| Nikon RF This forum is dedicated to Nikon Rangefinders: the Nikon One, Nikon M, Nikon S, Nikon S2, Nikon SP, Nikon S3, Nikon S4, and Nikon S3M, Nikon S3 2000, Nikon SP 2005. |
Main Menu
|
The Forums
|
Cool Links
|
Gallery Links
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Will is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 615
|
Hi Frank,
Thanks for posting the patents.
Have a page on your website listing those patents? I don't seems to be able to find it..
Cheers
Will
__________________
Body: Leica M2
Lense: I-26, I-61L/D, J-8, J-9,
Adapted Lense: Kern 50mm Macro-Switar, Voigtlander Prominent 50mm Nokton, CZO 50/2 Sonnar
For Sale: Canon 7S, Canon 50/0.95, Custom Hood
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
That's interesting. I wonder why Schneider-Kreuznach never built and marketed the 50mm f/1.2 lens in this 1930 patent? There was a need for a fast optic in the era of slow films.
Total production of the Nikkor 1.1 was about 3,000 lenses ... it was an expensive specialty optic mainly for professional photographers whose equipment was bought by their companies.
The book "Nikon Rangefinder Camera" by Robert Rotoloni, says the Nikkor 1.1 was first built and sold in early1956 when Nippon Kogaku was "able to produce a lens that would have been impossible just a year earlier. Due to advances in surface coatings and glass technology that allowed for split elements and air spacing, February 1956 saw the introduction of the super fast 50mm f1.1 Nikkor-N."
It sounds as though manufacturers needed to develop new skills, expertise, materials and methods to achieve the ideas presented in the 1930 patent.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
Last edited by VinceC : 01-03-2007 at 11:38.
|
|
|
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
Nikon's company history says the development of the 5cm/1.1 lens required newly developed Lanthanum glass ...
A "key design feature of the 5cm f/1.1 lens was the use of a newly developed type of optical glass made with the rare-earth element lanthanum (La) in three (3) convex (positive) lenses. This provided significant improvements in spherical aberration, curvature of field, sharpness, and image flatness."
They say it's a Gauss type, based on the Sonnar.
The article is posted at:
http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/port...kkor/n07_e.htm
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
Why Schneider-Kreuznach didn't make it 1930?
Probably cost. A.W. Tronnier's son (who is over 80) wrote me his father as a young engineer was forced by his boss (after successfully launching the f/2 Xenon) to develop a f/1.5 lens with only 6 elements, which (no wonder) turned out as bad performer and quite never sold. Maybe it was prior, or after this patent.
In summary Schneider-K. was probably the most innovative optical firm of the 1930's. Remember they licensed Leitz to build their 7-elements f/1.5 Xenon (Summarit after the war)
Technically there were at least two 'cons in the 30's: No coating technique and not available high-refractive glass(three of the Nikkor-N lenses were made of glass with an refractive index=1.71, whereas Tronnier couldn't use higher glass than with 1.6525)
..Whereas in the 50's there was high refractive Lanthan glass available in general. So the real question is, why didn't made it in the 1950's ??
Not Schneider-Kr. who hadn't lens designers skilled enough after Tronnier had changed to Voigtlaender (where he designed the Apo-Lanthar; of course build with Lanthan-glass 1950)
What happend later is well-known: Zeiss-Ikon overtook Voigtlaender and throttled their development in favor of their own Contarex system, and lenses.
For the next 15 years they continued telling their customers, especially in Germany - how fast a lens had to be and how it should look like - until they had enough and bought Japanese cameras.
Tronnier even developed an 0.87/76mm lens with excellent correction and capable of 75l/mm wide open as a freelancer for an American company looking like this:

|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Will is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 615
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sonnar2
Why Schneider-Kreuznach didn't make it 1930?
Probably cost. A.W. Tronnier's son (who is over 80) wrote me his father as a young engineer was forced by his boss (after successfully launching the f/2 Xenon) to develop a f/1.5 lens with only 6 elements, which (no wonder) turned out as bad performer and quite never sold. Maybe it was prior, or after this patent.
