Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Actions speak louder than words
Old 03-24-2007   #1
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
Actions speak louder than words

Into my pocket went my DSLR money and out the door I went. I have been looking a little bit more seriously this past week or so, I have a discount offer from Circuit City and printed their online prices which very competitive to start with, just in case the in store prices aren't the same.

My son met a bunch of kids for a play group thingy and then he was meeting his bestest friend at an indoor play-scape fun place. Colin's mom was going to watch the boys so I had a few hours of free time. I also had a couple camera bags in the trunk. I was tired and didn't take them out of the car yesterday. I stopped for a quick lunch, and then shopping I was going to go.

But then I remembered, the St Patrick's Day parade was postponed until today, and I had film in two cameras that I wanted to finish up. Lunch wasn't that great and I needed a pick me up.

Well, I finished the two rolls and most of a third. AFGA 400 was in the Himatic, HP5 in the M6. I loaded some Arista 100 in the M6 for the walk back to my car. I don't think I made any great photos today, but it felt good to go and do some shooting.

I got back to pick up the boy just in time as things were winding down. He had a good day too.

Oh, I did get close to the Circuit City, just across the street, picked up a couple Star Wars toys at Target on the way home, something to play with, but not for me.

My "new" toy was waiting for me when I got home, a nice little Canonet QL17 GIII. The Himatic may be in trouble, I really liked my first Canonet. And my DSLR money went back to its hiding place.

Maybe some other day, but I think I showed my true colors today. I really really like my RF cameras. And processing those three rolls of film this morning, and having the need to do three more tomorrow is pretty satisfying too. There is always tomorrow for digital, but I will stay with my film for now.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #2
amateriat
We're all light!
 
amateriat's Avatar
 
amateriat is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 57
Posts: 4,638
Funny how things wind up, isn't it?


- Barrett
__________________

"Print 'em both, kid." -
Frank "Cancie" Cancellare, to a UPI courier, after tossing a 20-exposure roll of film to him.

Here, a Gallery.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #3
FrankS
Registered User
 
FrankS's Avatar
 
FrankS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Great White North
Age: 56
Posts: 17,159
Digital will only get better and cheaper. No need to rush!
__________________
“Believe nothing, no matter where you read it or who has said it, not even if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense.” – quote
I myself am made entirely of faults, stitched together with good intentions. -quote
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #4
fraley
Beware of Claws
 
fraley's Avatar
 
fraley is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 850
Good story. I share your ambivalence! There's a grass-is-greener syndrome when considering digital results. I know rationally that nothing is perfect. I enjoy using film. At some point I'll use digital too. It won't cure all my photo problems. It will provide some advantages over film no doubt, and something will be lost too. I think I will always want to use film. It should be an and/and situation, not an either/or.
__________________
My Gallery

Poem-O-Rama
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #5
mike goldberg
The Peaceful Pacific
 
mike goldberg's Avatar
 
mike goldberg is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Jerusalem [Bostonian]
Posts: 1,093
Thumbs up

Would you believe it? Four months ago, I was quite busy over at
DSLRx, and all set to buy a 350D for far too much money.
It did not feel quite right in my hands.
I could not see myself holding a little button with my
right thumb... and fiddling with a little wheel with my index finger,
for 7 variable focus points. Menus, sub-menus, electronics... yikes!

Now, I'm lucky in that I have an RFF buddy close to home, whom I know
from my SLR days. Both Ruben and I have the 'souls of collectors' ...
talk about GAS!

Well, with two Bessa's, a couple of J8's, 2 CV lenses, and a Kiev... here I am.
I thought I was 'done' for a while. On Friday, I had Ruben's beautiful,
near mint FED-2 in hand, and here I am, window shopping again

And, mirable dictu, I'll be developing my own B/W soon...
a first in 12 years! Do actions speak louder than words? You betcha!
What is important here; it feels like I've found myself, so to
speak. It feels good and right to have a direction and to be on my path.

Thanks for listening.
mike
__________________
We find our Destiny on the road we take to avoid it.
~ Carl Jung


Mikes Faves:

http://www.flickriver.com/photos/mik...7622599834937/
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #6
Dfin
Registered User
 
Dfin's Avatar
 
Dfin is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 285
Stray not on the dark side,Keep the Faith Brother, Keep the Faith.
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-24-2007   #7
Gid
Registered User
 
Gid's Avatar
 
Gid is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 1,539
I've said several times before, if it wasn't for the time issue ...............

I was looking at some film shots this weekend, taken over the last year, and there is an edge to film (B&W) that you don't quite get with digital - maybe dynamic range is a factor. Also looked at some Provia 400 shots and the colour is great. This is not a film is better than digital position, just observation.

