Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > RFF Polls

View Poll Results: Do you use a digital watch
Yes! I have one of the early ones with red LEDs. 8 2.76%
Yes. It's cheaper and more accurate than a mechanical watch. 40 13.79%
Yes. And I placed my order for the M8, before it came out. 2 0.69%
No. But I did buy an M8. 27 9.31%
No. I listen to it ticking quietly as I fall into an analogue sleep. 131 45.17%
No. And I'm using a typewriter to browse the web. 18 6.21%
I don't wear watches. I just ask other people. 52 17.93%
Don't know. 12 4.14%
Voters: 290. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Old 07-18-2007   #26
colinh
Registered User
 
colinh's Avatar
 
colinh is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Munich
Age: 45
Posts: 507
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvdhaar
I think we'd first have to decide what a digital watch is..

Anything that needs a battery is a digital watch. The battery drives a digital circuit that counts oscillations in a piece of crystal. What's done with the counted cycles is another matter, some watches show the result in digits (LED/LCD), others move a pair of hands around..
Quote:
Originally Posted by varjag
Strictly speaking the circuit doesn't have to be digital, impulse is sufficient

Well, my analogue watch has an escapement which oscillates at 32768 Hz ( I think). I think we can define analogue as having an analogue display. You're thinking of quartz v. automatic/mechanical.

colin
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #27
einolu
Registered User
 
einolu is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 778
I have one of these that I wear to work/school. I like how it looks, how light it is, and how easy it is to set the alarm (it's also loud enough to wake me in the mornings but not loud enough to irritate me). The stopwatch can also be helpful sometimes. I usually don't wear a watch when I'm not at work. I also have a pretty nice mechanical (I don't like automatics because I don't wear watches enough, perfer to just wind them on the weekends) watch that looks a lot more expensive than it was that I like to wear sometimes.

I like both vintage-like digital watches and fine mechanical ones. I would love if someone were to give me a Jaeger LeCoultre one of these days...
__________________

einarsodinecs.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #28
thawkins
thawkins
 
thawkins's Avatar
 
thawkins is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Age: 63
Posts: 209
I wear a 1968 Omega Speedmaster that is contemporary with the rangefinder cameras I enjoy using. I bought the first rangefinder in 1967 (Retina 2a) and the watch the next year. Both work perfectly.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #29
tominabox1
Registered User
 
tominabox1 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 84
Why do we keep up with this digital vs film stuff?

I still use a film watch.

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #30
juhor
Registered User
 
juhor's Avatar
 
juhor is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
Posts: 45
I've got a digital watch that's made in Finland. I got it from my father because he likes he's older mechanical watch better. I usually forget to put it in my hand and so it stays at home, I think that the battery has ran out and I have to buy a new one. (glad Suunto designed it so that the user can change the battery!)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg x6hr_large_2c90d.jpg (56.2 KB, 47 views)
__________________
Darkroom slave and occasionally a photographer.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #31
mjflory
Accumulator
 
mjflory's Avatar
 
mjflory is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 61
Posts: 292
Like a rangefinder camera, a wristwatch should help us focus on the essentials.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Lunch_watch.jpg (35.4 KB, 31 views)
__________________
-- Michael
This is my LAST body!
(Agrajag, in Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy)
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-18-2007   #32
Chris101
Lytro Shooter
 
Chris101's Avatar
 
Chris101 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,647
I'd put this on my wrist:

http://www.yugop.com/ver3/stuff/03/fla.html
__________________
101-365
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2007   #33
wolves3012
Registered User
 
wolves3012's Avatar
 
wolves3012 is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Wolverhampton, UK
Age: 56
Posts: 2,424
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvdhaar
I think we'd first have to decide what a digital watch is..

Anything that needs a battery is a digital watch. The battery drives a digital circuit that counts oscillations in a piece of crystal. What's done with the counted cycles is another matter, some watches show the result in digits (LED/LCD), others move a pair of hands around..

So, despite having a analog looking faceplate, my day to day watch is digital..
Strictly speaking...you're quite right, yet wrong! The "digital" refers to discrete steps rather than a continuously varying amount. The counter in an analogue or digtal-display electronic watch is digital in the proper sense. Even the finger movement is digital in the strict sense, because the fingers move in jumps. Saying that, a mechanical watch does this too (in smaller steps) so you could argue it too is digital.

