Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

C41 processing - pro lab or local minilab
Old 09-12-2008   #1
sojournerphoto
Registered User
 
sojournerphoto is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,557
C41 processing - pro lab or local minilab

Given that I expect to scan my own film for printing, is there any advantage to sending C41 film to a pro lab compared to the local minilab. Any prints are used primarily as a set of big contacts.

Thanks

Mike
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #2
Michael I.
Registered User
 
Michael I.'s Avatar
 
Michael I. is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Israel
Age: 31
Posts: 1,007
yes there is.
__________________
My Gallery

My Blog\Photoblog
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #3
ClaremontPhoto
Jon Claremont
 
ClaremontPhoto's Avatar
 
ClaremontPhoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alentejo
Posts: 5,340
There are minilabs and there are minilabs.

I take my C41 to a local family place that has a thriving wedding and studio business and use their minilab for their own work.

On the other hand a minimum wage school leaver without any training or photographic background in a supermarket may not be quite as good.
__________________
.

R.I.P. 2009

Jon


ClaremontPhoto


Box of Chocolates
A Gray Area
Panoramic
Friends & Neighbors



"I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me." Noel Coward

Last edited by ClaremontPhoto : 09-12-2008 at 04:11.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #4
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,183
It does depend on the lab. My pro lab has an attached minilab, I have them do my E6 and get the films run, scanned and mounted for much less, with pretty darn equal quality processing and scans plenty good for what I use them for. I shoot E6 (and Kodachrome) now just for snapshots, and email images to family and friends. Dwayne's scans my K64 when they run it, but the K64 process/scan/mount is more than the minilab charges for E6/scan/mount.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #5
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,440
If someone offers a water wash (instead of stabilization) that's good, but even pro labs often stabilize.

Otherwise, it's down to the lab. You may find the following of interest, based as it is on decades of trying to find decent labs in different places.

http://www.rogerandfrances.com/photo...20a%20lab.html

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #6
kshapero
My new hat
 
kshapero's Avatar
 
kshapero is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: 3 miles from the Everglades
Age: 63
Posts: 8,115
For C41, I have not found anyone who can beat the quality of Costco, at least for scans. About $4 for negs and a CD.
__________________
Akiva S.

Down to a cherished Leica M3 and lots of film based Nikon's.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/kshapero/

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #7
kipkeston
Registered User
 
kipkeston's Avatar
 
kipkeston is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 576
It seems like he's saying he only wants processing? He scans at home. Or did I missunderstand.
__________________
kipkeston.com
flickr
utensi
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #8
sojournerphoto
Registered User
 
sojournerphoto is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,557
Yes, I scan at home on an LS5000, so the lower res scans that most labs provide are surplus to requirements - as is the large collection of CDs that develops.

My concerns are really whether there is a quality difference between labs resulting from equipment maintenance and useage skill as well as the archival properties of the negs.

Roger, thanks for the link. I like your site. I'm guessing that a water wash increases archival storage properties in cmparison to a stabiliser bath?

Thanks
Mike
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #9
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by sojournerphoto View Post

Roger, thanks for the link. I like your site. I'm guessing that a water wash increases archival storage properties in cmparison to a stabiliser bath?

Thanks
Mike
Dear Mike,

You're welcome. Thanks for the kind words. Yes, that's the advantage of water wash.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #10
MichaelW
Registered User
 
MichaelW is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 156
A pro lab should be better as I would expect them to use a processing machine that is less likely to damage your film, e.g. dip & dunk. Most mini labs use roller transport & there is more chance of film scratching. Also pro machines make it easier to push or pull if you require that.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #11
John Rountree
Nothing is what I want
 
John Rountree is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Black Mountain, NC
Posts: 342
All good answers. Go with the pro lab, unless you find a mini-lab that is near the same quality. After all, how much is a good negative worth to you? Film is always the cheapest part of the equation. If it's not on the film, you don't have anything. In this case I am not talking about the shooting. So what, if you spend more on processing at pro lab? If you get that negative that is just right, and gives you the print you want, isn't the extra money worth it? Sure, the mini lab MAY have done a similar job, but just as in shooting, it is the pro lab's responsibility (and reputation) to do the the job right EVERY time. For the few cents more it costs, I really think you will get your money's worth from the pro lab.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-12-2008   #12
Roger Hicks
Registered User
 
Roger Hicks is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Aquitaine
Posts: 18,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Rountree View Post
For the few cents more it costs, I really think you will get your money's worth from the pro lab.
Dear John,

It's not just the 'few cents' (more like 2x - 3x the cost). It's also the proximity of the lab. I can find several good minilabs in a 20 mile radius -- including one pro photographer who also does processing.

I don't recall the last dedicated pro lab I used that did dip-and-dunk C-41; most have been continuous (roller-transport) for 10 years or more.

Bear in mind that I am in fact talking from a professional viewpoint, i.e. taking pics to earn money.

Cheers,

R.
__________________
Now even more free photography information on www.rogerandfrances.com
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 22:46.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.