Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Philosophy of Photography

Philosophy of Photography Taking pics is one thing, but understanding why we take them, what they mean, what they are best used for, how they effect our reality -- all of these and more are important issues of the Philosophy of Photography. One of the best authors on the subject is Susan Sontag in her book "On Photography."

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

About TRADITIONAL
Old 06-07-2008   #1
dee
Registered User
 
dee's Avatar
 
dee is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: M25 south UK
Posts: 1,356
About TRADITIONAL

I bought an M 8 and Digilux 3 because my ASdee can't cope with a modern DSLR interface .. not to mention kinda not seeing them as ''camera ''

OK , an extreme situation of mind blindness , but I can't really call the shutter dial / aperture ring mode '' traditional '' , because , not withstanding it's long survival , my 30 odd year old daughter , and , I suspect , most new photographers would consider a Nikon D 300 etc , or my Pentax K 10 D , of compact digital camera to be '' traditional '' ...

Makes me wonder how rapidly it's all changing !

dee
__________________
Leica M 8 . Leica Dig 3 and L 1 . Leica II / Leica IIIc . Mint 1952 Kiev 2 etc Taking snapshots and keeping ASdee contained .
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #2
Livesteamer
Registered User
 
Livesteamer is offline
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Winston Salem North Carolina
Posts: 882
Maybe it's about simplicity. Yesterday I shot two rolls of a friends graduating daughter in her gown and cap. I was using an old M3 with it's five basic controls and my old incident light meter. Friend had a new digital camera with a myriad of controls, buttons and menus along with a thick instruction manual which she was struggling to figure out. I wonder which is simpler, to learn f stops and handheld metering once or to learn an inch thick instruction manual every two years with your new digital camera?.
Joe
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #3
craygc
Registered User
 
craygc's Avatar
 
craygc is offline
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Singapore
Age: 53
Posts: 856
Twas my wife's birthday yesterday (she's not quite 30) and amongst other things I got her a Canon G9 (closest Ive ever been to owning a digicam of any kind). She has no trouble going through the manual and working things out. As for me, within 5 minutes the damn thing was driving me crazy ...way toooo many controls and parameters for a camera. I work in technology so its not that I cant comprehend it, and I dont mind putting in the time with scanning and post processing, but I just cant get interested in the camera being such a complicated device.
__________________
Craig Cooper
Singapore
flickr

Leica M's + Mamiya 7II
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #4
ChrisN
Striving
 
ChrisN's Avatar
 
ChrisN is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Canberra
Posts: 4,272
Traditional is simply whatever you grew up with. I can easily cope with the "complexities" of a dSLR, but I grew up (photographically speaking) with my father's Voigtlander rangefinder, and my OM10, and I still find these very comforting to use.
__________________
Chris


"The mission of photography is to explain man to man and each to himself. And that is the most complicated thing on earth."
Edward Steichen

RFF Gallery

Flickr

I hardly know her

My Top 10
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #5
Gumby
Registered User
 
Gumby is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,533
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisN View Post
Traditional is simply whatever you grew up with.
Sometimes... and other times it is simply whatever your father grew up with. "Traditional" is a very context-sensitive term and, often, a very poor term for discriminating differences between things or, um, traditions.

p.s. (to OP)... out of curiousity, what is "ASdee"?
__________________
With kind regards, ed.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #6
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,302
I have yet to spring for a DSLR. I have owned two P&S digitals, with some manual control. I have actually taken more shots with them since I got them than all my film cameras put together. Especially snap shots of my grandson. It is fun to do so. He is now 4 years old and likes to see the photos of himself as soon as I take them.

However, I still feel better using film cameras. I am not sure why. Probably is something to do with tradition or some such. Especially my folders. But I haven't given up on my FX 103's nor my Fujicas either. But I don't really feel they are "traditional" since Yashica and Fujica got me back into photography nearly 35 years ago, and I have used them ever since. Nor have I made any commitment to digital other than as a snap shot camera.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #7
MickH
Registered User
 
MickH is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 991
The great Kenneth Williams had a different interpretation of "Traditional" altogether.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #8
rpsawin
RF Enthusiast
 
rpsawin's Avatar
 
rpsawin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by craygc View Post
Twas my wife's birthday yesterday (she's not quite 30) and amongst other things I got her a Canon G9 (closest Ive ever been to owning a digicam of any kind). She has no trouble going through the manual and working things out. As for me, within 5 minutes the damn thing was driving me crazy ...way toooo many controls and parameters for a camera. I work in technology so its not that I cant comprehend it, and I dont mind putting in the time with scanning and post processing, but I just cant get interested in the camera being such a complicated device.
Yep. The thing I love about my M2 & MP is they have no modes...just moods.

I have a G9 I keep in my gear bag and I finally gave up fighting with it and use in auto mode as a p&s. I think if the G9, or any dslr, were my only platform I would eventually committ the menus to memory. It's a style issue and I agree with yours.

