Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Optics and Lenses -

Optics and Lenses - This forum is aimed towards the TECHNICAL side of photographic OPTICS and LENSES. There will be some overlap by camera/manufacturer, but this forum is for the heavy duty tech discussions. This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum. This is the forum to discuss optics or lenses in general, to learn about the tech behind the lenses and images. IF you have a question about a specific lens, post it in the forum about that type of camera, NOT HERE.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Fast 35: canon 1.5 or Nokton 1.4?
Old 09-05-2008   #1
sanmich
The man who shot film
 
sanmich's Avatar
 
sanmich is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,773
Fast 35: canon 1.5 or Nokton 1.4?

Have anyone here compared the properties of these two lenses?

I have the canon and like its handling. It also seems quite sharp (nothing scientifical here). The minimal foocus distance is too long for my taste though.

Thanks
__________________
Michael

Gloire a qui n'ayant pas d'ideal sacro-saint se borne a ne pas trop emmerder ses voisins (Brassens)


GAS rehab
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-05-2008   #2
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
I just got the Canon 35mm/1.5, so I cannot give my detailed opinion yet. I have used it before, and I liked it.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-05-2008   #3
Bill58
Native Texan
 
Bill58's Avatar
 
Bill58 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: So. Korea
Posts: 3,085
Hopefully, I'm not breaking the warning of "This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum", but I would get a superb 35/2 Canon and use super-fast film to get the same results. The 35/1.5 Canon is pretty rare and expensive.
__________________
Too many cameras-too little time. [b]


My images of a strange land-So. Korea:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/wrs111445/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-05-2008   #4
raid
Dad Photographer
 
raid's Avatar
 
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill58 View Post
Hopefully, I'm not breaking the warning of "This is NOT the place to discuss a specific lens or lens line, do that in the appropriate forum", but I would get a superb 35/2 Canon and use super-fast film to get the same results. The 35/1.5 Canon is pretty rare and expensive.
Bill,

It is not much more expensive than a clean 35/2.
__________________
- Raid

________________
Top 12 Images;

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/rffg...n.php?cid=7007
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-11-2008   #5
Sonnar2
Registered User
 
Sonnar2's Avatar
 
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 1,416
Try to find one of the same price. The 35/1.5 is much rarer.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 23:07.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.