However, looking back with fondness is not the same as being in the middle of a dozen undeveloped and/or unscanned rolls
__________________
My Gallery

My Top Ten

Gid
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #8
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
I think if I was heading off on a vacation or had a pressing need for a digital camera I would have done it. The last 2 years I have come home with 20ish rolls of film from vacation, so that is a big bang in processing costs when more than half are color. But the pressing need isn't imminent.

I don't think I am ambivolent as much as I like what I have. No need to fix something that isn't broken.

Will prices come down? I don't know, there may be a little more settling, but I think the price points are being established, sub $1000, sub $1500, Nikon and others in the $600 range with a basic body, kind of like a fancy P&S that you can change lenses on. And then of course the more advanced models. I don't know how much the price levels will change opposed to evolutionary advances in technology now at the existing price points.

Still, what I have is fine for me, more than fine, it is fun.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #9
cbass
Nutmegger
 
cbass's Avatar
 
cbass is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 479
Rover, I've bought two digital cameras (including my DSLR) at Circuit City and in both purchases the experience was pretty good for a big-box retailer. My only complaint is that C.C. typically does not stock many lenses or accessories. Your store may differ.

For the record I hold a neutral position in the boorish film v. digital argument. However, my good old Pentax *ist DL with the SMC-FA 50/1.4 makes a fast, compact kit that has completely replaced my Bessa R & CV 75/2.5 (both since sold). I've attached a few available light grab shots made with this setup. For family shooting the DSLR rules supreme in our house. These days I only use my RF for landscapes & travel.

Good luck with your purchase, Rover!

Side note: We were actually in Hartford yesterday but we missed the parade. You certainly had a beautiful day for it. I had my pocket digicam with me but we spent the enire day with a realtor, looking at houses. I'm starting a new job there in mid-May. The RF scene in the Nutmeg State will soon be adding another member .
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Trish Couch-rs.jpg (123.6 KB, 58 views)
File Type: jpg Buddy Portrait-rs.jpg (104.7 KB, 38 views)
__________________
Chris

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #10
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
Where is the new Job? Send me a PM or email. Since technically if my Co was in RI we would have been competitors, I would be interested to see where you are going. Perhaps I know some folks you will be dealing with.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #11
fraley
Beware of Claws
 
fraley's Avatar
 
fraley is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 850
I didn't mean to paint you with my ambivalent brush , Rover I guess I just want that next film camera more than that first digital. Although I keep coming back to the Sony Alpha. It places well in reviews. What Chris said is a factor for me too, buying from a consumer store means less selection of lenses. I'd probably want a fixed lens or two rather than the kit zoom.
__________________
My Gallery

Poem-O-Rama
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #12
Joe Mondello
Resu Deretsiger
 
Joe Mondello's Avatar
 
Joe Mondello is offline
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Manhattan
Age: 62
Posts: 583
I shot with my Nikon D200 recently after an unintended hiatus. The hiatus was caused by my acquisition of a Canon G7 and then an Epson R-D1 and a brief fling with an M8.

More and more I find the R-D1 to be the camera I want to have with me. I picked up a clean, used Billingham Small Hadley at B&H for half price and it holds the R-D1 and it my lenses and spare battery quite nicely.

I *need* the D200 for event shooting and love it's long and close capabilities and the wild variety of lenses, but I just haven't *bonded* with any camera like I have with the R-D1 in a long long long time (my 50s-era M3 is the last camera that gave me that feeling at it is long gone).
__________________
--
Cheers,
Joe

40mm Nokton 1.4, 28mm Ultron 1.9, 15mm Super Wide Heliar Asph 4.5, 75mm Color Heliar 2.5, 1963 50mm Summicron DR 2.0, 35mm Summaron 3.5 with eyes, 1931 Leica I(c) Standard w/ 50mm 3.5 Elmar, I miss my stolen double stroke M3
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #13
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by fraley
I didn't mean to paint you with my ambivalent brush , Rover I guess I just want that next film camera more than that first digital. Although I keep coming back to the Sony Alpha. It places well in reviews. What Chris said is a factor for me too, buying from a consumer store means less selection of lenses. I'd probably want a fixed lens or two rather than the kit zoom.

No problem, I started last week ambivalent actually but ended up content.

The R-D1 is a thought, no need for new lenses. I don't know, but the film I processed this morning looks good. I have to get more APX 400, every time I take it out of the Diafine I am surprised at how good it looks as negatives.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 03-25-2007   #14
Gid
Registered User
 
Gid's Avatar
 
Gid is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northamptonshire, UK
Posts: 1,539
All this talk of film .........................

This afternoon I went out for a dog walk a took my Canon F1 with 100mm 2.8 and finished off a roll of HP5+. Now, I've got a roll of Provia 400 that needs to be used ...................

