 |
50mm - nokton 1.5 or canon 1.4? |
 |
03-29-2008
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 715
|
50mm - nokton 1.5 or canon 1.4?
I know there's a lot of 50mm talk these days, but I was wondering if people have compared these two lenses? I love how smooth my 35 1.2 is and I'm looking for something in a 50mm that's close to that. I have a J-8 (too contrasty) and a j-3 (which is ok). I wish I could stretch for a lux or even the sonnar, but that can't happen right now. I haven't seen many samples of the canon, and the stuff I've seen from the nokton reminds me of the ultron - a pretty nice modern lens, but nothing super special in the character dept. Thoughts?
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#2
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Have you seen images taken with a Canon 50/1.5? People swear by it. The Sonnar look differs from what you would get with the [excellent] Canon 50/1.4. I was fortunate enough to compare about 20 50mm lenses, and it just showed me that what I already had was sufficient for the type of photos that I am taking. The canon 50/1.2 after being adjusted by DAG is now a superb lens. It also could be a nice complement to your 35mm/1.2 if you need/want a super fast set of lenses. If the 35/1.2 is "your fast lens", then maybe a 40mm/2.8 Rollei may do the job for superior quality performance.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#3
|
|
back to basics
laptoprob is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the original Haarlem
Age: 46
Posts: 1,559
|
Look at my signature! There is nothing like a Sonnar!
__________________
groeten, Rob.
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams
IR and concert pics
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 715
|
I'm trying to stick around $300 or so for this purchase.
Thanks Raid for the info. What did you think about the canon 1.4? I mention this one because I may have the chance for one locally....
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 4,653
|
Hi Morgan -- I was just checking in at RFF and saw your thread. The Canon 50/1.4 is reputed to be an excellent lens, quite similar in signature to the Nokton 50/1.5. You might find the following thread useful in answering your question:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...ad.php?t=52871
__________________
Steve
M2, M4-2, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
XD-11, X700, and assorted MD Rokkor lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS
My Flickr
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#6
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan
I'm trying to stick around $300 or so for this purchase.
Thanks Raid for the info. What did you think about the canon 1.4? I mention this one because I may have the chance for one locally....
|
Morgan,
As with all vintage lenses, examples will differ from lens to lens with respect to "perfection". The Canon 50/1.4 that I tested was not up to par, which exited many Canon 50/1.4 owners who immediately made itclear that I had a bad example in my test. It seems that edge to edge sharpness is better for the Canon 50/1.4 than for the Canon 50/1.5,but some people prefer the Sonnar look where the center is tack sharp and the edges less sharp.
Try to buy the Canon 50/1.4 and test it quickly wide open and at different distances. See if you are allowed a one day testing.
Brain Sweeney or DAG could then reshimm the lens if needed.
|
|
|
|
 |
03-29-2008
|
#7
|
|
Think Different
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 1,905
|
It depends what you mean by character. Raid and Brian Sweeney have both run extensive tests of several different 50mm lenses. Take a look in the "optics and lenses" category and locate these threads. Plenty of photos here that may help you with your decision.
Jim B.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 715
|
Thanks Steve. That's a good thread. Raid - I found your samples from the 50mm shoot off in that thread as well. It made me take out my J-3 again to give it a whirl. It's been a while since I've shot with it. I usually shoot with the 35, but I've been trying to mix it up...
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#9
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
This thread caused GAS; I just ordered a Canon 50mm/1.4 online!
This is all your fault, Morgan!
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 4,653
|
LOL!!! Seems to be a bit of GAS going around    , and I might have succumbed to a Canon 50/1.4 too if I didn't already have a Nokton 50!
Enjoy the lenses, guys, and post pics w/ them!
__________________
Steve
M2, M4-2, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
XD-11, X700, and assorted MD Rokkor lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS
My Flickr
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#11
|
|
Think Different
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 1,905
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by raid
This thread caused GAS; I just ordered a Canon 50mm/1.4 online!
|
You'll like the Canon 50/1.4. Excellent sharpness with real nice smooth out-of-focus highlights. That, and my new Nikkor 50/2.0, are now my most used 50s'.
Jim B.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
03-29-2008
|
#12
|
|
Happy Snapper
kully is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 2,554
|
Hallo Morgan, I have the CV35/1.2, CV50/1.5 and Canon 50/1.4. For me, the 35 and 50 Noktons (not the 35/1.4 Nokteen) look very much alike. I've been looking through 18 rolls worth of slides taken last Autumn with Velvia 50/Provia 400F - colour, and the smoothness you mention seem the same to me, to such an extent that I couldn't tell which one a slide was taken with without having a think back.
