Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Fixed Lens RF

Fixed Lens RF This forum is dedicated to the numerous and popular fixed lens rangefinders, including but not limited to the Canon Canonets, Konica III and S series, Minoltas, Ricohs, Vivitars, and so many others. Note fixed lens Olympus , Yashicas, Argus and Retina have separate forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Minolta Hi-Matic...good buy?
Old 03-25-2007   #1
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Question Minolta Hi-Matic...good buy?

Minolta HI-Matic 7 S II WITH FLASH AND LEATHER CASE!
Absolute impulse buy.
The price seemed good and I thought I'd try it.
Does it look like I did ok for one of these?
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #2
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
great price.

risky buy. risky because it's been sitting for awhile but they don't say how long and risky because he uttered those suspecious words. 'i don't know anything about cameras'.
i usually stay away from those auctions.

but for 55 bucks it's a good risk to take.

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #3
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
great price.

risky buy. risky because it's been sitting for awhile but they don't say how long and risky because he uttered those suspecious words. 'i don't know anything about cameras'.
i usually stay away from those auctions.

but for 55 bucks it's a good risk to take.

joe
Seems most sellers use that phrase these days.
Oh well. My luck has been so bad so long that it's bound to get worse!
At least it'll give me some tales of woe to share with all here. Who knows, it might even be alright.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #4
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
steve, it might be fine, maybe a little stiff.

i just bought one myself, with case and minolta flash. have not finished a roll through it yet.
they have a great rep and a sharp lens.

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #5
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,113
An interesting camera the Hi Matic- the lens is pretty darn sharp- I've got one of these I lend out to students to play with. Note that you might need to spin the rings on the lens a bunch of times to grind (perhaps the wrong word) off years of tarnish inside there and allow the contacts to work properly. Mine had 'sat for several years' also and seemed DOA, but this trick worked magic, and it has been a very reliable camera for two years now. Don't know where I heard about it. Enjoy the camera- they are fun- simple, big and clunky, and quite fine performers.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #6
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
I just finished the first roll through mine. I always wanted one, I love Rokkor glass. The negs look sharp as can be, I will scan them this week and we shall see.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #7
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
the minolta 7s2 is not big and clunky...the 7s is though.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #8
filmgoerjuan
Registered User
 
filmgoerjuan's Avatar
 
filmgoerjuan is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, B.C., Canada
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by sepiareverb
Enjoy the camera- they are fun- simple, big and clunky, and quite fine performers.
I'm guessing you might be thinking of the Hi-Matic 7s, which is big and clunky (like a Yashica GSN). The 7s-II is very small and decidely non-clunky.

$55 is a good price if it's working!
__________________
My Flickr Photostream
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #9
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
The 7s from 1965 I think has the same lens as the 9, which is fabulous. I had a nice 9 with a lens better than any other FL RF I have owned, and I have had a few. I have high hopes for the 7sII.

Did I already say that?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #10
jamesdak
Registered User
 
jamesdak is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 12
You should be happy with it and for the price you can't complain. I paid well over $100 for both of mine. As others have said, the lens is really sharp. One of the sharpest lenses I own. Both meters have died on mine but that's not a big deal to me. Usually this is the wire at the battery holder. It's been fixed on one camera already but they didn't do a good job and it did not last. I haven't bothered to try to fix this problem myself as I run Velvia through them and prefer to handmeter anyway. The other issue I have with them is the dim rangefinder patch (yellow square). I am in the process right now of taking one apart to see if that can be improved. I did a comparision test a few years ago between one of my 7sII's and a Olympus 35 RC. The Minolta consistently gave better color and contrast and was markedly sharper. Not bad when you figure the 35 RC's images are quite good when viewed on their own. The 7sII is a small easy to carry daily shooter that you should enjoy. I've got one in the car right now that I use to grab snapshots when needed.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #11
rovnguy
Registered User
 
rovnguy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 259
Quote:
Originally Posted by rover
The 7s from 1965 I think has the same lens as the 9, which is fabulous. I had a nice 9 with a lens better than any other FL RF I have owned, and I have had a few. I have high hopes for the 7sII.

