| Canon RF For classic Leica Screw Mount Canon Rangefinders. |
 |
canonet GIII QL17 scratching negs? |
 |
01-05-2005
|
#1
|
|
GAS Anonymous
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
|
canonet GIII QL17 scratching negs?
Just got back a test roll of film from the photo lab, and I've discovered that many of the frames on the negs have vertical scratches (rather straight ones) running down across the entire shot.
here is a sample of the scratches.
does anyone know if:
1) this is definitely caused by the camera?
2) there is any way to remedy this problem?
thanks in advance
|
|
|
|
01-05-2005
|
#2
|
|
アナログ侘・寂
denishr is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Croatia
Posts: 867
|
If those were scratches from the camera, they would be horizontal, rather than vertical. Something else is at play here. Perhaps lab's fault?
Denis
|
|
|
|
01-05-2005
|
#3
|
|
Moderator
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 9,171
|
Very unlikely to be the camera, I think; most scratches are lengthwise to the film's movement, not crosswise like your scratches. One wonders how they could be made, and what occurs to me is careless handling at the lab.
There is/was a scratch-remover product I've used from Edwal. Kind of an oily stuff that served its purpose by temporarily filling in the scratch grooves while the negative was printed. Nose grease will work too, I've been told!
In the long term, a remedy would be to encourage more care by the lab, by changing to a different lab, or by simply doing your own developing. In doing it yourself, anything bad that happens to the negs is your fault... I don't know about you, but I more readily forgive myself (hard to hold a grudge) than I do the lab!
|
|
|
|
01-05-2005
|
#4
|
|
GAS Anonymous
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
|
grr. I suspected as much; the lab I normally go to is excellent, but they outsource their black/white developing etc to another lab nearby. This is XP2, so they shouldn't have had to outsource it (and I told them as much to process it C41)... but guess they forgot.
thanks guys 
__________________
Leica M3 DS, Bessa R3A, Bessa L, CV 40mm f/1.4 Nokton S.C., CV 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar, CV 21mm f/4 Color-Skopar
Mamiya M645 Pro, Mamiya-Sekor 80mm f/2.8 N
photos on flickr
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#5
|
|
Moderator
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,862
|
I had a film scratching problem with my Canonet when I first got it, but they were horizontal scratches. Those look like a processing or handling issue.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#6
|
|
5000 & call it a day!
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 36
Posts: 7,073
|
Most scratches come from the printing stage... They might have developed C-41 but outsourced for printing, maybe? (Did you ask for proof prints?) Next time try to ask for dev-only.
These are definitely NOT camera scratches.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 15,160
|
The labs Fault. I have had a bad pressure plate in a Kodak Retina do this, the lines were Horizontal and perfect little straight lines that inscreased/decreased in intensity with film winding. I replaced the pressure plate; problem gone.
So good news: Just yell at the lab, camera should be fine. These marks look like they came from moving in and out of an enlarger's pressure plate.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
oftheherd is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 6,302
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Brian Sweeney
The labs Fault. ... These marks look like they came from moving in and out of an enlarger's pressure plate.
|
My first thought also. Inexcusable. I would take them to task for it. The least they should do is reprint after doing the best they can to remove the scratches. Frankly, they should do more than that.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=50'>My Gallery</a>
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#9
|
|
Lord of Broken Toys
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
|
For what it may be worth - I agree with the assessments already given - looks like the lab did it.
I also recommend NOT HAVING the lab make prints, unless you want them for some reason. Personally, I just have my lab process, cut, and sleeve my negs. I scan them, and if I want prints after that, I upload them to www.walmart.com or burn them onto a CD-ROM and take them to a digital kiosk to print.
Since I began using this method, I have no more major problems with scratches - and it saves me a lot of money too.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
|
|
|
|
01-06-2005
|
#10
|
|
GAS Anonymous
nihraguk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 73
|
the funny thing is that i didn't ask for prints; only develop and scan. I did get one index print, but I suspect that came from the scanner rather than an enlarger.
__________________
Leica M3 DS, Bessa R3A, Bessa L, CV 40mm f/1.4 Nokton S.C., CV 75mm f/2.5 Color-Heliar, CV 21mm f/4 Color-Skopar
Mamiya M645 Pro, Mamiya-Sekor 80mm f/2.8 N
photos on flickr
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
01-07-2005
|
#11
|
|
Lord of Broken Toys
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
|
Quote:
Originally posted by nihraguk
the funny thing is that i didn't ask for prints; only develop and scan. I did get one index print, but I suspect that came from the scanner rather than an enlarger.
|
I think the scratching comes from handling - and it doesn't matter (in my humble opinion) if the handling is due to scanning or printing. In fact, I believe that some of the minilab machines use the same device to print and scan - so if you asked for scans, you got the same treatment you'd get if you asked for prints.
Do you have a scanner of your own? If so, I'd consider asking them just to develop, cut, and sleeve the negs. Otherwise, you might want to consider making an investment in a good dedicated film scanner, depending on how the economics of it work out for you. For me, the amount of C-41 processing I have done made it cost-effective for me to buy the Minolta Scan Dual IV - it paid for itself right away in saved scanning/printing costs.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:39. |
|
|