To answer the poll question, I have one digital-display watch, a Casio from the mid 80s. I have two electronic analogue watches: a Tag Heuer and a Citizen eco-drive. Mechanical watches were my father's hobby, however, and I have numerous mechanical watches, from the cheap and common through to high-quality ones. Most of them work, some don't. I even have a hand-made pocket watch dating from 1834; it works but the timekeeping leaves a lot to be desired!
__________________
Zorki: 1e (x2), 2C, 3M, 4, 4K, 5, 6
FED: NKVD, 1g, 2e, 3a, 3b, 4L (x2), 5B, 5C
Kiev 4, 4A
Leica IIIC
Yashica Minister III
Zenith C, Zenit C, Zenit E
Minolta XG M, Z1
Nikon P50

"The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason."- Benjamin Franklin
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2007   #34
cmedin
Registered User
 
cmedin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Sweden
Age: 39
Posts: 861
I can't really fit my Tissot T-Touch into any of the poll answers. It's a neat little (well, not so little) thing though.
__________________
http://storpotaten.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2007   #35
Morca007
Matt
 
Morca007's Avatar
 
Morca007 is offline
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 828
I like watches, I hate wearing them. I use my cell phone to check the time.
__________________
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2007   #36
nobbylon
Registered User
 
nobbylon's Avatar
 
nobbylon is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Nederlands
Posts: 1,846
1986 Submariner and been on my wrist since then!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2007   #37
flashfirenze
Registered User
 
flashfirenze's Avatar
 
flashfirenze is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: New York City
Posts: 39
I have this watch
Attached Images
File Type: jpg cf0e_1.JPG (23.8 KB, 43 views)
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-14-2007   #38
Thea
Registered User
 
Thea is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 91
I use my mobile phone....is that digital?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-25-2007   #39
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 57
Posts: 4,633
Hmm...

Quote:
Originally Posted by StuartR
I was given a nice watch when I got my masters, but I only wear it when I travel...normally I just use my cell phone...so I guess that's digital. In some ways, the watch is becoming obsolete as its function is so simple and so easily integrated into the other devices most of us now bring with us everywhere. Watches are now far more about jewelry than about function compared to times past.
Maybe. But...I'm so thoroughly "modern" that I use a Bluetooth earset when I'm getting around by bicycle (which is most of the time), so the phone itself is tucked away someplace where I can't easily reach for it. A wristwatch requires, well, a flick-o-the-wrist to get the time, something no high-tech non-wrist-worn device can top.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuolumne
I prefer analogue watches but also have many digital watches. How about the Accutron: an analogue digital watch!

/T
Not digital, strictly speaking: the original Accutrons (not the stuff Bulova's pushing now under the Accutron name) operated via a miniature tuning fork. Also, Hamilton's electric watches, which predated the Accutron by a handful of years (1957) also were not digital, strictly speaking. Working examples of both have become collectors' items, despite the questionable reliability of early Hamilton electrics.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvdhaar
I think we'd first have to decide what a digital watch is..

Anything that needs a battery is a digital watch. The battery drives a digital circuit that counts oscillations in a piece of crystal. What's done with the counted cycles is another matter, some watches show the result in digits (LED/LCD), others move a pair of hands around..

So, despite having a analog looking faceplate, my day to day watch is digital..
See above.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHub
A Speedmaster, a Seamaster & a Tag Heuer. I rotate them.
Had (and lost) a Speedy Pro. Fantastic watch, with an honest pedigree. Puts Rolex Daytonas in their place. Good enough for NASA (still), good enough for me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wolves3012
Strictly speaking...you're quite right, yet wrong! The "digital" refers to discrete steps rather than a continuously varying amount. The counter in an analogue or digtal-display electronic watch is digital in the proper sense. Even the finger movement is digital in the strict sense, because the fingers move in jumps. Saying that, a mechanical watch does this too (in smaller steps) so you could argue it too is digital.

To answer the poll question, I have one digital-display watch, a Casio from the mid 80s. I have two electronic analogue watches: a Tag Heuer and a Citizen eco-drive. Mechanical watches were my father's hobby, however, and I have numerous mechanical watches, from the cheap and common through to high-quality ones. Most of them work, some don't. I even have a hand-made pocket watch dating from 1834; it works but the timekeeping leaves a lot to be desired!
Here again, technology throws a curve-ball: Seiko, sometime in the 80s, created a quartz analog movement with a smooth sweep-second hand (no discrete "steps"). This was used both in watches (the first being a "doctor's" watch with a "pulsations" scale on the dial), and table alarm clocks (we have one of those in the house). We also have a pair of Kikkerland quartz wall clocks with a similar movement, as well as Solari-style flipping day/date display. Tres cool, except for when the Solari display occasionally gets stuck.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nikonhswebmaster
Not much use for a watch, since my cell phone has accurate time.

