Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Coffee With Mentors > Peter Dechert -- Photographic Equipment Historian

Peter Dechert -- Photographic Equipment Historian Peter Dechert is best known for his Canon Rangefinder, Canon SLR, and Olympus Pen books, the latter two long out-of-print. He was a monthly columnist for many years for SHUTTERBUG magazine, and has contributed to many others. Most recently he has written about the pre-WW2 Zeiss 35mm cameras, but his interests in camera equipment and optics are many and varied. As a pro protographer and honorary life member of ASMP, Peter is also expert in using the gear! IMPORTANT READ THIS: CWE Forum hosts have moderation powers within their forum. Please observe copyright laws by not copying and posting their material elsewhere without permission.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Identify this Canon Rangefinder
Old 11-24-2007   #1
NIKON KIU
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
 
NIKON KIU's Avatar
 
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 51
Posts: 1,865
Identify this Canon Rangefinder

I thought this makes a good topic.
There are camera fans out there like me who wouldn't know a Kwanon from a Canon.
May be this thread could help in identifying which camera we may have or are looking to have.

To Start I ask, Which Canon is this?




Thanks in advance.

Kiu
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #2
thirteen
Registered User
 
thirteen is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto Canada
Posts: 147
It's a IIIb. It came bundled with the Serenar f1.9 lens. The top plate speed dial includes speeds of 1/20, 1/30, 1/40, 1/60, 1/100 etc. If the camera was a IIIc the speeds would include 1/25, 1/40, 1/60, 1/100 etc.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #3
dexdog
sans bokeh
 
dexdog's Avatar
 
dexdog is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,451
According to Dechert's book, it is a IIb. Serial number matches range given in book, and shutter speed split at 1/20 matches. The book says that the IIb usually had a 50/3.5 or 50/1.9 Serenar as the normal lens.
__________________
_____________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #4
Bill Snell
Registered User
 
Bill Snell is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Invercargill New Zealand
Posts: 30
I go along with Model II-B. 1948-50. Came with Serenar 50mm f2 Top speed 1/500. Replaced in 1950 by Model III with 1/1000 top speed. Source Canon user manual for IV-S2
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #5
jan normandale
Film is the other way
 
jan normandale's Avatar
 
jan normandale is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: on Location
Posts: 4,023
mehhh ... it's only a ... Canon

humour! This is a good thread. Now I want this resolved in a civil manner without pulling guns or arm wrestling to determine the actual type of camera. I'm watching
__________________
RFF Gallery
flickr
Blog

it's all about light
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #6
CanonRFinder
Registered User
 
CanonRFinder's Avatar
 
CanonRFinder is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Perth west OZ
Age: 69
Posts: 305
YEP it is a model IIB be it an early version as is the lens. The <jap ideogram> marking on the baseplate is unusual but NOT uncommon. This marking only came out when the model IIB was introduced onto the market and replaced the <CPO> marking. Bit of a dog as it is also missing the infinity lock on the lens. It also has a PC connection placed on the front. All this plus the condition of the body covering kept it's value down. Tthere was a Nikkor lens with the outfit and wasn't sure of the value of that or it's place in the Nikkor line of lenses. Kiu should be able to throw some light on that. Peter K
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #7
Wompa
Amature Photogeek
 
Wompa's Avatar
 
Wompa is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Västerås, Sweden
Age: 23
Posts: 26
I think its fun with the litle text on the bottom. Made in ocupied Japan... Thihi!
__________________
Zorki-4
Jupiter-8 f2.8/50, Actina 42, Sunpak GX17

Ricoh 35 ZF
Rikenon f2.8/43, Sunpak GX17

Pentax K100D Super
Pentax DA 18-55

Missing

Asahi Pentax KX
SMC Pentax 1:3.5/28, SMC Pentax 1:3.5/135, HOYA HMC Skylight (1B) 52mm, Sunpak Auto20

"It's an ingenious solution to a problem that should never have existed in the first place" James May

