fokkema
__________________
Some Pictures
The BLOG
The website
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #7
direwolf101
Registered User
 
direwolf101's Avatar
 
direwolf101 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 657
Very nice dfoo! I'm going to be shooting some Neopan 1600 for the first time next weekend and I hope mine turns out as nice as yours. I'll be developing mine in Edwal FG-7. (My only experience with high speed film so far has been with p3200 and I found it to be quite grainy).
__________________
My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #8
Rob-F
Preserving Old Technology
 
Rob-F's Avatar
 
Rob-F is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: secret midwestern underground bunker
Posts: 3,420
Best tonality and shadow detail I've seen from this film, when exposed at 1600. My results have suggested the true speed is probably 640, with decent results up to 800 or 1000. I'll have to try it in XTOL!
__________________
“There is hardly anything in the world that some man cannot make a little worse and sell a little cheaper, and the people who consider price only are this man's lawful prey.”
--John Ruskin

Last edited by Rob-F : 03-07-2009 at 14:00.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #9
dfoo
Registered User
 
dfoo is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: St. John's, Newfoundland
Posts: 1,950
Thanks all. I'm very pleased... The grain is very pleasing. I like this much better than pushed trix, which I find has little shadow detail. I'll probably try and print a couple of the shots tomorrow, and will let you all know the prints turn out.
__________________
M8, M3, ZM Ikon + too many lenses to list.

Some of my work - http://silverprint.posterous.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #10
mknawabi
photographeur
 
mknawabi's Avatar
 
mknawabi is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Irvine, CA
Age: 23
Posts: 170
May I ask how you usually expose?
__________________
Chrome M6TTL | Summicron 35 f/2 v2
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:55.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.