Watches, are never the right time, why carry one unless you are treking? And what a sad person one would be to need a watch on vacation.

Never need a watch anyway, I am always where I am, so knowing the time is of no value since it is not a transporter. If someone believes I am late there is nothing a watch can do for me.
Accuracy? Depends on the watch. One of the most well-regulated ("accurate" can be somewhat a slippery description) watches I own is a manual-wind Hamilton
from the mid-60s; I can almost swear that I've had some cheap digital numbers that weren't a lot better than this one. But there's a caveat to this, which I'll get to shortly.

Yes, a cell phone's clock function is deadly-accurate (or at leas as much so as the time signal it's contantly referencing). But how about convenience? Ever watch someone fumble and dance for their phone when it's ringing? (Womenfolk seem to struggle more than menfolk here, but that's another matter.) Think they'll want to do this just to get the time?

As for me: I have a 15 year old Casio "hybrid" (analog dial with digital display inset) for day-to-day stuff, but my heart lies with a quartet of manual-wind Hamiltons, including one two-register chronograph that's scheduled to be rebuilt. All four just tell time (plus the chronograph's stop-watch function). No auto-wind rotors, or day/date displays cluttering the dial, on any of them. Just wind, set, and go, which to me is the perfect formula when owning more than one watch. They all keep very good time, which is all I need when taking a quick glance at my wrist. Yes, I have a PDA, several computers (all connected to the 'Net full-time), a cell phone, plus a stove, microvave oven, and a few other sundry items besides with a clock built into them. But, no, they do not render my watches obsolete, because at any given moment, when I want to know the time, the only thing within range is the watch upon my wrist. And, that watch (okay, any watch other than the Casio), with it's simple, elegant dial, telling the time of day and nothing else, is a gentle reminder of time's passing without making me feel a "slave" to time.

I also have a manual-wind Tiffany travel clock, a gorgeous thing that I picked up at an antuques shop a few years back, but unfortunately needs a new staff for the movement, which has to be fabricated...meaning not cheap. But I want it working as a bedside clock, because, weird as it sounds, I sleep better with a gently ticking clock as opposed to something with a glaring digital display.

And, all the while, my all-time favorite camera – my pair of Hexar RFs, are about as "digital" as a film-shooting camera can be without wearing its digital-ness, ahem, on its sleeve...


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.

Last edited by amateriat : 09-25-2007 at 20:02.
  Reply With Quote

yes...digital
Old 09-25-2007   #40
photobizzz
Speak of the Devil
 
photobizzz's Avatar
 
photobizzz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Eagle River, AK (Anchorage Area)
Age: 38
Posts: 531
yes...digital

[I do wear a digital watch, it actually tells the time in 25 zones, has 5 alarms, tells temperture, barometer, compass, altimiter, oh and it is also solar with a titanium band. Over the top? Well I am in the military and am stationed in Iraq so I guess you wear what suits your needs.
Attached Images
File Type: gif prg-90t-7vdr.gif (13.9 KB, 37 views)
__________________
CONTAX RTS II - Zeiss 28/2.8 Distagon, 35/2.8 Distagon, 50/1.4 Planar


www.selectivevisionsphotography.info
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-25-2007   #41
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 57
Posts: 4,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by photobizzz
[I do wear a digital watch, it actually tells the time in 25 zones, has 5 alarms, tells temperture, barometer, compass, altimiter, oh and it is also solar with a titanium band. Over the top? Well I am in the military and am stationed in Iraq so I guess you wear what suits your needs.
I'd say you're entitled to wear it. Be careful out there...


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-25-2007   #42
windraider
Registered User
 
windraider is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 78
I can agree with the opinion that watches are more of jewellery than tools of necessity in this day and age. Even though quartz watches are cheaper and more accurate, I usually wear automatics during the weekdays at work as I prefer their classical look.

Quote:
Originally Posted by photobizzz
[I do wear a digital watch, it actually tells the time in 25 zones, has 5 alarms, tells temperture, barometer, compass, altimiter, oh and it is also solar with a titanium band. Over the top? Well I am in the military and am stationed in Iraq so I guess you wear what suits your needs.
My weekend watches are Protreks too (PRG-80 & PRT-40) - love the barometer for forecasting the weather & the backlight. Used a Casio Diver style watch with hybrid analog & digital display when I was in the army (Protreks weren't out yet).