Did I already say that?
I think I bought that 9 from you along with a 7. Both are great cameras and will get a workout this weekend... weather permitting.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=141'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #12
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
Keep sending it west if you sell it. I bought it from a gentleman in Greece. We can send it around the world with some careful planning.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #13
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Another one just finished on the bay for about $115. Assuming mine works, it looks like I did alright.
The BIN price of mine actually scared me off a bit. When I see things like this, one camera with a BIN of $55 and another being bid up over $100, I have to wonder if there is something hiding in the $55 listing that I'm not seeing. Something that's keeping those other buyers bidding on the more expensive camera.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #14
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by rovnguy
I think I bought that 9 from you along with a 7. Both are great cameras and will get a workout this weekend... weather permitting.
didn't i sell those to you?
sold you something...

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-26-2007   #15
sepiareverb
genius and moron
 
sepiareverb's Avatar
 
sepiareverb is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: NEK
Posts: 7,113
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley
the minolta 7s2 is not big and clunky...the 7s is though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by filmgoerjuan
I'm guessing you might be thinking of the Hi-Matic 7s, which is big and clunky (like a Yashica GSN). The 7s-II is very small and decidely non-clunky.
Now you guys have me wanting yet another camera!!

I wonder how many different 35mm cameras have been made?
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-28-2007   #16
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Well, the camera was just delivered and so far...I think I'm in trouble.
I dropped in a 675 hearing aid battery (zinc) and the meter doesn't look responsive.
The shutter looks alright and apertures move manually, but it simply shoots wide open when in Auto.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-28-2007   #17
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
I'm going to take off the bottom plate tonight and hope it's a wire.
Not sure what I'll be able to do if it's the CDS cell.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-28-2007   #18
agi
Registered User
 
agi's Avatar
 
agi is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 437
The 7sii is fully manual so you can still use it if the meter isn't working.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-28-2007   #19
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by agi
The 7sii is fully manual so you can still use it if the meter isn't working.
Unfortunately, I'm really wanting an AE camera here.

I just spent an hour trying to get those $%&*$$ screws off of the baseplate. I got one off and managed NOT to strip the others, but they just don't want to come off.
Maybe I can find some better tools at work and try them.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-28-2007   #20
agi
Registered User
 
agi's Avatar
 
agi is offline
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 437
I removed the lens of a 7sii using the tools I purchased at Micro-Tools. I bought a few things but this Precision screwdriver set is so worth the pain of trying to remove the baseplate of cameras. If you have a few cameras and like working on them, it's worth the investment.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-29-2007   #21
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
I picked up a precision screwdriver set (the jewler's set I had wasn't cutting it) and got the baseplate off.
Everything looks good there, so it looks like maybe the CDS sensor is dead.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-30-2007   #22
dazedgonebye
Registered User
 
dazedgonebye's Avatar
 
dazedgonebye is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Arizona
Age: 51
Posts: 4,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whisper
Are you sure the contacts are clean?
Also be sure they are hitting the battery in the right place.
Yes. It really looks clean in there. The wires are firmly attached and the solder job looks good.
I was concerned about the battery, so I tried a few things with tin-foil to be sure I had contact and still no results.
I have someone willing to take a look at it, so it may have a future. Otherwise, it's just another in the long line of lessons I should learn about buying old cameras off of the bay. It's such a crap shoot.
__________________
Steve

"And I know now that the cure for my childhood was not to be looked after, as I once believed; it was to look after someone else." ~Philip Norman

Photography Blog
Flickr
Twitter
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-08-2007   #23
Mikael.N
Registered User
 
Mikael.N's Avatar
 
Mikael.N is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Sweden Lulea
Posts: 75
when you turn the aperture ring to auto it is a small contact that turn on the power.check so it is god contct
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best deal on new S3 2000? x-ray Nikon RF 64 02-23-2009 23:54
Epson 4490/ Minolta DSIV comparison aad Scanners / Scanner Software 32 02-16-2006 00:04
OT & FID Warning: Fuji Offers Good News, Bad News bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 40 01-31-2006 14:08
Good experiences at labs and shops sf Rangefinder Photography Discussion 6 12-02-2005 13:19
The Good, The Bad and the Expensive Fred Leica M Film Cameras 7 06-16-2005 15:41



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:38.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.