It is quite nice to come back to manual everything even if it is an SLR. However, I will send the roll to the lab I use and get 6x4 prints made - if I want to post anything on the web I'll scan the 6x4.
__________________
My Gallery

My Top Ten

Gid
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #15
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
UPDATE: A week later

Well, I really don't want to feed another camera system. A DSLR is an amazing tool and the right camera, but I don't need one.

I did the most un RFF thing related to GAS I could do, but it was hard. I will at some point soon get a nice high quality Digi P&S. Canon G7, Panasonic FZ8, Fugi something, we shall see. Making this decision off to ebay I went, an M2 in mind. Luckily none were readily available immediately, and although I WANT an M2..... I need another camera like I need an extra hole in my head.

So what non RFF GAS thing did I do? I bought airline tickets. I will pack up my family, M6, some lenses and film, that yet to be determined digi cam, go on vacation and make some pictures.

How about them apples?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #16
Rhoyle
Registered User
 
Rhoyle is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 284
When you've already got a good kit, plane tickets are infinitely more valuable than a new gadget. Is it better to own yet another new thing, or to create fabulous opportunities to use what you have?

As far as the DSLR thing is concerned, I want one as well, but it'll probably be quite some time before I get one. The reason is that I, or just as importantly, we as a group shoot what we do because we enjoy the process. DSLR's offer excellent performance and all you have to do is push some buttons. They are convenient, quick and easy. If we all wanted quick and easy, there would be no rangefinder forum. So we take our time and are in control of our results.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #17
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,691
Quote:
Originally Posted by rover
UPDATE: A week later

Well, I really don't want to feed another camera system. A DSLR is an amazing tool and the right camera, but I don't need one.

I did the most un RFF thing related to GAS I could do, but it was hard. I will at some point soon get a nice high quality Digi P&S. Canon G7, Panasonic FZ8, Fugi something, we shall see. Making this decision off to ebay I went, an M2 in mind. Luckily none were readily available immediately, and although I WANT an M2..... I need another camera like I need an extra hole in my head.

So what non RFF GAS thing did I do? I bought airline tickets. I will pack up my family, M6, some lenses and film, that yet to be determined digi cam, go on vacation and make some pictures.

How about them apples?
i admire your discipline, discipline which i completely lack!!
my budget is pretty limited and i jealously keep my camera money seperate and use it for for only gear or film etc.
i have a few bucks in my paypal account now (where the camera budget hides) and it's like a slow burn in my pant's pocket.
i have been making lists, starting threads and looking at internet articles for a few days now and still can't decide.
get an r4m and have a body for each lens?
get a cv 15 for that really wide experience and a bunch of film?
finally get another cle?
sell the 90 and just use the 100 on the om2 if i need?

anyway, where will the tickets take you?

joe
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #18
sooner
Registered User
 
sooner is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
I recently bought my first dSLR, a Pentax k100D and have to admit I love it, especially for the low light color shots and versatility. But it is too plastic and missing for me is the organic connection that exists for most of us with film. Yesterday we took a daytrip and I took an Oly XA with Scala, a Fuji GA645 with Provia 100, and the Pentax digital. We kind of got rained out, but at least I was prepared! But I agree, always spend money on travel over equipment.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1354'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #19
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,860
Washington DC for the 4th of July week Joe.

I still have GAS, but I put priorities first, and before I changed my mind, when my wife said she found a good rate for the tickets I clicked the buy button. The money is gone now, so no looking back.

Joe, which Panasonic do you have? FZ50?
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #20
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,691
the fz 20.

it's a great camera with a veeeery long zoom.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #21
Todd.Hanz
Registered User
 
Todd.Hanz's Avatar
 
Todd.Hanz is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Texas
Age: 48
Posts: 4,966
I just read this and had a similar experience.

I had a few "hundies" set aside for a D200 and 80-200 zoom for my kids upcoming summer sports leagues...instead I bought a black paint MP. So much for any sports related college scholarships, there's always academics

Todd
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #22
rpsawin
RF Enthusiast
 
rpsawin's Avatar
 
rpsawin is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,423
I bought a D200 around Thnaksgiving and used it until March. I sold it 2 weeks ago. For what I want out of digital imaging the D200 is overkill (a wonderful camera that has a distinct non-dslr feel to it). I;m very satified with my rf's & mf gear. I'm using a LC1 for digital and it is an excellent fit for my needs.

Bob
__________________
Best regards,

Bob
CEO-CFO-EIEIO, Ret.
  Reply With Quote

Old 04-01-2007   #23
dnemoc
Registered User
 
dnemoc is offline
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Currently in Champaign, Illinois
Posts: 105
I love Frank's comment... precisely the words to fit here
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hist of photography in 3 words GeneW Rangefinder Photography Discussion 49 11-06-2006 10:03
words of wisdom FrankS Off Topic 3 06-12-2006 13:58



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:04.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.