| Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history! |
 |
M8 and 1.25 Magnifier |
 |
10-17-2006
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
gurtch is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersy Shore
Posts: 59
|
M8 and 1.25 Magnifier
I don't plan on using lenses longer than 50mm on the M8, but may later add a 75mm. May not need one for portraits though, since the 50mm will be like a 66mm lens. Has anyone tried the 1.25 magnifier on the M8? What frame lines can you see with it attached? I don't really like trying to compose pictures in the very small corners of bright lines, so I was wondering if I could leave the magnifier off when say using 24mm or 28mm, and on when using 35mm and 50mm. If I add a 75mm lens, I can see where the mag would be a big benefit.
Thanks
Dave G
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Bob Parsons is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cambridgeshire, England
Posts: 202
|
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
anselwannab is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 436
|
The magnifier won't work since it doesn't have the right lens formualtion or coatings to make it work with digital cameras. You'll have to wait for the digital verison, which will be twice as expensive.
Does the 1.25 become a 1.6625 (1.25 x 1.33) multiplier?
Sorry, I couldn't help but be a wise guy.
Mark
__________________
My Gallery
Zorki 6 with 50/3.5 Industar
Leitz Minolta CL with 40/2 M-Rokkor
Digital and Film SLRs
Every real Black&White picture has silver lining.
It's not the size of the camera, it's the emotion in the emulsion.
Reality is just a shadow of four-dimensional space-time.
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#4
|
|
My Red Dot Glows For You
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 9,933
|
You know, I tried the 90mm Summicron on the M8, and it was like trying to frame a 135mm lens, maybe a little better.
But I agree, the 1.25x magnifier should make it much much better; the viewfinder of the M8 will become a 0.85 viewfinder. Just like an M2, I believe.
__________________
Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).
My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
gurtch is offline
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersy Shore
Posts: 59
|
Hi Gabrielma: the first M camera I ever had was an M2, and I loved the 35mm & 50mm frame lines. I rarely used the 90mm lens and frames. Yes if the 1.25 would allow seeing the 35mm and 50mm frames, on the M8, that would be great.
Thanks
Dave
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#6
|
|
RFF Sponsoring Member.
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,199
|
I tried it out. 35 mm framelines were easily visible without glasses, maybe just visible with, 135 3.4 apo focussed perfectly with the magnifier on. At a guess I would estimate I would misfocus about 20% of my shots on the 135 without a magnifier.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-17-2006
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
nsng is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Singapore
Posts: 2
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by gurtch
I don't plan on using lenses longer than 50mm on the M8, but may later add a 75mm. May not need one for portraits though, since the 50mm will be like a 66mm lens. Has anyone tried the 1.25 magnifier on the M8? What frame lines can you see with it attached? I don't really like trying to compose pictures in the very small corners of bright lines, so I was wondering if I could leave the magnifier off when say using 24mm or 28mm, and on when using 35mm and 50mm. If I add a 75mm lens, I can see where the mag would be a big benefit.
Thanks
Dave G
|
Hi,
During the launch of the M8 here in Singapore, I tried the 1.25x magnifier in conjunction with my Noctilux. Personally, I feel this is the only way to see and focus accurately with this lens on the M8, especially at f1.0. With the 1.25x, vf becomes 0.85x, close to my M3 at 0.91x. I do not have a 75mm., but have the 90mm. instead. Based on what I have seen, the 1.25x magnifier is a must for the 90mm. In fact, I use this magnifier with my M6 with a 0.72x vf. You will need to remove the magnifier when using 24mm or 28mm.
N.S.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
focusing noctalux |
 |
10-17-2006
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Roger Willco is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 20
|
focusing noctalux
Why is it more difficult to focus a 50mm Noctilux than a 50mm Summicron? Is it just because the DOF is so much narrower at f/1.0 vs f/2.0?
Rog
Will the 1.25 magnifer need 6-bit coding? 
|
|
|
|
10-17-2006
|
#9
|
|
M5 Nut
harmsr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
|
Here was my response from the same thread on the leica camera forum.