In summary Schneider-K. was probably the most innovative optical firm of the 1930's. Remember they licensed Leitz to build their 7-elements f/1.5 Xenon (Summarit after the war)
Technically there were at least two 'cons in the 30's: No coating technique and not available high-refractive glass(three of the Nikkor-N lenses were made of glass with an refractive index=1.71, whereas Tronnier couldn't use higher glass than with 1.6525)
..Whereas in the 50's there was high refractive Lanthan glass available in general. So the real question is, why didn't made it in the 1950's ??
Not Schneider-Kr. who hadn't lens designers skilled enough after Tronnier had changed to Voigtlaender (where he designed the Apo-Lanthar; of course build with Lanthan-glass 1950)
What happend later is well-known: Zeiss-Ikon overtook Voigtlaender and throttled their development in favor of their own Contarex system, and lenses.
For the next 15 years they continued telling their customers, especially in Germany - how fast a lens had to be and how it should look like - until they had enough and bought Japanese cameras.
Tronnier even developed an 0.87/76mm lens with excellent correction and capable of 75l/mm wide open as a freelancer for an American company looking like this:

|
Frank,
May I suggest you do a page listing Lens patent numbers for future references?
Will
__________________
Body: Leica M2
Lense: I-26, I-61L/D, J-8, J-9,
Adapted Lense: Kern 50mm Macro-Switar, Voigtlander Prominent 50mm Nokton, CZO 50/2 Sonnar
For Sale: Canon 7S, Canon 50/0.95, Custom Hood
|
|
|
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
What marvelous lens designs. Tronnier appears to have been a very talented designer (I was goling to say "gifted" but that doesn't translate as well into German).
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
Last edited by VinceC : 01-03-2007 at 07:05.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
Hej Vince,
"Tronnier's Optisches Rechenbureau" (later in the 50's) in Goettingen for sure has had some mathematically talented people, including its boss... he started at Joseph Schneider ~1926 aged 24 as the first and solely optical engineer... do google "Tronnier Xenon" and you'll find a picture of him at young age on my website
cheers Frank
Last edited by Sonnar2 : 01-03-2007 at 07:31.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
The extremely rare Zunow 5cm 1.1 appears to have been introduced in 1955 or perhaps even earlier. It is also a nine-element design. It was considerably smaller than the Nikkor 5cm 1.1, so it can't be using the exact same formula. The Nikkor 1.1 is something of a monster in size (I'm judging only by photographs -- I've never actually used one). But the Zunow looks like a lens you wouldn't mind keeping attached to the camera all day long.
http://www.cameraquest.com/zunow.htm
http://www.pacificrimcamera.com/pp/zunow/zunow.htm
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
Here is the formular. It's the fastest Sonnar type lens ever build:
Patent: http://www.google.com/patents?vid=USPAT2715354
At least the patent was before the Nikkor-N. Highest refraction glass=1.74. Sleek aberration curves!
Last edited by Sonnar2 : 01-03-2007 at 10:31.
|
|
|
|
 |
Nikkor-N |
 |
01-03-2007
|
#12
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
Nikkor-N
Hi there,
According to Nikon Historical Society Journal number 58(NHS-58 Journal) the Nikkor-N 5cm f1.1 was the product of research by "five of the top optical manufacturers in Japan" as the Japanese government requested that these five companies use all their technical resources to produce an ultra fast lens of "F0.65 or F0.85 lens for use on the Japenese X-ray machines".
The five optical companies were: - Fuji Kogaku
- Konica Kogaku
- Minolta Kogaku
- Nippon Kogaku
- Ohara Kogaku
The main objective of this research was to produce new glass types.
The Nikkor -N 1.1, Fuji 5cm 1.2 and Konica 60mm 1.2 are all products of the Joint venture.
Kiu
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#13
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Age: 55
Posts: 13,865
|
I am really feeling great to have a Nikkor 50mm/1.1 on loan from Kiu!
raid
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
At least from pictures it look as one of the nicest lenses to me ever build...
