Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

35mm lens on R3A without external finder?
Old 01-11-2009   #1
zanef2.8
Registered User
 
zanef2.8's Avatar
 
zanef2.8 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 86
35mm lens on R3A without external finder?

Perhaps a stupid question which is often asked

Is it possible to put a 35mm lens on a R3A by switching to 40mm frameline? I would like to do that if possible so that I don't have to use an external viewfinder.

Do I lose a lot of the field of view in the viewfinder?

thanks
__________________
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaneinzane/
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-12-2009   #2
imush
Registered User
 
imush is offline
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York, NY
Age: 41
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by zanef2.8 View Post
Perhaps a stupid question which is often asked

Is it possible to put a 35mm lens on a R3A by switching to 40mm frameline?

Do I lose a lot of the field of view in the viewfinder?
thanks
Certainly possible, but it is a matter of personal taste if you like the arrangement. If you use the full viewfinder (including the slight margin outside the 40mm frame), it will probably be about right.
Since R3A is 1:1, you should be fine if you shoot with both eyes open, and use the full visible area of the viewfinder as as 35mm 'frameline'.

I did not try it personally though. Being obliged to wear spectacles makes the r3 viewfinder inconvenient at the wider framelines, and for that reason I went for R2M. But I have tried R3x viewfinder in the store, and at the time I thought the full viewfinder might be usable as 35mm frameline, and right-eyed users without glasses can use the left eye to see outside the frame.
__________________
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-12-2009   #3
payasam
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
 
payasam's Avatar
 
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
You can get away with it. Just frame your shots tightly. The two lenses are not so different in angular coverage.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6
, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery

  Reply With Quote

Old 01-12-2009   #4
JRG
Registered User
 
JRG is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 324
I'd say you may be able to get away with it.

I think the main issue is not so much the coverage of a 35mm lens vs. that of a 40mm lens, but how easily you can see those 40 framelines. I've got an R3M sitting here, I wear glasses, and I can see the 40 framelines, but only with a little effort. And I'll bet there are other glasses-wearers who would have a lot more trouble than I.

Beg, rent, or borrow an R3x that you can try for a while, to learn whether you can comfortably use those 40 framelines.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-12-2009   #5
zanef2.8
Registered User
 
zanef2.8's Avatar
 
zanef2.8 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 86
Thanks a lot for the answers. I will be getting an R3A soon which comes with a 50 1.5 and I thought I like to add a 35 lens.
__________________
My Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/zaneinzane/
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:30.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.