Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Bigger than 35 RF's > 120 RF Folders

120 RF Folders 120/220 Format Folding Rangefinders, including the various classic Zeiss Ikontas, Voigtlander Bessas, and their Ruskie copies.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Help! Bessa II expert?
Old 03-06-2009   #1
mammolo
Registered User
 
mammolo's Avatar
 
mammolo is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Help! Bessa II expert?

Greetings!
I recently bought a Bessa II that has some quirks that I was not able to see elsewhere on the Web. One is a tiny metal window right between the two RF windows, the second is the presence of two red windows -- and not one --- in the back. As for the latter, does it mean this camera was set up for 6x4.5 as well? If that were the case the serial number does not seem to match, as the camera appears to have been built in 1953 (SN# 3572169) while I read somewhere that only 1956 Bessa IIs were set up for 6x4.5 as well (with the appropriate mask, of course). And what about that funny metal window on the front? I have attached two pictures to explain better what I mean.
Thanks a million for any help you may have...
Cheers!
Marco

  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2009   #2
Solinar
Analog Preferred
 
Solinar's Avatar
 
Solinar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,057
You definitely have what appears to be one of the final Bessa II cameras. First, it has the mounted accessory shoe. Second, it has the VF mask and the second window to allow you to shoot 6x4.5.

Did the camera come with the removable 645 mask for the film gate ?
__________________
- Andrew in Austin, Texas -

35mm Gear Bessa R, Leica II, - IIIf RD/ST, - IIIg, - M3
Medium Format Fuji GW 690III / Minolta Autocord
MF Folders Agfa Record III and Super Isolette / Voigtlander Perkeo II and Bessa II
Digital a D300 with a some primes

"Who spilled the Dektol on the bathroom carpet?"
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2009   #3
chippy
foo was here
 
chippy's Avatar
 
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Marco,
yes, your suspicions are correct, the camera can (with the appropriate mask) take 6x4.5, when you insert the mask (have you got the mask?) both red windows open, you read the number in the first window to begin with and wind on after exposure to the see the same number in the second window e.g 1-2, 2-2, 3-3 and so on. the metal. the funny metal mask for the front window is for 6x4.5 selection as well. when you have put the mask in then flip the viewfinder mask into place so you just see the viewfinder frame for 6x4.5--crude set up but no doubt works--this is the 4th model bessa II (not commonly available),

the first has a round and rectangular window on the front, the second has two retangular windows (like yours) but no accessory shoe on top, the 3rd has the shoe fitted and the 4th has the 6x4.5 back and front flip mask...

what lens have you got? as for the serial number, well i guess its either old stock (which does happen) or someone has swapped it with an older lens...the other posssibility is the back and flip mask are retro fitted, this set up always looked like an aftermarket tacked on thing to me so maybe you could take them in and they would retro fit them to take 6x4.5
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2009   #4
Leigh Youdale
Registered User
 
Leigh Youdale is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,648
My Bessa I has a wheel to turn that changes the viewfinder for 6x4.5 but it's likely that couldn't be fitted to the RF model II and the little swing window is rotated through 180 degrees to frame the field of view. As Chippy says, crude but effective. There were plenty of early folders (pre war) that had only a device like that for their viewfinder.
__________________

Fuji X10
Leica M6
Bessa R4A
Rolleiflex (3): E2 Planar 2.8, WA & Tele
Nikkormat FTn (2)
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-06-2009   #5
mammolo
Registered User
 
mammolo's Avatar
 
mammolo is offline
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 4
Hey, you guys are really great... many thanks.

Andrew in Austin: no, the camera didn't come with the 6x4.5 mask. It's no big deal for me, as I bought the Bessa strictly for 6x9 work (and I am not a collector).

Andrew in Adelaide: the lens is a color skopar. It is in truly excellent shape: no separation, no cleanup marks... Yup, the setup of the front VF mask does look a bit, ahem, "home made", with that rather bulky screw. Your hypotheses re: retrofitting (or having a NOS lens installed) are also good ones.

All right, I am on my way to Venice in a few ours for a weekend of shooting, let's see what comes out of this fascinating camera with some Neopan 400.

Cheers!
__________________
Marco - www.resonantlink.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-07-2009   #6
chippy
foo was here
 
chippy's Avatar
 
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by mammolo View Post
Hey, you guys are really great... many thanks.

Andrew in Austin: no, the camera didn't come with the 6x4.5 mask. It's no big deal for me, as I bought the Bessa strictly for 6x9 work (and I am not a collector).

Andrew in Adelaide: the lens is a color skopar. It is in truly excellent shape: no separation, no cleanup marks... Yup, the setup of the front VF mask does look a bit, ahem, "home made", with that rather bulky screw. Your hypotheses re: retrofitting (or having a NOS lens installed) are also good ones.

All right, I am on my way to Venice in a few ours for a weekend of shooting, let's see what comes out of this fascinating camera with some Neopan 400.

Cheers!
well enjoy yourself in Venice Mammolo, and take plenty of film ! WOW, what photo oppotunities await...i hope you will show a few of Venice--i may never get to see it myself and would love to see some results from the bessa with scopar, it takes a very nice picture

didnt mean to cross post with Andy in Texas, no doubt we were typing at the same time--snap--common interests, and simular sister states from across the water.

in its day the bessa II was far from a cheap camera, but perhaps, i can imagine that some critisim was leveled at it for not taking 6x4.5 as most cameras of previous years had the ability, even though it would no doubt of been purchased, used and wanted for its 6x9. i can only assume or guess about the times back then , but can imagine that in this era 6x9 was coming to an unpopular end...with film quality improving smaller formats are good enough for most happy snaps etc, and 6x9 too exspensive for amature/consumer sales and journo's were using larger format press cameras with systems for the highest quality...apart from the foolish (fom a historical aspect) Ensign mob throwing lots of money into 6x9 development perhaps Viotglander saw the writing on the wall and made the last version bessa with its basic dual format as crude as it is, just to save money and gain a few extra sales....

as opposed to the bessa I with its dial that shifts formats in the viewfinder as well as compensation for close up paralex compensation, its a shame they didnt provide this in the bessa II (just to save costs no doubt, because it could have been) but its still a nice camera, that with its unfinished looks and quirks, speaks of an era past that is still functional and with todays film gives ..outstanding.. results

Show some pics eh!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:10.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.