Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film

Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film Discuss Image processing -- traditional darkoom or digital lightroom here. Notice there are subcategories to narrow down subject matter. .

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Ilford Delta films in Diafine?
Old 06-18-2008   #1
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
 
Ronald_H's Avatar
 
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 1,590
Ilford Delta films in Diafine?

Ok, here's my situation:

I started with Diafine and Tri-X because that combo worked great for my high contrast concert shooting. In fact Diafine and Tri-X works well in whatever situation you might want to throw at it. HP5+ also does very well in it.

A slower 'old' film like Ilford FP4 works nicely, but I don't really think I get the most out of it with Diafine.

And here's where the Delta film comes in: I got some for my birthday, but they are not listed on the Diafine box! I know that Kodak TMax 100 works in Diafine, but how will the Ilford films do and how would I rate them?

I just found out that my local photo store still stocks ID-11 and D76, so I might want to try that route.
__________________
"The only substitute for Tri-X is more Tri-X"

My Flickr

My regular website: www.lookupinwonder.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-2008   #2
Matt(1pt4)
Registered User
 
Matt(1pt4) is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 175
You can read about my experiences with Delta 100, 400 & 3200 in Diafine here:

http://www.1point4photography.com/blog/diafine-days/

Unlike most films, Delta 100 actually loses some film speed in Diafine.
__________________
www.1pt4.com

  Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-2008   #3
Ronald_H
Don't call me Ron
 
Ronald_H's Avatar
 
Ronald_H is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Helmond, The Netherlands
Age: 42
Posts: 1,590
Thank you Matt. How did you rate the Delta 400? I see you rated the 100 at 50! That's quite different from the 160 I used for Tmax 100 (and even that I consider too low).

It's probably all a case of YMMV, but having taken the first steps with home development recently, I probably should just try it and see what happens. I'm pretty sure the negs will come out usable.
__________________
"The only substitute for Tri-X is more Tri-X"

My Flickr

My regular website: www.lookupinwonder.nl
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-2008   #4
titrisol
Bottom Feeder
 
titrisol's Avatar
 
titrisol is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rotterdam / Quito
Age: 42
Posts: 1,305
Also D3200 gives a 1000 speed in Diafine
__________________
When I think back of all the crappy pictures I've taken, it's a wonder I can see at all......
APX It gives us the nicer grays/It gives the cleanes whites/Makes you think all the world’s a sunny day, oh yeah/I got a nikon camera/I love to take a photograph
MAMA DON'T TAKE MY APX AWAY........
Sorry Paul Simon


My gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-2008   #5
sockeyed
Registered User
 
sockeyed's Avatar
 
sockeyed is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 42
Posts: 919
I'm not a fan of Diafine. From my experience, you lose a lot in terms of tonality and shadow detail for the benefits of higher speeds, and if you don't even get higher speeds with the Delta films, it seems to not make sense. It would seem a waste of good film to use it for Delta. I would highly recommend D-76 or ID-11. I've also had good success with Delta 400 + XTOL:

__________________
Likes: rangefinders, film, pie, Tanqueray & tonic



Sockeyed Photo

Flickr

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-18-2008   #6
Matt(1pt4)
Registered User
 
Matt(1pt4) is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 175
I rated Delta 400 @ 400. That's what my Diafine box recommends. Not sure why I rated the 100 at 50 since the box says 80. I might have changed my mind about how I was planning on developing it.

'From my experience, you lose a lot in terms of tonality and shadow detail for the benefits of higher speeds, and if you don't even get higher speeds with the Delta films, it seems to not make sense. It would seem a waste of good film to use it for Delta.'

With TriX and HP5, you get the speed boost, but you lose should some shadow detail. With Delta, you get no speed boost, but shadow detail does not seem to suffer. The negs are fairly dense. The results of my limited trial were inconclusive at the time, but I think now I know enough about scanning that I could get good tonality out of Delta 400 in Diafine.

It may not be my first choice for developers but in terms of shelf life, flexibility and economy, Diafine scores high.
__________________
www.1pt4.com

  Reply With Quote

Old 08-11-2008   #7
stephaneb
Registered User
 
stephaneb is offline
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 47
Diafine and Delta do not match very well. I find HC-110 a better match.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:19.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.