Best regards,

Bob

ps...I shoot with a M7II as well....why would you ever give that up?
__________________
Best regards,

Bob
CEO-CFO-EIEIO, Ret.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #9
dee
Registered User
 
dee's Avatar
 
dee is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: M25 south UK
Posts: 1,356
My G2 tends to be auto only , 'cos it's so complicated , but it's fine as point and shoot .
[ It also creates sensible file sizes , something which seems to have been lost along the way ! ]
emma the M 8 is dream in that I can do just what I have ever done - take an average reading , set manual , and no fear of light / dark subjects having vastly fdifferreing exposures .
Ditto the Dig 3 .
On my Pentax K 10 D it's just not ''right '' !
Thanks for all your comments .

Regards

dee
__________________
Leica M 8 . Leica Dig 3 and L 1 . Leica II / Leica IIIc . Mint 1952 Kiev 2 etc Taking snapshots and keeping ASdee contained .
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #10
hlockwood
Registered User
 
hlockwood is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Boston metro area
Posts: 752
Quote:
Originally Posted by craygc View Post
Twas my wife's birthday yesterday (she's not quite 30) and amongst other things I got her a Canon G9 (closest Ive ever been to owning a digicam of any kind). She has no trouble going through the manual and working things out. As for me, within 5 minutes the damn thing was driving me crazy ...way toooo many controls and parameters for a camera. I work in technology so its not that I cant comprehend it, and I dont mind putting in the time with scanning and post processing, but I just cant get interested in the camera being such a complicated device.
That's because the G9 (I have one) is not a camera; it's a computer that happens to take pictures.

Harry
__________________
Harry Lockwood
www.pbase.com/hlockwood

Leica M7/0.85, Hexar RF, M9-P and a bunch of lenses.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-07-2008   #11
Pablito
coco frío
 
Pablito's Avatar
 
Pablito is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Salsipuedes
Posts: 2,987
It is what you make it. Any dslr can be simple as a Leica m6, OM1 or FM. Just put it on manual exposure, centerweighted metering and take pictures. Very reliable and predictable way of working.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2008   #12
georgef
Registered User
 
georgef is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 340
you know,....you dont HAVE to use all the parameters in the camera!
I don't think I have used much of any other mode than aperture priority on my cameras, ever, even though my TOPCON film RF had three controls and my CANON 1Ds has 1,000!
Still, its easier and cheaper for camera manufacturers to put controls in the software than hardware, so things like aperture rings will eventually go the hidden route.
Then my son, now 6, will ask me why-oh-why do I bother with squinting and focusing instead of the AF that already comes with the camera! Never mind handheld light meters he he he!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2008   #13
feenej
Registered User
 
feenej is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 666
I went to take a picture in a darkly lit bar with my pal's digicam. Turn the flash off? Forget it. Not without the manual. Select a certain shutter speed? Hopeless. One time my friend handed me his new dSLR because we were gonna take a group shot and he could not figure out how to use the self timer. Took me three minutes of staring at the thing to figure it out.

I took a pass on the jumbo plastic digicams, tho I do think that they are great cameras. I like the plastic on my Bessa. Lightweight.

Last edited by feenej : 06-11-2008 at 07:43.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2008   #14
Spider67
Registered User
 
Spider67's Avatar
 
Spider67 is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Vienna
Posts: 1,081
"Traditional " once a friend here in Austria said to me "so you do traditional photography"
And in an instant I saw myself as an old withered mountaineer with lederhosen who made the filmemulsion himself ina big cauldron, scooping it up with a wooden spoon to check if it turned out right and expalining in antiquated vernacular the rituals of traditional photgraphy ("always look at the mountains first that ´s were the sun comes out and sets", "I´ll teach you the arcane Rule of the sunny 16!" ...etc.)
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-11-2008   #15
Argenticien
Dave
 
Argenticien is offline
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC, USA
Posts: 303
Quote:
Originally Posted by georgef View Post
you know,....you dont HAVE to use all the parameters in the camera!
Well, agreed on that, but, there's still the problem of wanting to use the traditional features that aren't there but should be. Last weekend at an arboretum, a stranger handed me her digital P&S and asked if I might take a picture of her and her husband. I immediately began raising the camera to my eye to look through the RF/VF, and had it up to nose height before realizing there was not one; it was one of those models where you can compose only using the LCD monitor on the back. I sheepishly apologized as they giggled and I extended the camera to arm's length to shoot. Mind you this was made sillier given that I'm 37 and they appeared to be 55-60, but I was having the old-fogey moment!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2008   #16
photophorous
Registered User
 
photophorous's Avatar
 
photophorous is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 385
I started using my mom's "old manual" camera in the mid-90's, when I was about 18. Still use it. Love the thing. I always thought of it as old school and traditional, but one day I noticed it had an "auto" setting. Turns out I love simple electronic SLRs from the 70s and 80s...not exactly all manual and traditional. I guess you consider what your parents used to be traditional. Oh well. I still prefer it over a DSLR. I think that's why I like my Bessa R2A so much. It functions pretty much the same way.

Paul
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2008   #17
Jonni
-
 
Jonni is offline
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlockwood View Post
That's because the G9 (I have one) is not a camera; it's a computer that happens to take pictures.

Harry
Isn't that so for any digital camera?
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2008   #18
georgef
Registered User
 
georgef is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonni View Post
Isn't that so for any digital camera?
EPSON RD1. take a look and fall in love
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:38.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.