Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Non Rangefinder Cameras > Evil SLRs

Evil SLRs For those of you who must talk about SLRs, if only to confirm their evil nature.

Main Menu
:






The Forums
View Poll Results: In my opinion, I feel the Leica S2 is:
Lovely, good looking! 104 34.21%
Ugly! So ugly, give me a break! 27 8.88%
I don't care about its looks. 70 23.03%
I will keep using my M, this is not my style. 103 33.88%
Voters: 304. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 09-22-2008   #26
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 5,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burlap Jacket View Post
It mentions AF in the article above.
Even better, a new AF system, developed by Leica. Not surprising, as Leica is the original inventor of AF, sadly lost to Minolta back then...
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #27
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 5,970
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Negative View Post
Oh my... The specs sound good, certainly. All new lenses though? I have a weird feeling this puppy is/would be heinously pricey.

Lets say about 35.000 $ plus?
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #28
Nh3
-
 
Nh3 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 989
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
Lets say about 35.000 $ plus?
That price is consistent with other medium format DRFs in the market.

But more importantly I would like to know who made the sensor which Leica is using for S2.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #29
abenner
undecided
 
abenner is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Omaha
Posts: 368
is anyone sure this is real?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #30
urban_alchemist
Registered User
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
urban_alchemist is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel/London, UK
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nh3 View Post
But more importantly I would like to know who made the sensor which Leica is using for S2.
Kodak. Says so in the article...
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #31
Solinar
Analog Preferred
 
Solinar's Avatar
 
Solinar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,051
So does this mean that there is a new S mount?
__________________
- Andrew in Austin, Texas -

35mm Gear Bessa R, Leica IIIf RD/ST, IIIg, M3
Medium Format Fuji GW 690III / Minolta Autocord
MF Folders Agfa Record III and Super Isolette / Voigtlander Perkeo II and Bessa II
Digital a D80 with a some fast primes

"Who spilled the Dektol on the bathroom carpet?"
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #32
Ray Nalley
-
 
Ray Nalley is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 305
Well, I'm thinking $30,000 or so is out of my price range. It seems they are leaving us all behind.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #33
Double Negative
Canon DSLR Refugee
 
Double Negative's Avatar
 
Double Negative is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,009
$30k is still cheaper than a $50k Hassy, at least.
__________________
Leica M8, M9 & Zeiss Ikon; CV 1,2/35 Nokton, 3,5/28, 2,5/35 and 2,5/50 Color Skopars, Leica 2,8/90 Elmarit-M
Zeiss ZM 4/18 Distagon, 2,8/25 Biogon, 2/35 Biogon, 1,5/50 Sonnar and 2/50 Planar
Mamiya 7II; N50mm f/4.5L, N65mm f/4L, N80mm f/4L and N150mm f/4.5L
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #34
Ray Nalley
-
 
Ray Nalley is offline
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 305
You got to give it to Leica, this is a Hail Mary pass, putting all of their R&D in the MF market. It'll be interesting to see if that market responds.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #35
urban_alchemist
Registered User
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
urban_alchemist is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel/London, UK
Posts: 605
I'm a bit disappointed by this truth-be told. When I first heard about the S2, I was hoping for something more inline with the original S1. Not a tethered studio camera, but a dSLR that could use a collection of first and third-party lenses, (new) S-mount, R, M, Canon, Nikon all using adapters. With a 'bigger than 35mm' sensor, software could have cropped the sensor for optimisation with any given lense, with the AF disabled for all but the S-mount lenses.

As it is, it looks like a lovely camera, but too close to the existing Hasselblads, Leafs etc...
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #36
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 44
Posts: 11,525
Quote:
Originally Posted by Double Negative View Post
$30k is still cheaper than a $50k Hassy, at least.
$30k is just a guess and Leica has never been known for not out charging their competition for their products.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

1955 DS M3 w/Elmar 50/2.8, Nikkor 50/2 or Canon 50/1.5, 1962 M2 w/35mm Summaron, 1966 SS M3 w/50mm Summilux, 1968 M4 w/50mm rigid Summicron and CV 35 Ultron, Bessa R4a w/CV 21/4 Color Skopar, CV 28/2 Ultron and CV 35/2.5 PII Color Skopar

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #37
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 5,970
http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-...-post-all.html

You need patience - it seems to be a bit busy over there.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #38
sunsworth
Registered User
 
sunsworth is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 216
Quote:
Originally Posted by photomoof View Post
I can almost guarantee that is is NOT autofocus.
Read the text
__________________
Steve Unsworth

www.steveunsworth.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #39
dcsang
Crazy Canuck Kid
 
dcsang's Avatar
 
dcsang is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 3,429
hmm..