My photos
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #8
dexdog
sans bokeh
 
dexdog's Avatar
 
dexdog is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,451
Kiu, I'm shocked that you would be the initiator of this Canon thread! Doesn't that get you kicked out of the NHS for treason, or something?
__________________
_____________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #9
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is online now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,136
well, at least the very earliest Canon cameras had Nikkor lenses, so Kiu can be concerned about certain models much earlier than this IIb.
__________________
My Gallery

Last edited by xayraa33 : 11-24-2007 at 16:35.
  Reply With Quote

Old 11-24-2007   #10
dexdog
sans bokeh
 
dexdog's Avatar
 
dexdog is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanonRFinder
There was a Nikkor lens with the outfit and wasn't sure of the value of that or it's place in the Nikkor line of lenses. Kiu should be able to throw some light on that. Peter K
I see, this was part of an auction. Did the auction have a 50/1.5 Nikkor, by any chance?
__________________
_____________________
  Reply With Quote

Is mine like Yours?
Old 01-25-2008   #11
fehutchings
fred hutchings
 
fehutchings is offline
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: gulfport mississippi
Posts: 3
Smile Is mine like Yours?

I own it's brother (sister???) sn 37113 with the 50 1.9 serenar sn 37072. There is NO flash sync, and the lens HAS an infinity lock. Suppose they traveled through life together. Both work flawlessly (less said about the viewfinder the better). Do have one thing I noted. Camera in the picture shows an engraved diamond shape above the "made in occupied japan." My camera does not. Is this significant? I like the IIb choice. Everything else seems to fit.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2008   #12
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is online now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,136
it is CPO written in ideogram for" central purchasing office," an early form of the EP mark for cameras sold in PX stores.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2008   #13
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
 
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,190
Let's avoid the slurs if we can ("jap ideogram"). The war's long over. If that wasn't the intent, my apologies.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2008   #14
Solinar
Analog Preferred
 
Solinar's Avatar
 
Solinar is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,058
It's probably an Aussie slang.

Although, I must admit if an Aussie was to refer to the locals in certain bars as "Yanks" in parts of Texas or Alabama, it could turn out to be problematic .
__________________
- Andrew in Austin, Texas -

35mm Gear Bessa R, Leica II, - IIIf RD/ST, - IIIg, - M3
Medium Format Fuji GW 690III / Minolta Autocord
MF Folders Agfa Record III and Super Isolette / Voigtlander Perkeo II and Bessa II
Digital a D300 with a some primes

"Who spilled the Dektol on the bathroom carpet?"
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-25-2008   #15
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is online now
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,136
someone has used the Jay word.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Iib
Old 01-26-2008   #16
pdek
"Dekkam" as was
 
pdek is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 59
Iib

Don't know where I was when this string of correspondence was posted. The camera is definitely a Canon IIB, as many have replied, with the proper Canon Serenar f/1.9 normal lens, and the Japanese ideograms in a diamond that indicate the camera was made for US military sale outlets. Lens and camera were probably manufactured in early 1949.
Peter D
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-26-2008   #17
harry01562
Registered semi-lurker
 
harry01562's Avatar
 
harry01562 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: central MA
Posts: 637
I'd like to see a full clarification of the time frame that the Post Exchange markings were in use. As I recall, the <CPO> was used prior to <japanese>, and last was <EP>. I do know that the first two are not as common as the <EP> marking, but not certain of the period of real use...

Anyone??

Harry
__________________
<a
Leica M3, IIIf RD ST, IIIa, Summar and Summitar
Canon 7, 7s, 7sz, P, VI-T, plus 10 from SII to IV-Sb2, + 14 50's for body caps
Contax IIa, IIIa, Rollei 2.8f, Ansco Auto Reflex, Crown 2x3, Speed 2x3, Busch 2x3, Mamiya G
So many cameras, so little time

Last edited by harry01562 : 01-26-2008 at 11:35.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:16.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.