Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Zeiss Contax

Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old Contax
Old 04-16-2005   #1
hint123
Registered User
 
hint123 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3
Old Contax

Hello !

Anyone using Contax IIa or IIIa here?? I'm very interested to know more about this camera. The camera is a post-war classic camera, when I look at the camera, it seems very different from the rangefinder I see today (Leica M6 or Bessa R). I would like to know how to operate this camera & how does the meter works (selenium meter).

I'm currently using the Canonet QL17, and thinking of getting a interchangable lense rangefinder. Those camera without built-in meter is out of consideration because I don't know how to use them, and I don't want to carry another external meter.

Well, many people suggest me to use Voigtlander Bessa. It's a very good camera indeed, but there is some manufacturing quality problem (shutter, alignment problem), and I still prefer classic camera.

Please share with me your opinion. Thank you!
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #2
Socke
Registered User
 
Socke is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,920
Yes, we have Contax II and III users here, as well as Kiev 2, 3 and 4 users. We're all around RFF.

Compared to a modern RF, the Contax II and III and the FSU copies are very old and skilled technicians as well as spareparts are rare.

A Kiev is a good starter, I got my 1970 Kiev 4 with a Jupiter 8 50mm/f2 lens for 51 Euro including a one year waranty at a local dealer.

It is a fine camera and it is fun using it, but the Contax G2 is a far better picture taking machine. That starts at setting exposure and stops at TTL-Flash.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #3
wlewisiii
StayAtHome Dad & Photog
 
wlewisiii's Avatar
 
wlewisiii is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Madison, WI
Age: 49
Posts: 5,340
And even a looney using a Kiev 5 Socke is right though, a Kiev is an excellent way to get a good solid everyday user camera that is compatable with all the various old Contax mount lenses. The Kiev 4a and 4am are probably the best place to begin as they are reasonably new and are significantly cheaper than the older cameras. Get one with a nice Jupiter 8 lens and you'll have a really fun camera. Two good places to get one from are www.okvintagecamera.com or www.fedka.com/catalog/

New cameras are great, but there is something about the old ones that can be a heck of a lot of fun as well.

Enjoy and welcome to the friendly insane asylum!

William
__________________
My Gallery
My Best Pictures

Playing and learning daily with: 4x5 Crown Graphic, Leica IIIf w/ 50/2 Summitar, Nikon F2 Photomic w/ 50/1.4 & Olympus E-PL1.

"Some people are 'the glass is half full' types. Some people are 'the glass is half empty' types. I'm a 'the glass is full of radioactive waste and I just drank half of it' type. And I'm still thirsty." -- Bill Mattocks
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #4
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,833
I use the original Contax RFs all the time (II's & IIa's). I think you're greatly limiting yourself by insisting on a built-in meter, as the selenium meters on the III & IIIa aren't that great even when working (& aren't coupled w/the shutter or aperture as on a modern camera), so you really aren't gaining much in convenience. Modern handheld meters, like the Gossen Digisix or Sekonic equivalent, & shoe-mounted meters, like the Cosina Voigtlander VC 1 or 2, are very small (smaller than most cell phones) & much more accurate & reliable than old selenium meters found on the III & IIIa. Also, selenium meters have problems in low-light conditions (although they are more color-balanced in their sensitivity compared to more modern CDs & SiliconBlue cells). Moreover, IMHO, many of the greatest cameras ever made, RF & otherwise, are meterless (e.g., Leica M3, Nikon SP, Canon P, etc.).

Quote:
Originally Posted by hint123
Hello !

Anyone using Contax IIa or IIIa here?? I'm very interested to know more about this camera. The camera is a post-war classic camera, when I look at the camera, it seems very different from the rangefinder I see today (Leica M6 or Bessa R). I would like to know how to operate this camera & how does the meter works (selenium meter).

I'm currently using the Canonet QL17, and thinking of getting a interchangable lense rangefinder. Those camera without built-in meter is out of consideration because I don't know how to use them, and I don't want to carry another external meter.

Well, many people suggest me to use Voigtlander Bessa. It's a very good camera indeed, but there is some manufacturing quality problem (shutter, alignment problem), and I still prefer classic camera.

Please share with me your opinion. Thank you!
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #5
Honu-Hugger
Registered User
 
Honu-Hugger is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sun Valley, ID Corona del Mar, CA
Posts: 1,533
I use them occasionally....
__________________
D2
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #6
hint123
Registered User
 
hint123 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3
Thank you very much for you all to sharing with me your experience in using old classic RF. I just send in my QL17 for re-condition because the viewfinder is blur & the up-down alignment is out.

I have not made up my mind yet which RF to buy. There are a lot of choices actually, and I'm still not sure which one will suit me well. I like those small & solid RFs because I think it's what we need in photography. Compared to bulky SLR (I own a D70 as well), RF is just simple & easy. I don't have to buy a big camera bag to put my camera stuffs.

There is no perfect machine and I'm still hesitating.........
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #7
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
The Contax is an excellent camera, but uses a more complex internal/external bayonet than the more prevalent Leica Screw Mount. I have a Contax IIIa. The Nikon RF's have "basically" the same physical mount, have a much larger viewfinder, cost more, and do not have a built in meter.

The Canon 7 uses Leica Screw Mount lenses, has a built in meter (also selenium), projexted framelines for 35/50/85/100 and 135mm lenses. It also has metal shutter curtains. Price is about the same as a Contax IIIa.

Last edited by Brian Sweeney : 04-17-2005 at 04:05.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-16-2005   #8
Wayne R. Scott
Half fast Leica User
 
Wayne R. Scott's Avatar
 
Wayne R. Scott is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Iowa
Age: 60
Posts: 1,307
I also shoot Contax IIa and IIIa cameras. I use the following meter with my Contax IIa:
http://www.fredparker.com/ultexp1.htm

I'll attach a couple of indoor shots where I used the ulitimate exposure computer.

I use other rangefinders also. Mainly Canon Ql17 G-III, Yashica Elctro 35 GSN, Koni-Omega 6x7, and Crown Graphic 4x5.

Wayne
__________________
One's skill is never complete, one's knowledge is forever lacking, one's taste is invariably altered, one's opinion ever subject to controversy. There is a complete and constant urge toward improvement...
-Andrew Loomis.


"Good Judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement."
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-17-2005   #9
Duncan Ross
Say it with flashbulbs
 
Duncan Ross's Avatar
 
Duncan Ross is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Scotland
Age: 45
Posts: 215
I think getting a cheap Kiev 4M is good advice, it will give you the chance to try the Contax experience without the expense and it takes fine pictures. They have also reached a stable price so you will be able to sell it again for the same money you paid for it. And anything you buy that fits it will also fit the Contax. Set yourself a budget of £35 and have fun!

These are very addictive cameras. It is a very slow and deliberate way of taking pictures but the cameras are solid and heavy and smell of metal, oil and leather and are wonderful to use. My Kiev is my main camera and turns heads wherever I go, especially with the flashbulb gun attached. Recently I heard two fellas saying;

"What is it?"
"Dunno but it gets satellite TV!"

Go on, you know you have to get one now.....
__________________
Finally reduced the collection to two Kievs!
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Contax Classic RF Hawkeye34 Zeiss Contax 71 04-29-2010 05:32
Contax and Nikon "F" Series Parable Honu-Hugger Rangefinder Photography Discussion 10 04-11-2005 13:16
Contax II........Serviced by ..... Canon P Rangefinder Photography Discussion 1 12-31-2004 20:53



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 19:23.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.