 |
Anyone see or hear about Epson V900 @ Photokina |
 |
10-08-2008
|
#1
|
|
foo was here
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
|
Anyone see or hear about Epson V900 @ Photokina
I havnt heard boo about it, but this page http://www.ausmedia.com.au/Epson_V900_Photo_Scanner.htm has been up for a little while now (since before Photokina) indicating the V900 is to be released at some point.
Did anyone see an Epson display at Photokina?
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
antistatic is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 257
|
Please, for the love of God,make this be true. It sounds good.
__________________
my flickr
MP, M2, M9, CLE
28 Ultron, 35 Summicron Asph, 35 2.8 Summaron, 40 Rokkor, 50 Summilux Asph, 50 collapsible summicron, 75 Summilux, 90 Rokkor
Rolleiflex 2.8f
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#3
|
|
Benny Ng
bennyng is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Tokyo/Singapore
Posts: 844
|
http://www.epson.jp/products/colorio/scanner/index.htm
They have some pretty nifty scanners in Japan already. Especially the F-3200. Wonder if they will ever be available outside of Japan.
Cheers,
__________________
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#4
|
|
~
peter_n is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 9,130
|
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#5
|
|
The man who shot film
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,774
|
Is it only me or the scanning area is bigger?
At last a possibility of batch scanning 36 frames???
__________________
Michael
Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)
GAS rehab
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
xvvvz is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 132
|
>> Especially the F-3200.<<
That was not very good. It was an attempt by Epson to repackage flatbed components into something that looked more like a dedicated film scanner. Once reviewers got their hands on it, the test results proved it was "more show than go."
>> Is it only me or the scanning area is bigger?<<
If you are looking at the 970, it is the same size and chassis as the 700/750.
Doug
|
|
|
|
10-10-2008
|
#7
|
|
foo was here
chippy is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 802
|
i am wondering because i was thinking of getting the V700 for sheet film and also to use it for 120 film but if the V900 was to arrive sometime in the near future i figured i may as well wait...seems to be a long wait!
|
|
|
|
08-21-2009
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
kram is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Wales, UK
Posts: 286
|
And we are still waiting.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1701'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
08-21-2009
|
#9
|
|
Fokutorendaburando
sevo is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 3,806
|
Waiting for what? GT-X970 is the name for the V750 on the Japanese market, and the F-3200 was a brief marketing attempt sidestepping from the 4490/4990 generation - already superseded by the V series and a dead end in their lineup. That is, there is no new Epson scanner.
|
|
|
|
08-21-2009
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Matus is offline
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Frankfurt, DE
Posts: 1,813
|
Just if the Epson would listen ... how many of us would gladly pay the amount as for the V750 if the scanner TRUE specs would improve a bit, (true resolution of ~ 2700 dpi at 3200 dpi setting and bit better Dynamic range) - they are not that far away ... Many of us shoot films and so many need to scan ...
|
|
|
|
08-21-2009
|
#11
|
|
Personal Photography
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,573
|
It would take a lot more of people turning back to use film to convince these companies to keep producing, let alone improve their scanners. I am just as frustrated as most film users, but I'm no longer holding my breath.
I think my enlarger will outlive my scanners.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:38. |
|
|