Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Canon RF

Canon RF For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

canonet GIII QL17 scratching negs?
Old 01-05-2005   #1
nihraguk
GAS Anonymous
 
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
Question canonet GIII QL17 scratching negs?

Just got back a test roll of film from the photo lab, and I've discovered that many of the frames on the negs have vertical scratches (rather straight ones) running down across the entire shot.

here is a sample of the scratches.

does anyone know if:
1) this is definitely caused by the camera?
2) there is any way to remedy this problem?

thanks in advance
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2005   #2
denishr
アナログ侘・寂
 
denishr's Avatar
 
denishr is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Croatia
Posts: 867
If those were scratches from the camera, they would be horizontal, rather than vertical. Something else is at play here. Perhaps lab's fault?

Denis
__________________
アナログ侘・寂
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2005   #3
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,171
Very unlikely to be the camera, I think; most scratches are lengthwise to the film's movement, not crosswise like your scratches. One wonders how they could be made, and what occurs to me is careless handling at the lab.

There is/was a scratch-remover product I've used from Edwal. Kind of an oily stuff that served its purpose by temporarily filling in the scratch grooves while the negative was printed. Nose grease will work too, I've been told!

In the long term, a remedy would be to encourage more care by the lab, by changing to a different lab, or by simply doing your own developing. In doing it yourself, anything bad that happens to the negs is your fault... I don't know about you, but I more readily forgive myself (hard to hold a grudge) than I do the lab!
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-05-2005   #4
nihraguk
GAS Anonymous
 
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
grr. I suspected as much; the lab I normally go to is excellent, but they outsource their black/white developing etc to another lab nearby. This is XP2, so they shouldn't have had to outsource it (and I told them as much to process it C41)... but guess they forgot.

thanks guys
__________________
Leica M3 DS, Bessa R3A, Bessa L, CV 40mm f/1.4 Nokton S.C., CV 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar, CV 21mm f/4 Color-Skopar
Mamiya M645 Pro, Mamiya-Sekor 80mm f/2.8 N
photos on flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #5
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,862
I had a film scratching problem with my Canonet when I first got it, but they were horizontal scratches. Those look like a processing or handling issue.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #6
Pherdinand
5000 & call it a day!
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 36
Posts: 7,073
Most scratches come from the printing stage... They might have developed C-41 but outsourced for printing, maybe? (Did you ask for proof prints?) Next time try to ask for dev-only.

These are definitely NOT camera scratches.
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #7
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
The labs Fault. I have had a bad pressure plate in a Kodak Retina do this, the lines were Horizontal and perfect little straight lines that inscreased/decreased in intensity with film winding. I replaced the pressure plate; problem gone.

So good news: Just yell at the lab, camera should be fine. These marks look like they came from moving in and out of an enlarger's pressure plate.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #8
oftheherd
Registered User
 
oftheherd's Avatar
 
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,302
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Sweeney
The labs Fault. ... These marks look like they came from moving in and out of an enlarger's pressure plate.
My first thought also. Inexcusable. I would take them to task for it. The least they should do is reprint after doing the best they can to remove the scratches. Frankly, they should do more than that.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #9
bmattock
Lord of Broken Toys
 
bmattock's Avatar
 
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
For what it may be worth - I agree with the assessments already given - looks like the lab did it.

I also recommend NOT HAVING the lab make prints, unless you want them for some reason. Personally, I just have my lab process, cut, and sleeve my negs. I scan them, and if I want prints after that, I upload them to www.walmart.com or burn them onto a CD-ROM and take them to a digital kiosk to print.

Since I began using this method, I have no more major problems with scratches - and it saves me a lot of money too.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2005   #10
nihraguk
GAS Anonymous
 
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
the funny thing is that i didn't ask for prints; only develop and scan. I did get one index print, but I suspect that came from the scanner rather than an enlarger.
__________________
Leica M3 DS, Bessa R3A, Bessa L, CV 40mm f/1.4 Nokton S.C., CV 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar, CV 21mm f/4 Color-Skopar
Mamiya M645 Pro, Mamiya-Sekor 80mm f/2.8 N
photos on flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-07-2005   #11
bmattock
Lord of Broken Toys
 
bmattock's Avatar
 
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
Quote:
Originally posted by nihraguk
the funny thing is that i didn't ask for prints; only develop and scan. I did get one index print, but I suspect that came from the scanner rather than an enlarger.
I think the scratching comes from handling - and it doesn't matter (in my humble opinion) if the handling is due to scanning or printing. In fact, I believe that some of the minilab machines use the same device to print and scan - so if you asked for scans, you got the same treatment you'd get if you asked for prints.

Do you have a scanner of your own? If so, I'd consider asking them just to develop, cut, and sleeve the negs. Otherwise, you might want to consider making an investment in a good dedicated film scanner, depending on how the economics of it work out for you. For me, the amount of C-41 processing I have done made it cost-effective for me to buy the Minolta Scan Dual IV - it paid for itself right away in saved scanning/printing costs.

Best Regards,

Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Canonet QL17 vs GIII QL17 Unregistered Other RF 4 06-23-2004 14:03
Canonet QL17 GIII Kris Other RF 28 05-01-2004 04:20



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:39.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.