I havn't used the Canon 50/1.4 enough to have an opinion on the intricate differences compared to the Nokton, but I have been suprised by it's lovely colours / contrast and lack of flare, I it expected to have a much more olden days character (/flaws). I bought this for my IIIa thinking it's smaller size would be better - but no, it's not all that smaller than the Nokton when you put a 48>>49mm stepup and filter on it. I also find myself preferring the short-throw focus of the 50 Nokton compared to the longer Canon throw.
So, the Canon isn't different enough from the Nokton, and is now for sale and I've got a 50/1.5 on the way to replace it.
If you want the look of your 35/1.2 in 50mm I would go for the 50mm Nokton, remember that these share the same 52mm filter size and you can exchange hoods too.
|
|
|
|
 |
03-29-2008
|
#13
|
|
Happy Snapper
kully is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 2,554
|
Did I hear "GAS attack"? Look out for a gorgeous as new Canon 50/1.4 with caps and 48>>49mm stepup in the classifieds next week.
Although your GAS is giving me GHS (Gear Hoarding Syndrome), I'm interested to hear why some hypothetical person might have a 50 Nokton _and_ the Canon 
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Bingley is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 4,653
|
Hi Kully -- Congrats on getting the Canon 50/1.5! I predict you will love this lens -- it is v. different than the Nokton, particularly wide open. Nice to have BOTH of these lenses: old school Sonnar design v. new school sharp edge to edge wide open. Hypothetically speaking, that is.... 
__________________
Steve
M2, M4-2, IIIc, IVSB2, & T, and assorted LTM & M lenses
XD-11, X700, and assorted MD Rokkor lenses, Rolleicord III, Rolleiflex Automat MX-EVS
My Flickr
My Gallery
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#15
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan
Thanks Steve. That's a good thread. Raid - I found your samples from the 50mm shoot off in that thread as well. It made me take out my J-3 again to give it a whirl. It's been a while since I've shot with it. I usually shoot with the 35, but I've been trying to mix it up...
|
Morgan,
I also have taken out the J-3 for more photo adventures than I have been doing in the past. My J-3 was "put together" by Brian Sweeney, and it is very sharp.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#16
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingley
Hi Kully -- Congrats on getting the Canon 50/1.5! I predict you will love this lens -- it is v. different than the Nokton, particularly wide open. Nice to have BOTH of these lenses: old school Sonnar design v. new school sharp edge to edge wide open. Hypothetically speaking, that is.... 
|
I don't want to cause anger at my home, so the Canon 50/1.5 is on my next target list. The J-3 will have to do for right now as my 1.5 Sonnar lens.
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 715
|
Let me know how the 1.4 is Raid! I'm hoping to get to see the local one in a few days. You nabbed that one at KEH, didn't you? I was eyeing that one as well. 
|
|
|
|
03-29-2008
|
#18
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by morgan
Let me know how the 1.4 is Raid! I'm hoping to get to see the local one in a few days. You nabbed that one at KEH, didn't you? I was eyeing that one as well. 
|
Morgan,
Yes, I bought the one at KEH, hoping that it turns out to be a good one. I saw it, and five minutes later I bought it.
|
|
|
|
03-30-2008
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 715
|
Well, congrats! Let me know how this one works out for you. It looked in decent shape.
|
|
|
|
03-30-2008
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,336
|
I find the Canon 50/1.4 and the 50/1.5 Nokton to have a very similar signature. I've tried several Nokton's but always went back to the Canon, smaller, faster (almost half stop actually), and better built. The Canon has a very modern signature - sharp corner to corner. I have a hard time distinguishing it at f2 from a Summicron on an 8x10 print.
Roland.
|
|
|
|
03-30-2008
|
#21
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 21,929
|
This is all good to know about. I will sell my extra sharp ZOOMZ J-3 since the Canon has a similar speed.
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
bippi is offline
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 58
|
Hi,
Sorry for a newbie question but these canon lenses are not rangefinder
coupled are they?
|
|
|
|
04-02-2008
|
#23
|
|
Digited User
jmilkins is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: landdownunder
Age: 43
Posts: 709
|
I was really surprised by the canon 50/1.4. I too was expecting a few "flaws" despite reading that it was well regarded - "some people say one of the best 50 LTMs" as per our Bartender.
Here's my favorite shot from the first roll with it and new P at f4.
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:11. |
|
|