Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Help Me Sell My CV 90mm
Old 01-16-2008   #1
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Help Me Sell My CV 90mm

Ok, I think everyone agrees that the CV90mm f3.5 is a sharp lens. I bought it as a portrait lens for my R3A. Unfortunately, I've failed to produce any decent results.
I hit the focus point well enough, but for all of the other reasons that photos fail...mine did.
Anyway, it's up for sale. I have a question from a potential buyer about suitability of the lens on a short baseline camera like the R3A.
So...I need to see you portrait shots taken with the 90mm f3.5 and your R3A...to show it can be done and just needs a better RF photographer than me to get it done.

Thanks,
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #2
pvdhaar
Zoom with your feet!
 
pvdhaar's Avatar
 
pvdhaar is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 2,845
I used the CV90/3.5 on a Hexar RF, and even though its viewfinder has an even smaller magnification than the R for which the lens was originally designed, focussing was never a problem. Something you've already confirmed with your R3A..

What made me decide to sell the 90 was the framing. On a 0.6x finder, the 90mm frame lines were so small that I had big problems composing.. I wouldn't be surprised if a 1x finder makes framing a 90 is a lot easier.

But if your buyer already has an R3A, nothing should keep him/her from bringing up the 90mm frames and see whether they're comfortable enough work with..
__________________
Kind regards,

Peter

My Hexländer Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #3
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Still hoping for some examples to help me sell this lens.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #4
CameraQuest
Head Bartender
 
CameraQuest is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: over the hills from Malibu
Posts: 3,672
the R2 A / M or R3 A / M will all focus the 90/3.5 accurately.
they were designed with that in mind.

the R4 A/M on the other hand, no.

Stephen
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #5
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,294
I have repeatedly and reliably focused a 90/2.8 at close distance, wide open on R3a.
Not sure if you want examples, since it's a different lens. But focusing the 90/3.5
you can for sure on that camera.

Roland.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #6
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Everyone agrees it can be done...still...no pictures!

:-)
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #7
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,294
OK, you asked for it. Tele Elmarit wide open on Bessa:



There is a thread somewhere where RayPA compares portraits
taken with the Apo Lanthar with other lenses.

Best,

Roland.

Last edited by ferider : 01-16-2008 at 11:18.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #8
kb244
Registered User
 
kb244 is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Grand Rapids, Mi
Age: 32
Posts: 380
Quote:
Originally Posted by ferider
OK, you asked for it. Tele Elmarit wide open on Bessa:
Erm, I think he's hoping for pics shot with the Lanthar so that he can use the images in a sale to promote the 90mm he's selling.

Course I'd verify I had the photographer's permission before doing something like that, let alone it doesnt fit well with folks to use an example not taken with the actual lens for sale. (I don't mean just with a CV90, but with the "actual" lens for sale as one copy may not fairly represent another when selling it).
__________________
Karl Blessing

Last edited by kb244 : 01-16-2008 at 12:08.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #9
wray
Registered User
 
wray's Avatar
 
wray is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 654
Okay, here's a pic shot with that actual lens on my R3A. I sold that lens to Steve!


Last edited by wray : 01-16-2008 at 12:47.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #10
ferider
Registered User
 
ferider's Avatar
 
ferider is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 10,294
This is not wide open, wray, correct ?
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #11
wray
Registered User
 
wray's Avatar
 
wray is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Riverside, California
Posts: 654
No, not wide open or there would have been better blur in the background. I very rarely if ever shoot wide open - just not my style!
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #12
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Not that I don't like it Wray.... :-)

I've now tried the cv75 and the 90. Both were good. I'm just not liking tele on a RF.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #13
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,667
Quote:
Originally Posted by dazedgonebye
Not that I don't like it Wray.... :-)

I've now tried the cv75 and the 90. Both were good. I'm just not liking tele on a RF.

i think i may be in the same position.
i used to like the 90 on my former cle and used it quite a bit but since the advent of my liking wide angles i just can't seem to be comfortable with a longer lens. i thought maybe the 75 would be easier than the 90 but so far, not so.

joe
__________________
heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100


"learn the rules like a pro, so you can break them like an artist"
pablo picasso

...it is very simple to be happy, but it is very difficult to be simple...
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-16-2008   #14
minoltist7
pussy photographer
 
minoltist7's Avatar
 
minoltist7 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Odessa, Ukraine
Posts: 383
not so much pics... even on such huge sites as pbase and flickr
it seems, people not use it very often (becouse of inconvenience on RF ? )
altough, photozone.de tested it on Nikon DSLR (another version, but same lens design), and regarded it's outstanding sharpness
__________________
Bessa R3A, Minolta Dynax 7, Olympus OM2, Bronica SQ-A, Iskra. No digital crap!!!

member gallery
me on flickr

  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.