I remember Sean being correct. I wear glasses. I can see the 28 lines fine without the magnifier. If you mount the magnifier I can not.
I plan to use my 28 & 35 without the magnifier and will use my magnifier with my 50 & 75 lenses.
Ray
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
dmihajlo is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
|
I tried the M8 with the 1.25x magnifier at Photokina. The 35mm are perfectly visible, and the thumbnail-sized 90mm framelines become somewhat more useful.
What I would like to see is a flip-away 1.5x magnifier, which would bring the viewfinder magnification to 1:1 and would still leave the 50, 75 and 90mm visible.
Flip it upwards when not needed, flip it down when using the 75mm for potraits, shoot with both eyes open (like on the RD1)
Who else would be interesteed in this?
Regards
Dragan
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2007'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#11
|
|
RFF Sponsoring Member.
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,199
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Roger Willco
Why is it more difficult to focus a 50mm Noctilux than a 50mm Summicron? Is it just because the DOF is so much narrower at f/1.0 vs f/2.0?
Rog
Will the 1.25 magnifer need 6-bit coding? 
|
It is not more difficult; it is just that your errors show up that more easily... 
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#12
|
|
R9/DMR . M8 . R-D1
MarcoS is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Verona, Italy
Posts: 82
|
Dragan, that would be great !
I'd love to have a flip 1.5x magnifier for 1:1 vision.
More so a flip 2x magnifier to be used with 50mm, 75mm, 90mm and maybe also 135mm.
I'd loose the time/exposure indication in the viewfinder, but I'd gain higher focus and framing accuracy, which I prefer.
It wouldn't be so difficult to make and I could easily pay more than the Leica 1.25x for such a great accessory.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
lxlim is offline
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 23
|
Yes Dragan. I would like such an accessory for the M8, if I buy the M8 that is.
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
boilerdoc2 is offline
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 477
|
Dragan: A flip up magnifier would be absolutely awesome as an accessory. More magnification the better! Megaperls, are you listening?
Steve
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
10-18-2006
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
dmihajlo is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 19
|
Well.
We could hand in a petition at Solms, so they will hopefully react and show the prototype mounted on the M10 they're announcing at the 2014 Photokina...
Or chain us against Leica's front door an not leave before we get it...
I have discussed this with some Leica people at their Photokina booth, they didn't see the benefit of a 1:1 magnification when using a 75mm lens, "because then you can't see the 28mm framelines (no joke) etc. etc. and why one would want to flip away this thing [...]" etc. etc.
I have discussed this with a specialized optical shop here in Switzerland, they don't see much difficulty in producing such thing (even at a reasonable price), except that you get all the patent bashing from the Leica side as soon as you start selling it...
So, what do we do? Find an NGO with the appropriate funds that pay for development and production, and then give it away for free?
In case some Solms people are reading this:
I would order two of these things right away and would pay in advance if you promise to have it ready before the M9 is out...
In case Megaperl is listening:
Tell me where I can type in my credit card number
...
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=2007'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
 |
10-18-2006
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Phil_Hawkes is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney & Blue Mountains, Australia
Posts: 107
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MarcoS
Dragan, that would be great !
I'd love to have a flip 1.5x magnifier for 1:1 vision.
More so a flip 2x magnifier to be used with 50mm, 75mm, 90mm and maybe also 135mm.
I'd loose the time/exposure indication in the viewfinder, but I'd gain higher focus and framing accuracy, which I prefer.
It wouldn't be so difficult to make and I could easily pay more than the Leica 1.25x for such a great accessory.
|
A question for those who tried the 1.25x maginifier: Can the time/exposure indication in the M8 viewfinder be seen easily with the 1.25x magnifier?
Phil
|
|
|
|
10-18-2006
|
#17
|
|
M5 Nut
harmsr is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 322
|
Phil,
Yes, it can.
Ray
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:19. |
|
|