Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Helos-103 for Olympus E300?
Old 06-14-2007   #1
zhang xk
Registered User
 
zhang xk is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 716
Helos-103 for Olympus E300?

Hi Gas comrades,

I have been thinking about using Russian rangefinder optics on a modern digital, but not those hyper expensive M8s. And found out that only the Helios-103 might have the posibility for an Olympus E300 that needs 32mm to clear the mirror movement. The registration for J-8, J-3 are too short, but the H-103 seems to have enough room. One only needs a parts LTM lens mount and mount the lens group of the H-103 to the right regitration distance. The whole set is very compact, and the E300 is a low cost DSLR. Then you have a chance to try those very high qulaity Soviet Summilux without filter or inaccurate rangefinder problems.

I don't have an E300 yet. This is just an idea.

I also tried a Zeiss Tevidon 70/2.8 on a 300D for macro shots. Here is a wide open,100% crop, no any PS image of a water melon before it is consumed.

Cheers,

Zhang
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_6216.JPG (83.6 KB, 42 views)

Last edited by zhang xk : 06-14-2007 at 19:16.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2007   #2
atelier7
Registered User
 
atelier7 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 247
Hello Zhang,
I've got an E500 and the kit lenses starting at f3.5 just aren't fast enough.
they are certainly bulky compared to my bessa r and cv35 kit.
would like to hear more interesting ideas you have.

not sure i'd have the skills to take anything apart though... workable if there are existing adapters one could use.

this may be a completely stupid idea... but what about cine lenses on 4/3rd sensors? would that work?
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2007   #3
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
I guess the Jupiter-11 might work, too (well, yielding a 270/4 lens...)

You'd need a parts Contax mount. The lens would probably fit into the "throat" of the Four Thirds bayonet.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2007   #4
zhang xk
Registered User
 
zhang xk is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by atelier7
Hello Zhang,
I've got an E500 and the kit lenses starting at f3.5 just aren't fast enough.
they are certainly bulky compared to my bessa r and cv35 kit.
would like to hear more interesting ideas you have.

not sure i'd have the skills to take anything apart though... workable if there are existing adapters one could use.

this may be a completely stupid idea... but what about cine lenses on 4/3rd sensors? would that work?
Hi,

A guy has tried a modefied of the super sharp Zeiss Tevidion 100/2.8 on a 4/3 DLSR and the lens focus to infinate. I reversed mounted my Zeiss Tevidon 70/2.8 on a Canon 300D and it focus from about 1.5m-infinate, but only the center 70% image is sharp.Other 35mm cine lenses would cover the image area, but only those with a rear lens element registration of 32mm or longer would focus to infinate.
I hope someone in Russia could hear this idea to make some Helios-103 in Olympus 4/3 DSLR mounts. Some company should think about making a digital camera for those LTM lenses. There is a demand from old LTM lens users. If only Olympus makes an E-series DSLR with a registration of only 3.5mm shorter. The price is right.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2007   #5
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
The problem is that with a 2x crop all you get is a huge variation in portrait and telephoto lenses.
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-14-2007   #6
zhang xk
Registered User
 
zhang xk is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
I guess the Jupiter-11 might work, too (well, yielding a 270/4 lens...)

You'd need a parts Contax mount. The lens would probably fit into the "throat" of the Four Thirds bayonet.
Hi Philipe,

You need to set the lens closer to the sensor, so I think a parts M42 or M39 mount may be more suitable. The I-50,I-22, J-9, J-11 are all O.K for 35mm SLRs so that they could also be used on a DSLR. I have some fine 35mm cine optics. I wish to use them on a DSLR like E300 or the old Pan-F type digital cameras. A 20mm/f2, and a 35mm/f1.28 is a good normal and portait lens on these cameras.

Cheers,

Zhang
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2007   #7
Trius
Waiting on Maitani
 
Trius's Avatar
 
Trius is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Rochester, NY & Toronto area
Posts: 7,828
Manual focus might be an issue, no? With the smaller vf size, I would want a very good focusing screen ... perhaps 45deg split image with microprism surround.
__________________
My Gallery Flickr
Fine grain is a bourgeois concept

Happiness is APX100 and Rodinal 1:100

A bunch o cameras. Does it really matter?
http://weedram.blogspot.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2007   #8
rxmd
May contain traces of nut
 
rxmd's Avatar
 
rxmd is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kyrgyzstan
Posts: 6,023
Hi Zhang,

Quote:
Originally Posted by zhang xk
You need to set the lens closer to the sensor, so I think a parts M42 or M39 mount may be more suitable.
That's true for the Jupiters, but for the Helios? Is there a Helios-103 in LTM at all? I completely agree about 20s and 35s. What's the lens register for those lenses?

Philipp
__________________
Bing! You're hypnotized!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-15-2007   #9
shadowfox
Personal Photography
 
shadowfox's Avatar
 
shadowfox is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,657
Hmmm... I have an E-300 and I have a Helios 103...
but I'm no Brian Sweeney ...
__________________
Have a good light,
Will


  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2007   #10
rolleistef
Registered User
 
rolleistef's Avatar
 
rolleistef is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Paris (France, not Texas!)
Posts: 930
don't you have a LED that says "ok it's on focus" on the camera? There's one on Nikons, but what about the other brands?
__________________
Stéphane
Rolleiflex T, Rolleicord Art Déco, sweet Minolta XD5, dead XGM, X300 and X700 ; Hi-Matic F, Hi-Matic 9, Pentax SP1000 and K20D
My Flickr


RFF EuroMeet 2010-Florence !!!
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-16-2007   #11
zhang xk
Registered User
 
zhang xk is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 716
Quote:
Originally Posted by rxmd
Hi Zhang,


That's true for the Jupiters, but for the Helios? Is there a Helios-103 in LTM at all? I completely agree about 20s and 35s. What's the lens register for those lenses?

Philipp
Hi Philipp,

The lens mount regitration distance is the same, but back focusing distance from the rear element to the film plane varys. It is 28.9mm for the 35/1.28, 30.01mm for the 20/2, 30.71mm for the 50/1.3, and 28.98mm for a 18/2. these can be used on a M8 or RD-1 digital rangefinder. Someone already sell these Arriflex standard mount lenses with an adaptor on the big bay. I think Olympus could make a camera like their old Pan-F in the E-300 price range for these lenses.

Zhang
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Helios 103 Trade tedwhite FSU Former Soviet Union RF 19 05-30-2007 08:02



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:15.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.