Any idea if this will ever make it to production? I only see the word "Prototype" in the text posted by PizzaHut88

Curious,
Dave
__________________
I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constatine Manos

Regarding the pricing of my work: "You are worth MORE than a pair of shoes" - Mariann Szucs

ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill

My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #40
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 5,970
The "professional photographer" article...


http://www.flickr.com/photos/2978242...15170/sizes/l/
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #41
dcsang
Crazy Canuck Kid
 
dcsang's Avatar
 
dcsang is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto Canada
Age: 44
Posts: 3,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
The "professional photographer" article...


http://www.flickr.com/photos/2978242...15170/sizes/l/
Ya.. and I quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professional Photographer
From Pros experience with Leica's prototype S2. . . . .
I don't see anyone stating when this would be in production or available that's all - right now it's a prototype - it's a great announcement but there's no production set up is there? (or is there??) - I'm looking at this akin to Pentax's initial DSLR announcement a number of years ago and it took them quite a while to get the final product to the retail chain level.

Dave
__________________
I have an idea what I'm looking for but it only becomes real once I see it - Constatine Manos

Regarding the pricing of my work: "You are worth MORE than a pair of shoes" - Mariann Szucs

ITS THE MAGIC I SEE IN THE Light, Texture, & Tone
that Intoxicates Me - Helen Hill

My Flickr - it's where I post my RF and P&S shtuff
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #42
LeicaTom
Watch that step!
 
LeicaTom's Avatar
 
LeicaTom is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Winter Haven Florida
Age: 46
Posts: 1,917
Looks like a bad dream.......

I`ll keep shooting with my M6

Tom
__________________
My cameras still do what they were bulit to do best....
take pictures
1943"Kugellager" Leica IIIC K Grey Dark Red Shutter K *civilian issue*
1945 "Kugellager" Leica IIIC K Grey *US Army Issue*
(3)1945 Chrome "Stepper" Leica IIIC K's US Army issues w/ "Kugellager" shutters
1951 Leica IIFBD w/f3.5/50 Elmar
1955 Canon IIF2 w/ f1.8/50 & Rapidwinder
1957 Tower 35 w/f2/50 Nikkor HC
1987 "Wetzlar" Leica M6 w/1992 Rigid Summicron f2/50mm
2006 Leica M8 w/Canon f1.2/50 & f1.5/35 lenses

Last edited by LeicaTom : 09-22-2008 at 09:34.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #43
JonasYip
Registered User
 
JonasYip's Avatar
 
JonasYip is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 375
I like it.
__________________
-
-
The album is finally officially released! More info at perfectnines.com

Jonas Yip

www.jonasyip.com
The Perfect Nines

12-15-21-28-28-35-40-50-50-50-75-90
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #44
cmogi10
Bodhisattva
 
cmogi10's Avatar
 
cmogi10 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,864
It looksbadass as hell...cool. Very cool.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #45
historicist
Registered User
 
historicist is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: lost
Posts: 530
Quote:
Cool, and they named it after a venerable Nikon rangefinder camera
So maybe this is where the Nikon medium format digital RF rumours came from
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #46
FifthLeaf
amateur
 
FifthLeaf is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Budapest
Posts: 60
The sensor is significantly smaller than MF so I doubt it can compete with those digital MF Hasselblads. If you read the article, you'll see that it's meant to compete for high-end "field" situations where you can't lug around the MF gear, laptop, etc. And that niche is usually filled in by the top of the line Canons and Nikons.

Leica can't muscle in on the big boys' main turf, so they're going after a target that's mostly Canon and Nikon for lack of a better alternative.

Last edited by FifthLeaf : 09-22-2008 at 09:48.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #47
Petroleum V. Nasby
-
 
Petroleum V. Nasby is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 142
Disaster.

In reality, just WHO is going to buy this?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #48
urban_alchemist
Registered User
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
urban_alchemist is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tel-Aviv, Israel/London, UK
Posts: 605
Quote:
Originally Posted by FifthLeaf View Post
Leica can't compete with the big boys so it's trying to find its own niche.
As we say here in Israel: kol hakavod

Rough translation: 'good job'
__________________
Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #49
johnastovall
Light Hunter - RIP 2010
 
johnastovall's Avatar
 
johnastovall is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Dublin, Texas, U.S.A.
Age: 65
Posts: 613
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avotius View Post
that sure is one ugly camera
The way a camera body looks doesn't matter it's the images it produces. Have you ever seen Josef Sudek's camera?
__________________
"The market wants a Leica to be a Leica: the inheritor of tradition, the subject of lore, and indisputably a mark of status to own."
Mike Johnston
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-22-2008   #50
NIKON KIU
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
 
NIKON KIU's Avatar
 
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
Leica has a press conference set for 10:00 AM on Wednesday:
http://photokina.en.koelnmesse.info/...tes_bydate.pdf

I guess we'll be sure by then...

Who said Photokina will be boring??

Kiu
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:32.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.