Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Another attempt at Infrared on the M8
Old 04-03-2008   #1
Nick De Marco
Registered User
 
Nick De Marco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
Another attempt at Infrared on the M8

I hope this one is a bit better than the last attempt



Using 18mm Zeiss lens and BW IR filter
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-04-2008   #2
DaveB
Registered User
 
DaveB's Avatar
 
DaveB is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Hampster
Posts: 90
It's a real thrill to have an unmodified digital camera that can shoot IR hand held.

When combined with these easy to focus wide angle lenses it's particulary convenient.

I enjoy shooting IR when the sun is high, the shadows harsh, and conditions are otherwise not optimal for photography. It gives me something to do while waiting for the golden hour.
__________________
Dave is not accepting criticism at this time.

He will resume full accountability 9:00 PM EDT Saturday.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2008   #3
ernesto
Registered User
 
ernesto's Avatar
 
ernesto is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 206
How do you switch the camera to infrared?
Do you really need the filter?
(trying to understand Infrared Digital)

Ernesto
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2008   #4
Nick De Marco
Registered User
 
Nick De Marco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
Ernesto, with the M8 you don't need to switch to anything (although you might want to take in B&W so you can preview but it is not necessary).
Yes you need a filter, and preferably a proper IR one that costs more than 50 pounds for a decent result
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2008   #5
ernesto
Registered User
 
ernesto's Avatar
 
ernesto is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 206
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick De Marco View Post
Ernesto, with the M8 you don't need to switch to anything (although you might want to take in B&W so you can preview but it is not necessary).
Yes you need a filter, and preferably a proper IR one that costs more than 50 pounds for a decent result

Nick, Does this means that the M8 is sees infrared light anytime?
Even when you take normal pitures?

Ernesto
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2008   #6
Nick De Marco
Registered User
 
Nick De Marco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
Someone with better technical know;edge than m should be able to explain, but my understanding is that the M8 has very high IR sensitivity when taking 'normal pictures'. This is one of the reasons you sometimes have to put a UV/IR filter on the lens so that black does not become pure (I believe). The advantage is the camera is ideal for pure IR photography by adding a pure IR filter
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-20-2008   #7
hr1
Registered User
 
hr1 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 4
I'd love to know how to take infra red images - I have B+W uv/ir filters - are these what you're referring to?
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #8
Nick De Marco
Registered User
 
Nick De Marco is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 662
You need a dedicated 'true' IR filter. Here is an article about it

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/re...infrared.shtml
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #9
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,201
These are true IR images in B&W , using a 092 filter, which actually lets a miniscule amount of visible light through as well in the low end of the spectrum. For total blocking of visible light you need a 093 filter.








And thid is how one uses that rest of visible light, to make colour IR images:




__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography

Last edited by jaapv : 04-21-2008 at 05:55.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #10
spyder2000
Dim Bulb
 
spyder2000's Avatar
 
spyder2000 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 213
Truth is many cameras are sensitive in the IR region. To see the IR effect, you need to add an 87C filter to the lens. This removes the visible spectrum and passes IR.

One way to check your camera for IR is to point your tv remote control at the camera, and while viewing the image on the chimp screen, press the buttons on the tv remote. You'll see the remote's transmitter flash. This doesn't guarantee good photographic results but it does indicate you have a camera that is sensitive in the IR spectrum and is not filetered internally.

I have a Canon G2. It makes great IR images. I also have a Kodak Easy Share. Results there are spotty at best. I guess this paragraph makes me OT.
__________________
-- Mark
Standard, M2, M3, IIS2, IIIa, Signet 35, IIIC, Ia ...
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #11
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,201
I just had a look at the Reichmann article. There is one error in there. He says "there is no IR focus mark, so I had to stop down to f 11" That is nonsense. The focus mark is identical, on non-apo lenses, with the 5.6 DOF mark. Plus, IR is generally used for landscape photography. What harm does focus bracketing do? I usuall shoot at 5.6 or 4.0 and run through a progressive focus series.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography

Last edited by jaapv : 04-21-2008 at 07:52.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #12
wstotler
Registered User
 
wstotler is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv View Post
I usuall shooty at 5.6 or 4.0 and run through a progressive focus series.
Personally, I've been shooting at f/2. I, too, have read the "stop down to f/11 or f/16" regarding IR photography--not just in the Luminous Landscape article--but I haven't been heeding that. Nailing focus is difficult so I have been focus bracketing, also. Five shots, focus bracketed, usually yields one good one. (When I'm shooting closer than infinity.) I'm getting better, though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #13
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by ernesto View Post
Nick, Does this means that the M8 is sees infrared light anytime?
Even when you take normal pitures?

Ernesto
Yes, that is exactly what all the magenta hoohah was about.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-21-2008   #14
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
The older Summicrons (collapsible, type I Rigid) are extremely well corrected for color, and the IR index is within the F2.8 DOF marks.

I've used inexpensive Kodak Wratten Filters for IR work before. We're talking $2 at camera shows for an 87c or 88a.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-24-2008   #15
DaveB
Registered User
 
DaveB's Avatar
 
DaveB is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: New Hampster
Posts: 90
I like the 15mm CV for IR because it makes focusing almost a non-issue.

__________________
Dave is not accepting criticism at this time.

He will resume full accountability 9:00 PM EDT Saturday.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.