Take care out there.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1954'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #43
kross
sonnarism
 
kross's Avatar
 
kross is offline
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atlantis Island
Posts: 170
when i use my 20d, i put on my G-shock... when i use my m6, i wear my tag heuer automatic.... when i use my lomo, i put on my hamilton mechanical....
__________________
flickr me coz i'm rangefinding.....

Exposure medium:
Then - 100% sensor, 0% film
Now - 50% film, 50% sensor
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #44
KoNickon
Nick Merritt
 
KoNickon is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hartford, CT USA
Age: 54
Posts: 2,190
I guess I am hopelessly behind the curve -- the idea of using your cell phone as a watch strikes me as ludicrous. But then, I'm one of those people who does not leave the cell phone on.

I have as my weekend watch a Casio that I spent $15 on over 20 years ago. It's only on its second battery. The other watches I wear are all inexpensive (with one exception) quartz analog jobs, one of which was a 10-year work anniversary gift. Digital display is not cool in an office/suit environment -- doesn't really fit in.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #45
bmicklea
RF Newbie
 
bmicklea's Avatar
 
bmicklea is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Age: 39
Posts: 177
Digital watches make me grumpy, like beautiful women who hide their faces with hats or long bangs.

My analog watch is battery powered but I have recurring dreams of getting a true automatic. Strangely I'm always wearing an antique Omega automatic watch in the dreams where I'm photographing with an M2. A great mechanical instrument is so much more impressive than a clever electronic gizmo. Perhaps I'm biased working with computers all the time though...
__________________
-Brad


My RFF Gallery

Newest Shots

  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #46
CorreCaminos
CorreCaminos
 
CorreCaminos's Avatar
 
CorreCaminos is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 160
Analog watches only (Breitling Blackbird currently)
Analog cameras only (Leica, Hasselblad, & Nikon)
And if I could buy a new car with carburetors instead of EFI I would too. Seriously.

I just don't trust electronics with the stuff I really care about.
__________________
Miguel Asensio
Austin, Texas

---------------------
http://www.miguelasensio.com/
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #47
victoriapio
Registered User
 
victoriapio is offline
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Victoria, Texas
Posts: 490
I have Rolex Datejust, Omega Seamaster, Elgin gold analog - all these are in the safe and for sale if anyone needs one.

I WEAR a Casio G-shock digital (solar powered, downloads exact time everyday from the atomic clock in Colorado) and an Orvis white faced analog quartz on dress up days at work. These two watches cost less than $75. G-shock is perfect for swimming, bike riding, outdoor photography and rangefinder work ;>)

O.C.
__________________
www.ocgarzaphotography.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #48
rc12k
Piper at the Gates
 
rc12k is offline
Join Date: May 2007
Location: The Buckeye State
Posts: 6
My everyday watch is a Citizen Nighthawk. My self defense watch is a reissue Doxa 300T.
I tried the Rolex kool-aid decades ago and didn't like it. LOL
__________________
The mind is all she can be and will be all she is . . .
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-26-2007   #49
rbiemer
Unabashed Amateur
 
rbiemer's Avatar
 
rbiemer is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Raquette Lake!
Age: 52
Posts: 4,301
I wear a Timex Camper. Digital? Analog? It has a battery and it has hands. Basic, reasonably water resistant, light, and cheap. Goes well with my Dixon Ticonderoga pencils.
I've spent rather more but none of those watches stood up to the kitchens I work in any better.
Rob
__________________


The path of excess leads to the tower of wisdom.
-- William Blake
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-27-2007   #50
richiedcruz
Registered User
 
richiedcruz's Avatar
 
richiedcruz is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 168
I usually prefer digital wrist watches and mechanical pocket watches, but I did break down recently and buy a cheap battery powered pocket watch.

I have a Timex Ironman Bodylink watch. The fancy one that has a heart rate monitor and keeps track of your mileage with a GPS unit. Its a fun watch, but it goes through batteries so quickly that I usually only use it when I am running, or otherwise do not need to know the time

Richie
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1173'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Digital Bashing gets old.... Don Parsons Off Topic 15 09-25-2007 23:53
Digital Darkroom vs. Digital Camera - a confusion? ch1 Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film 6 06-06-2006 13:28
News: Japan's Olympus sees profits plunge on weak digital camera sales bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 48 11-10-2005 11:47
b&w - a digital after thought? zeos 386sx Leica M Film Cameras 79 07-30-2005 21:09
Leica SLR digital camera MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 0 10-02-2003 14:26



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.