| Nikon RF This forum is dedicated to Nikon Rangefinders: the Nikon One, Nikon M, Nikon S, Nikon S2, Nikon SP, Nikon S3, Nikon S4, and Nikon S3M, Nikon S3 2000, Nikon SP 2005. |
Main Menu
|
The Forums
|
Cool Links
|
Gallery Links
|
|
 |
Nikon Rangefinder forum |
 |
12-23-2006
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
rbsinto is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada Thornhill is a suburb of Toronto
Posts: 532
|
Nikon Rangefinder forum
I'm a brand new member, who just joined about five minutes ago.
I've visited this site a number of times in the last couple of years , because I am interested in rangefinder cameras, but only now decided to register because I got my dream toy exactly one week ago, when I purchased a very nice vintage chrome Nikon S3 complete with a Jupiter 8 50mm f2 lens.
I'll discuss the camera and lens in another post.
The reason I'm posting in the General Discussion section is because I don't know where else to pose my question.
Being a lifelong Nikon vintage SLR and now rangefinder user, I was very surprised to see that there is apparantly no Nikon rangefinder forum here.
The site seems to have given all the other rangefinder manufacterers separate forums, and yet Nikon seems to be left out. Knowing the history of the Nikon series of rangefinders, and their importance in the general history of camera development, I hardly think Nikons omission from the forums was a mere oversight, and I'd be very interested to know why they've been left out.
Truly, except for some questions about the Voigtlander/Cosina Nikon-compatible lenses, a bit of curiosity about Leicas, and the opportunity to slag the accursed Canon Corporation, the other fora are of little interest to me, and a Nikon based forum would be the most important aspect of this site.
I hope I'm not opening old wounds, or stepping on anyone's toes by asking this question, but c'mon guys, where's the Nikon forum? Please and thank you.
Last edited by rbsinto : 12-24-2006 at 06:20.
|
|
|
|
 |
12-23-2006
|
#2
|
|
moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 59
Posts: 25,594
|
i have moved your post to the nikon rf section.

__________________
rd1...28/1.9...35/1.2...50/1.1
(...15/4.5...50...2.8)
rd1...28/3.5...40/2.8...50/2.5
flickr
|
|
|
|
12-23-2006
|
#3
|
|
Bestilux aficionado
telenous is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,141
|
Hello Rbsinto,
Welcome to the forum. There is in fact a Nikon forum - check here:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...splay.php?f=56
When you log in, go to the left side panel and click on 'Forums'. This will take you to another page where there is a list of all the available forums. The Nikon one is somewhere in the middle, in the so-called 'Forum' section, right below the Yashica forum.
Some of the oldest and most experienced members are active in this forum. I have often asked for their lights for Nikkor LTMs. I am sure you 'll find a wealth of information there.
Best,
__________________
- Alkis
flickr
|
|
|
|
12-23-2006
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
dreamsandart is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Japan
Posts: 402
|
It would be easier to see and post on the Nikon Forum if there was a 'Nikon' link in the 'Forums' box on the left side of the RRF opening page.
|
|
|
|
12-24-2006
|
#5
|
|
moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 59
Posts: 25,594
|
i suggest you contact jorge directly for that d&a, as he is the only one who can make those changes.
__________________
rd1...28/1.9...35/1.2...50/1.1
(...15/4.5...50...2.8)
rd1...28/3.5...40/2.8...50/2.5
flickr
|
|
|
|
12-24-2006
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
Welcome!
Nikon RF cameras are like the forum location itself. ... a little off the beaten path, overlooked and underappreciated, even ignored by a Leica-centered world. But once found, it reaps great rewards.
PS, I've also thought it was a little odd that the Nikon forum link vanished during one of the site's redesigns. There's a link to XPan but not Nikon ... Hmmmmm.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
12-26-2006
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
rbsinto is offline
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Thornhill, Ontario, Canada Thornhill is a suburb of Toronto
Posts: 532
|
"....a Leica-centered world." ???????
Perhaps your world, but certainly not mine. I've always considered their cameras to be incredibly over-priced, with the IMPORTANT specifications such as shutter speed accuracy to be no no greater than any other manufacterers. And a"silky smooth" film advance lever was never high on my list of camera priorities. As for the lenses, yes they're very nice, I'm sure, but in the almost 30 years that I've been photographing, I've still not yet met ANYONE who can look at an image and tell what brand of lens it was shot with. So who's kidding who?
I use laughably outdated, horribly underfeatured, clunky old, manual focus Nikons; an F, an F2 and a "space-aged" FA, and fourteen (mostly) Nikkor lenses, and now as well, an S3, and my Leica-less images, and world are just fine.
Last edited by rbsinto : 12-27-2006 at 02:47.
|
|
|
|
 |
12-26-2006
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
I looked through a Leica once. It was okay, I guess.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
12-26-2006
|
#9
|
|
Exposing film since 1969.
SDK is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston, MA
Age: 45
Posts: 405
|
I kinda would like a new SP with a 35mm/1.8 but they are not cheap, even compared to Leicas. There are a lot of us who use Nikon F SLRs and Leica M rangefinders. The best of both are great, and Zeiss is making some nice lenses for both systems now too. Long live choice!
__________________
Trip shutters, not people.
|
|
|
|
12-27-2006
|
#10
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
I think Vince meant a "Leica-centered forum"....and the answere is...Not if I have anything to do with it
Kiu
|
|
|
|
 |
Nikon SP with 35/1.8 |
 |
02-10-2007
|
#11
|
|
Jeffery Smith
Jeffery Smith is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Age: 60
Posts: 40
|
Nikon SP with 35/1.8
I was surprised that Nikon produced this camera after the lagging sales of the Y2K Nikon S3. But, like you, I would be delighted to have one. However, I don't see the possibility of the selling price dropping to within reason.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=184'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
02-10-2007
|
#12
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
You bet they are  At least for the month of Feb. 2007
Where's the picture of the SP you promised us?
