Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Ordered A Replacement M8
Old 04-11-2007   #1
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
Talking Ordered A Replacement M8

Well my initial M8 experience was not so great with an out of alignment RF and a really dirty sensor that didn't clean easily. But you know what? I went out to shoot with my D200 the other day and it is so big and heavy now that I've gotten used to the R-D1 that it just wasn't *fun.*

So I'm gonna try again! It doesn't hurt that I have some unexpected cash coming in either!

Likely I'll keep the R-D1 as a "back-up" body for the M8 (assuming of course this one's a keeper!)
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2007   #2
charjohncarter
Registered User
 
charjohncarter's Avatar
 
charjohncarter is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Danville, CA, USA
Posts: 5,921
Did the 'not as much fun' include not as good image quality? I would think so, after viewing some of the M8 images on the web.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-11-2007   #3
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by endustry
I sold my Canon dSLR rig last month -- lock, stock and barrel -- for the same reason, Joe. Bought (well, ordered) a tri-elmar 16-18-21mm w/ universal finder with the money. Any day now...

Yeah I've been considering the WATE.

Where did you order it and how long is the WAIT for the WATE expected to be?
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #4
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
So here's a question for the list:

I have a 1963 DR Summicron 50/2 that won't mount on an M8. I really do like this lens a lot and would find 50mm useful on the M8.

I'd be very happy with a more modern 50/2 cron, there just seem to be so many variations that I'm not sure what to look for.
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #5
Sailor Ted
Registered User
 
Sailor Ted's Avatar
 
Sailor Ted is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Age: 49
Posts: 831
Can't we get our old DR 50mm Summicrons modified to work on our M8's? Perhaps just the use of a file on some protruding little flange on the lens? Anyone?
__________________
My Flickr Gallery:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/67887453@N00/

"So in summation we will finally have the camera everyone has been secretly longing for. Now if the camera takes a truly great shot there will be no debate- it was the iEye that gets all the credit and of course when an image is not to our liking it’s the iEye’s fault. Yes with the iEye only you can determine it’s creative genius."
.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #6
haagen_dazs
Registered User
 
haagen_dazs's Avatar
 
haagen_dazs is offline
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Boston/Cambridge, MA
Posts: 886
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Mondello
would find 50mm useful on the M8.

.
that would be about 66mm on an M8 right?
__________________
Regards, Mark Pang
Massachusetts, New Jersey, Hong Kong, Shanghai, Singapore
G2, M4, Xpan, + other toys
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #7
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
Quote:
Originally Posted by haagen_dazs
that would be about 66mm on an M8 right?

Yup.

Seen some 1970s era 'crons for $6-700.
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #8
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
Why does a watched battery never seem to finish charging!?!?!?! ;-)
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-12-2007   #9
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
Second M8 seems much better than the first. Sensor is dirty (which I really DON'T expect with a brand new camera) but far less dirty than the first one.

BIG dif is focusing which is spot on where the 1st one backfocused quite a bit.

New one came with 1.092 instead of 1.09 and I've just upped it to 1.102

All in all this one feels right.

BTW my humble CV lenses look like they will do quite well on the M8 if the few shots I've taken at my desk are any indication.

It IS better the "second time around" as Sinatra used to say!
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I ordered the M8 - Was it a good decision? petermcwerner Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 36 01-07-2007 02:44
M8 w/ Hard to remove dust. kodachrome64 Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 22 01-02-2007 22:46
Ordered Luigi half case for M8! MP Guy Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 14 11-28-2006 15:24
anyone ordered M8 from Adorama? pass Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 1 11-02-2006 14:19
Anticipated Success of the M8 Trius Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 21 10-23-2006 10:18



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 16:02.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.