Winogrand

Ash · 03-25-2007

http://photo-muse.blogspot.com/2007/...ork-movie.html

In case some of you hadn't caught it yet

....that's a leica M in his hand, right?

Xmas · 03-25-2007

Ash

A hand on his M4

http://cameraquest.com/LeicaM4G.htm

Noel

Michael I. · 03-25-2007

I love his body of work

Nigel Meaby · 03-25-2007

Thanks for that Ash. He's always been Top "Street" Dog in my eyes!

ChrisN · 03-25-2007

That was worth watching. I'm fascinated by his mannerisms - he had this neat trick of bringing the camera up to his eye and instantly snapping the shot, then whipping the camera up and away as if he had changed his mind about taking the shot.

RayPA · 03-25-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChrisN

That was worth watching. I'm fascinated by his mannerisms - he had this neat trick of bringing the camera up to his eye and instantly snapping the shot, then whipping the camera up and away as if he had changed his mind about taking the shot.

I read a Meyerowitz interview (I think in Winogrand's Figments ' ) book, and he described that mannerism, so it was neat to see. Also of note, he's left-eyed.

.

fishtek · 03-25-2007

He's probably the quintessential street shooter....but...I think that a photograph can be narrative.

Subject for a deep psych thread?

Regards!
Don

pesphoto · 03-25-2007

Thanks for that link Ash. Ive never seen him at work or heard him speak before. Anyone else notice he doesnt seem to have a camera strap?

morgan · 03-25-2007

Thanks for posting that, it was great to see. I love his work, and seeing him in action is inspiring. It appears almost effortless to him. Also, I've never wanted an M so badly. It's practically invisible in his hand.

pcfranchina · 03-25-2007

WOW! Now thats street shooting. Talk about quick with the camera. Anyone know anything about his technique?

RayPA · 03-25-2007

Ash, you're my hero. Thanks for finding and posting this!

edit: linked it to my blog too.
.

Todd.Hanz · 03-25-2007

Excellent! Excellent!

He was a god, I like his philosophy, so much more humble than alot of the modern day ilk.

Todd

MikeL · 03-25-2007

He sure took some interesting photos with a pre-asph canon lens.

His book 'The Animals' has always made me chuckle and smile.

f8&go · 03-25-2007

Ash,

Thanks for the link. Loved it!

MadMan2k · 03-25-2007

Very interesting video, really cool to see how he worked while shooting.

telenous · 03-25-2007

Thanks Ash, great video. I saw it with my girlfriend the other day (somebody posted a different link to the same video) and we both chuckled when we saw his mannerism. You could see though it worked, he took a few photos of crossing pedestrians point blank, and they weren't sure, they were looking at each other in disbelief ('What the?...did he? didn't he?').

The way he took photos also explains his choice of wide-angle lens. Hyperfocal at f11-16 under the strong Californian sunlight, and shooting at close range. It made me wonder if I need a 28mm lens after all. (why does everything have to lead to GAS

)

I also liked him a lot as a person, he seemed easygoing and fun ('mad scientist' is what my girlfriend said he looked like) and his commentary on his own work was very interesting, but this was a person who obviously preferred to do photography rather than talk about it. His behaviourist philosophy about photos capturing the surface of reality, (which, according to him, is all there is to it) or about them not having a narrative but only a straightforward descriptive, ostentive function was also very revealing about the man. And the bit I agree most with him is that you really cannot outdo the theatricality that people provide for you in their everyday lives.

It was certainly educational, even a little rivetting to watch him at work - and I can tell you, the day I watched it, I went out to shoot with a slightly different mentality.

aizan · 03-25-2007

i think he would have liked the hexar rf.

photogdave · 03-26-2007

I think he would probably have liked a high end digi point and shoot. He probably would have disliked RFF!

HansDerHase · 03-26-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by photogdave

I think he would probably have liked a high end digi point and shoot

Seeing the pace of his action I suspect he would'nt have liked shutterlag

BTW: Seeing him jerking around his camera I think all deep and complex theories about Garrys camera tilt are now obsolete. It just happened. He wants to look like he's just playing around - not beeing serious.

Of course later when editing his pictures I'm sure he considered the right amount of tilt, for it is essential for the picture to "grow legs".

...ah yes and... THANKS ASH !!! *bow*

I wonder if it's possible to cature the video, keeping it safe? Anyone knows?

doitashimash1te · 03-26-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by HansDerHase

I wonder if it's possible to cature the video, keeping it safe? Anyone knows?

Sure, no problem. After registering on vimeo.com you can download the video. I did that and now I have it on my iPod. Its audio i one-channel only, I think I'll fix that because the lack of sound in my right ear is a bit annoying.

And yes: Ash, thanks a LOT! Great find indeed!!!

Ash · 03-26-2007

Don't thank me, thank the guy who owns the blog. He's a member on LFPF, so I stole the link from his post about it.

Thought you all might like it.

In all honesty when I'm shooting, I shoot a lot like winogrand, but with less chatter about it. Often focus and take the shot or move the camera to some angle (but not so tilted.. well except for Gun Shop shot!) to catch people without them reacting.

But hey, Wino is the hero, I'm just Ash

amateriat · 03-26-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ash

Don't thank me, thank the guy who owns the blog. He's a member on LFPF, so I stole the link from his post about it.

Nonetheless, you still rock for cluing us all in over here. Thanks very much.

- Barrett

Biggles · 03-26-2007

Quote:

Originally Posted by amateriat

...you still rock for cluing us all in over here. Thanks very much.

What the man with the eyeglasses said.

Nigel Meaby · 03-26-2007

"Anyone else notice he doesnt seem to have a camera strap?"
Aha, I watched it again after reading your comment and you are partly right. The first time we see him out on the street he has an M4 with a thin brown leather strap around his neck, which I didn't notice first time around. When we see him out on the street the second time he must be using another M4 as it does indeed not have a strap. all the same his "camera action" is pretty fluid.

willie_901 · 03-26-2007

I too found this video fascinating. I decided the external 28mm finder really helped him be quick.

I also liked the sort of crazy answer he gave ("Just trying to survive") to somebody who challenged him ("What's up? What's up?). This strategy is brilliant (unless the questioner is with law enforcement).

willie