Not only you didn't post a new picture, you deleted your old!
Jenni, stick to the Nikon forum and give us exclusive rights to your posts
Kiu
Last edited by NIKON KIU : 02-10-2007 at 09:01.
|
|
|
|
02-10-2007
|
#13
|
|
moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 59
Posts: 25,594
|
not that i want to, but if you like i have access to the button that will eliminate all your posts jenni.
one quick move by these old bones and your history is gone.
you could start fresh, so to speak.
joe
__________________
rd1...28/1.9...35/1.2...50/1.1
(...15/4.5...50...2.8)
rd1...28/3.5...40/2.8...50/2.5
flickr
|
|
|
|
02-10-2007
|
#14
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by back alley
not that i want to, but if you like i have access to the button that will eliminate all your posts jenni.
one quick move by these old bones and your history is gone.
you could start fresh, so to speak.
joe
|
Don't you even tempt her joe
I am well aware of the many many conversations going on around here Jenni, Stick to the Nikon forum and I promise you won't be involved in such heated debates that can result in you attempting to delete yourself!
Most times...it's not worth it!
Just my 2 Pences,
Kiu
|
|
|
|
02-10-2007
|
#15
|
|
moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 59
Posts: 25,594
|
I'm not really sure how to take this, Joe
it was just info.
an extreme action offered but not encouraged.
joe
__________________
rd1...28/1.9...35/1.2...50/1.1
(...15/4.5...50...2.8)
rd1...28/3.5...40/2.8...50/2.5
flickr
|
|
|
|
02-10-2007
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
I agree. Nikon folks, for the most part, are an agreeable bunch. We certainly march to Joe's different drummer. Using a Nikon rangefinder sort of reminds me of a quote that a friend uses as part of her email signature:
"Those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
 |
Zeiss lenses on Nikon RFs |
 |
02-11-2007
|
#17
|
|
Jeffery Smith
Jeffery Smith is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Age: 60
Posts: 40
|
Zeiss lenses on Nikon RFs
I know of several people who regularly use a 50/1.5 Sonnar on a Nikon RF body. My understanding is that the focusing of this mis-match of brands is not accurate. Do any of you use a Zeiss "normal" (50mm) lens on a Nikon body? If so, do you deal with the focus issue by shooting at f/8, etc.?
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=184'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
02-11-2007
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
VinceC is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,766
|
Focus is okay at infinity and gradually gets worse as you focus closer. At closest focus, you need to shoot at f/5.6 or, to be safe, f/8.
I suppose, with some trial and error, you could come up with some tables to figure out how much to adjust the focus by, using the distance scales on the lens.
__________________
Vince
My Gallery
Nikon S2, S3, S3-2000, SP, SP-2005 / Kiev 2a
Biogon 21/4.5; CV 21/4; CV 25/4; CV 85/3.5; the following Nikkors: 2.8cm/3.5; 3.5cm/1.8 (1956 and 2005 versions); 5cm/1.4; 8.5cm/2; 10.5cm/2.5; 13.5cm/3.5
Soviet lenses: Orion 28/6; Jupiter-12 35/2.8; Helios-103 50/1.8; Jupiter-8 50/2
|
|
|
|
02-11-2007
|
#19
|
|
moderator
back alley is online now
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 59
Posts: 25,594
|
vince, i love that quote!
i may have to use it.
joe
__________________
rd1...28/1.9...35/1.2...50/1.1
(...15/4.5...50...2.8)
rd1...28/3.5...40/2.8...50/2.5
flickr
|
|
|
|
 |
Zeiss lenses on Nikon RFs |
 |
02-11-2007
|
#20
|
|
Jeffery Smith
Jeffery Smith is offline
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New Orleans, LA
Age: 60
Posts: 40
|
Zeiss lenses on Nikon RFs
That answers my question. The 50/1.5 Sonnar is nice at wide apertures, but so is the 50/1.4 Nikkor. Makes no sense to use a Sonnar on a Nikon if the Nikkor is already so good.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=184'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
02-11-2007
|
#21
|
|
Registered User
jsuominen is offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Finland
Age: 48
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jeffery Smith
I know of several people who regularly use a 50/1.5 Sonnar on a Nikon RF body. My understanding is that the focusing of this mis-match of brands is not accurate. Do any of you use a Zeiss "normal" (50mm) lens on a Nikon body? If so, do you deal with the focus issue by shooting at f/8, etc.?
|
Jeffery: I don't use Zeiss normal lens on a Nikon, because I have a Contax IIa.  But I have posted a message on page http://www.rangefinderforum.com/foru...t=27288&page=7, which describes the focusing issue.
__________________
Jari
My Gallery is almost empty - but take a look at my flickr photos
S2, Bessa T & R2S, M2 & Minilux, 35RF & 35S & AFM35, XA, Contax IIa & T2
Nikkor-S.C 5cm f/1.4, Mill. 50/1.4, 3.5cm/1.8; Summicron 50/2; CV 25/4, 28/1.9, 35/2.5 PII, 35/1.7, 50/1.5, 50/3.5 S; Rollei Sonnar 40/2.8 HFT; Zeiss-Opton Sonnar 50/1.5 T; Zeiss S-mount Sonnar 50/1.5 T*
|
|
|
|
 |
02-11-2007
|
#22
|
|
Did you say Nippon Kogaku
NIKON KIU is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Washington DC suburbs
Age: 48
Posts: 1,793
|
Quote:
|
I am such a pain. Are people tired of me yet?
|
Are you kidding us, we can't get enough of you
Kiu
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:02. |
|
|
|