| Fixed Lens RF This forum is dedicated to the numerous and popular fixed lens rangefinders, including but not limited to the Canon Canonets, Konica III and S series, Minoltas, Ricohs, Vivitars, and so many others. Note fixed lens Olympus , Yashicas, Argus and Retina have separate forums. |
 |
Kodak 35 worth fixing? |
 |
07-01-2007
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Farace is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 79
|
Kodak 35 worth fixing?
I can't remember where I got it, but in one of my boxes of stuff, I found I have a Kodak 35 like the one pictured here:
http://kodak.3106.net/index.php?p=210&cam=1302
Everything is a bit stiff and dirty. Is this camera worth my time to fix it up, or is it just a curiosity?
Thanks!
__________________
--Bob Farace
mostly Konicas
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Xmas is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 2,791
|
Before you stick it on e shelf as a curio or use it you could clean it carefully.
Before you use it you could google 'name + problem' or name + jam, etc.
Some people probably still use one. No worse then a kiev...
Noel
__________________
For the last 13 months I've only used a Kiev (or Contax), apart from folders, Fed's, Zorki's, M2, etc.,... and a digital to record dismantle sequences...
|
|
|
|
07-01-2007
|
#3
|
|
Off With The Pixies
Jocko is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: March, Cambridgeshire
Age: 49
Posts: 1,320
|
Our esteemed and sadly scarce friend Regan has an interesting thread on his adventures with a Kodak 35 (read to the end for the payoff!) -
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...t=28065&page=2
I think these are quite interesting cameras: they were widely used by US servicemen during the war, which often lends historical interest. I saw one for sale on the Isle of Wight (off southern England) which had the name, number and unit of an American Colonel engraved on it - possibly he left it there prior to the Normandy Landings. It would have been intriguing to trace the original owner, but I left it too late and it was gone...
Incidentally, General Patton, a great camera-buff, scathingly referred to these as "Five-Dollar Leicas"!
Cheers, Ian
Last edited by Jocko : 07-01-2007 at 07:44.
|
|
|
|
 |
07-01-2007
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Farace is offline
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 79
|
Thanks for the link. I had searched before posting, but for some reason didn't turn anything up.
I guess I won't write it off just yet. It is an odd-looking camera, almost something HR Giger could use for inspiration. But worth cleaning in my spare time (whatever that is) and running a roll through for giggles.
__________________
--Bob Farace
mostly Konicas
|
|
|
|
 |
Kodak 35 worth fixing? |
 |
07-01-2007
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
bob cole is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Asheville, North Carolina
Posts: 585
|
Kodak 35 worth fixing?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Farace
I can't remember where I got it, but in one of my boxes of stuff, I found I have a Kodak 35 like the one pictured here:
http://kodak.3106.net/index.php?p=210&cam=1302
Everything is a bit stiff and dirty. Is this camera worth my time to fix it up, or is it just a curiosity?
Thanks!
|
------------------------------------------------
Bob, I never heard the Patton quote [ mentioned elsewhere, where he supposedly called them $5 Leicas ] but I believe the Kodak 35 is still a $5 usd camera...my old McKeown's camera guide valued it at $20-$30usd. About 10 years ago I sold one to a camera dealer for $5 and he just put it on display with a bunch of other old cameras...
Last edited by bob cole : 07-01-2007 at 12:16.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
07-01-2007
|
#6
|
|
Off With The Pixies
Jocko is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: March, Cambridgeshire
Age: 49
Posts: 1,320
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bob cole
------------------------------------------------
Bob, I never heard the Patton quote [ mentioned elsewhere, where he supposedly called them $5 Leicas ] but I believe the Kodak 35 is still a $5 usd camera...
|
Hallo Bob. It was a favourite phrase he used on a number of occasions. Patton was an enthusiastic Leica user, but at first feared damaging his camera in action. He thus took a Kodak 35, a decision he quickly regretted. On May 25, 1943, during fighting in North Africa he wrote to his wife Beatrice asking for his Leica and ektachrome film - "I am having trouble with my 35-Eastman Kodak, Damned $5 Leica". A few days later he described being surrounded by admiring troops "with $5 Leicas". You can find this and much more in "Patton's Photographs" by Kevin M. Hymel and "The Patton Papers" vol. 2 by Martin Blumenson. Patton was no great shakes as a photographer (as he happily admitted) but even in the thick of action was never without a camera - his Leica is now on display at the Museum Of Cavalry and Armor, Fort Knox .
Cheers, Ian
Last edited by Jocko : 07-01-2007 at 12:47.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:13. |
|
|