Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Cosina Voigtlander Bessa

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

40 Nokton vs 35 Summilux
Old 01-09-2005   #1
Huck Finn
Registered User
 
Huck Finn is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,957
40 Nokton vs 35 Summilux

I was looking at the lens design of the Nokton, wondering how they got it to be so small & I noticed that it's almost a dead-ringer for the first pre-Aspherical 35 Summilux (1961). Does anyone have both of these or seen comparison shots with both to see similarities/differences?
__________________
Zeiss Ikon
Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Zeiss 50/1.5 C-Sonnar, Rollei 40/2.8 Sonnar, Voigtlander 28/3.5 Skopar, Voigtlander 75/2.5 Heliar


<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=352'>My Gallery</a>

Last edited by Huck Finn : 01-09-2005 at 09:48.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-09-2005   #2
RML
Just live it.
 
RML's Avatar
 
RML is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Holland or Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Age: 43
Posts: 4,840
I think on CVUG there's a discussion goingon about the 40 Nokton vs the 35 Nokton and 50 Nokton. There might be some interesting information in that thread for you.
__________________
My photo blog

Join the Rangefinder Blog/Site Ring.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-09-2005   #3
Huck Finn
Registered User
 
Huck Finn is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,957
Oops! I left out the key piece of information to my search, which was to find out how Cosina made such a fast lens so small. Well, the Summilux design that they appear to have copied is similarly compact @ 28 mm long. The CV 40 Nokton is a whisker longer @ 29.7 mm.
__________________
Zeiss Ikon
Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Zeiss 50/1.5 C-Sonnar, Rollei 40/2.8 Sonnar, Voigtlander 28/3.5 Skopar, Voigtlander 75/2.5 Heliar


<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=352'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-10-2005   #4
Farandole11
Registered User
 
Farandole11 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1
My impression from the pictures posted on the RD1 website

http://www.shingai.com/r-d1/file/index.html

over the past month or so is that the two lenses have a similar look. The Nokton, however, doesn's seem to suffer from flare, whereas the Summilux looks like it has better glass, and its color rendition looks richer.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=958'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Got to play with an R3a & 40 Nokton... Tim Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 8 12-08-2004 15:39
Voigtlander Nokton 50mm/1.5 Peter Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 8 08-23-2004 06:54
Summicron or Summilux? SolaresLarrave Leica M Film Cameras 12 12-25-2003 21:11



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:59.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.