Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Return my 35 Summicron M ASPH?
Old 02-13-2007   #1
Berliner
Registered User
 
Berliner is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ...the friendly skys...
Posts: 270
Return my 35 Summicron M ASPH?

I got this from KEH last week. It was EX+ condition. However, when I look at the front of the lens. It appears that there is a 'secondary' aperture blade 'stuck' open-in the widest position , in front of the actual aperture. It looks like I can see the points of this secondary aperture from the front of the lens. They do not show from the lens mount side, so they are not intruding on the image area, and the aperture clicks thru every stop accurately. Has anyone seen this before? Is it normal, or should I exchange it? Does anyone have a picture to post of the front of the 35 Summicron M ASPH?
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1619'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #2
OdDbaLL
Registered User
 
OdDbaLL is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: London
Posts: 59
I think I know what you are referring to. I bought mine new and its supposed to look like that, but post a picture if you can.
__________________
In Love with a Rainy Day Woman
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #3
Berliner
Registered User
 
Berliner is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ...the friendly skys...
Posts: 270
Thanks Oddball. I wish I could post a picture. I am on a biz trip with no access to a digicam. With the lens set on any aperture, these 'points' 'circle' the rim of the actual aperture--looking from the front. I think I have seen this in pictures of the lens I have seen online, but it is so hard to tell from an online picture.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1619'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #4
furcafe
Registered User
 
furcafe's Avatar
 
furcafe is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Washington, DC, USA
Age: 46
Posts: 3,846
It's just part of the diaphragm mechanism. Perfectly normal.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Berliner
Thanks Oddball. I wish I could post a picture. I am on a biz trip with no access to a digicam. With the lens set on any aperture, these 'points' 'circle' the rim of the actual aperture--looking from the front. I think I have seen this in pictures of the lens I have seen online, but it is so hard to tell from an online picture.
__________________
Five a Second. Chicago's Bell & Howell Co. (cameras) announced that it would put on sale this fall the world's most expensive still camera. Its "Foton" will take five 35-mm. pictures a second, sell for $700. Bell & Howell, which has found that "families of both low and high incomes now spend over $550" for movie equipment, hopes to sell 20,000 Fotons a year.

--Facts And Figures, Time magazine, Monday, October 4, 1948
My Photoblog

My Flickr stream

My RFF Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #5
RdEoSg
Easily Amused One
 
RdEoSg's Avatar
 
RdEoSg is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Southern California
Age: 33
Posts: 737
Quote:
Originally Posted by furcafe
It's just part of the diaphragm mechanism. Perfectly normal.
Yep. Mine has it as well.
__________________
-Chris-

www.monochromemuse.com

Leica M6 with a 35mm Summicron ASPH, Voigtlander 15, and Canon 90mm. Hasselblad 503CW with 80mm CFE and 120mm Makro-Planar CF. Canon 5D with assorted lenses.

"The Canon might appeal to your inner geek while the Leica might give you a taste for absinthe and a longing to cut off one of your ears." -- Gordon Webster at photo.net
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #6
Tim Walker
Tim Walker
 
Tim Walker is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fayetteville, Arkansas
Age: 47
Posts: 8
My 35 cron ASPH is like that, too, and I've wondered that myself. Glad to hear it seems to be normal. Mine certainly shoots normally and the images look good.
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #7
Berliner
Registered User
 
Berliner is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: ...the friendly skys...
Posts: 270
Great! I was starting to get concerned. Thanks for clearing this up everyone...
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1619'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 02-13-2007   #8
x-ray
Registered User
 
x-ray's Avatar
 
x-ray is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN USA
Age: 64
Posts: 2,101
My new one looks like that too.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
35 Biogon size compared to asph Summilux 50 and v4 35 Summicron x-ray Leica M Film Cameras 54 04-14-2007 15:23
M7+ 35 + 75 combo. Need your advise Alex Krasotkin Leica M Film Cameras 66 04-10-2007 06:19
35 Summicron M ASPH Berliner Leica M Film Cameras 1 02-13-2007 14:44
35 Summicron 4th version vs 35 Summilux pre-ASPH? Bosk Leica M Film Cameras 37 10-17-2006 09:31
35 f2 ZM vs v4 35 Summicron question ? x-ray Zeiss Ikon ZM 17 09-29-2006 07:52



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.