Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF

Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF A dedicated forum to the first Digital rangefinder camera.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Back focus or rangefinder alignment?
Old 10-12-2008   #1
jmarcus
Registered User
 
jmarcus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 304
Back focus or rangefinder alignment?

Is back focus exclusive to lens adjustment?

I focused on the guy on the left, his eyeball. As you can see the guy on the right is in focus.

thanks,
James
Attached Images
File Type: jpg _EPS0276.jpg (183.0 KB, 37 views)
__________________
Leica M9
Epson R-D1s

Zeiss 35mm f/2.0 Biogon T*
Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton
Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 Nokton
Leica 28mm f/2.8 ASPH
Leica Elmar C 90mm f/4.0
Flickr
=======================
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-12-2008   #2
jmarcus
Registered User
 
jmarcus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 304
Shot with a Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 at 1.5
__________________
Leica M9
Epson R-D1s

Zeiss 35mm f/2.0 Biogon T*
Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton
Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 Nokton
Leica 28mm f/2.8 ASPH
Leica Elmar C 90mm f/4.0
Flickr
=======================
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-12-2008   #3
Catto
Photographer
 
Catto's Avatar
 
Catto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 135
Funny, I've been asking myself the same question about my 50mm f/1.5 on an R-D1s - new (to me) camera, brand new lens, very hard to be sure.

But, I'm reserving judgement on mine, and on this particular image, because I can't be totally sure that I or my subjects (or you & yours, not having been there) didn't move ever so slightly and miss the focus that way. 1.5 is pretty slim DOF, of course - esp. to get two people together sharp on the same plane, I see it all the time with my Canon gear & the 85 1.2. If either you or they shifted a little, even just rebalancing your weight on your feet, that could be enough for what you're seeing in that image.

I think the only way to eliminate the rangefinder alignment question is to check other lenses on your body, and / or that lens on another body, and see if your RF is consistently out with all of them; or if that lens is consistently out with many cameras. Which can be tricky, if there aren't other R-D1s around...

Try shooting some non-moving subjects with the camera on a tripod, and see if you can pin down the problem that way; at least that will tell you if the lens / body combo is wrong, or if it was actually some movement on the night in that particular case.

Hope that helps?
R
__________________
Robert Catto, Photographer
Sydney, NSW Australia
My Blog / Facebook / @robertcatto
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-12-2008   #4
jmarcus
Registered User
 
jmarcus is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Arlington, MA
Posts: 304
I have three other pictures with the same focus, so I don't think its movement. The problem with different lenses is that I don't have another 1.5, just a 2.0 and a 2.8

James
__________________
Leica M9
Epson R-D1s

Zeiss 35mm f/2.0 Biogon T*
Voigtlander 15mm f/4.5 Heliar
Voigtlander 35mm f/1.2 Nokton
Voigtlander 50mm f/1.5 Nokton
Leica 28mm f/2.8 ASPH
Leica Elmar C 90mm f/4.0
Flickr
=======================
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-13-2008   #5
Catto
Photographer
 
Catto's Avatar
 
Catto is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sydney, NSW Australia
Posts: 135
Had another thought this morning, but can't remember where I was reading it - there was a theory being put forward that the direction of rotation you use to achieve focus may, due to play / slop in the focus mechanism of any manual focus lens, mean there was a certain amount of inaccuracy or loss of sharpness.

They were suggesting that you test your lenses by coming towards the point of sharp focus from infinity, and from min. focus distance, to determine which direction gave more accurate results for your particular combination of lens / rangefinder alignment, and this was probably recommended for all your lenses individually.

Personally...it's all a bit hard. Unless I find a huge problem, I can't be arsed doing all that! Up to you whether it's worth testing in this particular case.
R
__________________
Robert Catto, Photographer
Sydney, NSW Australia
My Blog / Facebook / @robertcatto
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 20:20.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.