How much weight and filter size Nikkor-N have, Raid?
What would you guess, is it more a close-focus or a middle-distance lens?
cheers, Frank
Last edited by Sonnar2 : 01-03-2007 at 10:38.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#15
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
15 ounces
62mm filter size
Here is the formula:
Kiu
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Will is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 615
|
Thanks, Frank..
Maybe we should build the list up?
It's 4am in HK, catch you tomorrow..
__________________
Body: Leica M2
Lense: I-26, I-61L/D, J-8, J-9,
Adapted Lense: Kern 50mm Macro-Switar, Voigtlander Prominent 50mm Nokton, CZO 50/2 Sonnar
For Sale: Canon 7S, Canon 50/0.95, Custom Hood
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
It's interesting to me that Nikon and other Japanese manufacturers made their lens formulae public ... The diagrams are widely available on advertisements and brochures from the era. So they were being public about their designs and breakthroughs, not evasive or secretive.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#18
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Age: 55
Posts: 13,865
|
This is all quite interesting information here.
Raid
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
By the way, Raid, everything I've read abou the Nikkor 1.1 says its aperture blades are very fragile. So be gentle when changing f/stops.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#20
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Age: 55
Posts: 13,865
|
Vince: I have been very gentle with all lenses, and Iam done with the testing.
Thanks for the reminder.
Raid
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
Not only the Japanese lens maker published the diagrams, but it looks like some made more effort with patent protection than others. Zeiss has most, LEICA some, Canon less, NIKON and Pentax havn't many patents on lenses. After all you need a lot more information, glass type and stuff, to copy a lens as just diagrams. Even the patent diagrams don't include all information, i.e. hide enlargement of front elements in order to increase edge illumination (less light falloff). 62mm is a good filter size. The Canon has 72mm. Noctilux 1/50 has 60, and light-falloff is quite visible.
Last edited by Sonnar2 : 01-03-2007 at 14:15.
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#22
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
Raid: I really liked seeing your test shots from the 1.1. Those are the only shots I've ever seen taken by the lens, other than a few poorly reproduced images from the 1950s. I looks like a marvelous lens.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Sonnar2 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Germany
Age: 44
Posts: 1,310
|
..but expensive one, at least for people like me! 
|
|
|
|
01-03-2007
|
#24
|
|
Dad Photographer
raid is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Age: 55
Posts: 13,865
|
Vince:I was lucky by making a mistake and getting reasonably sharp images out. I left out the Nikon-Contax adapter. Maybe you experts on the history of lenses can tell me whether the Nikkor 50mm/1.1 was ever built in the Contax mount.
Kiu wants his lenses back, and I don't blame him. I will take another good look at the Nikkor before mailing it to him. :-)
Raid
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-03-2007
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Age: 54
Posts: 1,584
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by VinceC
That's interesting. I wonder why Schneider-Kreuznach never built and marketed the 50mm f/1.2 lens in this 1930 patent? There was a need for a fast optic in the era of slow films.
Total production of the Nikkor 1.1 was about 3,000 lenses ... it was an expensive specialty optic mainly for professional photographers whose equipment was bought by their companies.
The book "Nikon Rangefinder Camera" by Robert Rotoloni, says the Nikkor 1.1 was first built and sold in early1956 when Nippon Kogaku was "able to produce a lens that would have been impossible just a year earlier. Due to advances in surface coatings and glass technology that allowed for split elements and air spacing, February 1956 saw the introduction of the super fast 50mm f1.1 Nikkor-N."
It sounds as though manufacturers needed to develop new skills, expertise, materials and methods to achieve the ideas presented in the 1930 patent.
|
I think the lack of anti-reflective coatings in 1930 was probably another factor. The light losses and internal reflections without them would probably be horrific.
__________________
Leica M2, Contax IIa, Canon VI-L, Nikon S, Rolleiflex 2.8D, and several others
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:16. |
|
|
|