Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M"

Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" Discussions about the Leica M8 /M 8.2 / M9 / M9-P/ M-E / M Monochrom / M10 aka "M": Leica digital M mount rangefinder cameras. Naming the new digital M the "Leica M" is VERY unfortunate as it will only confuse newbies with other Leica M cameras of the the past. Happily there is room for confusion with only the past 59 years of Leica M production ... since Leica introduced the Leica M system in 1953. All Hail for the Leica Marketing Department learning Leica M history!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

More, New M8 Pics
Old 09-06-2006   #1
Mackinaw
Think Different
 
Mackinaw is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: One hour south of the Mackinaw Bridge
Posts: 1,905
More, New M8 Pics

Just saw this on the Leica forum:

http://www.lightmediation.com/blog/i...rique-exclusif
__________________
My fancy-schmancy gallery:

http://snowcountryphotography.com

My RFF Gallery:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...user=1453&sl=m
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #2
plummerl
Registered User
 
plummerl's Avatar
 
plummerl is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Seattle, WA
Age: 61
Posts: 727
With the picture showing a self-timer mode, does this mean that the "Blue Dot" might be the self-timer LED? It is in the same spot as on my Contax G2, albeit a bit on the large (!) size. I suppose a red LED would detract from the Leica Red Dot.
__________________
larry
My RFF Gallery
flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #3
Gabriel M.A.
My Red Dot Glows For You
 
Gabriel M.A.'s Avatar
 
Gabriel M.A. is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Paris, Frons
Posts: 10,104
Interesting that it would have a Single- and Continuous-shooting mode. I wonder what meeting they let that one slip.

The dial does look like the "other" way, just like the M6 TTL and M7.

It does seem to be about 1/4 inch (ok, I don't know my inches, but it's a little) taller than the M7.

Damn this strip-tease!
__________________
Big wig wisdom: "Who the hell wants to hear actors talk?" --Harry Warner, of Warner Bros., 1927

Fellow RFF member: I respect your bandwidth by not posting images larger than 800px on the longest side, and by removing image in a quote.
Together we can combat bandwidth waste (and image scrolling).



My Flickr | (one of) My Portfolio
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #4
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by plummerl
With the picture showing a self-timer mode, does this mean that the "Blue Dot" might be the self-timer LED? It is in the same spot as on my Contax G2, albeit a bit on the large (!) size. I suppose a red LED would detract from the Leica Red Dot.
I doubt Leica will ravage the M body with that extra dot simply for the self-timer functionality. I imagine the self-timer will be in the form of beeps, rather than an indicator light.

Why doesn't Jorge have these photos?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #5
John Camp
Registered User
 
John Camp is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 661
The "puzzle" pictures on the French site seem to suggest there is something to hide on the side of the camera opposite the shutter-speed controls. Yet another site, showing what are thought to be "ideas" or "prototypes" show an LCD panel there. I suspect that there is a simple (non-color) LCD panel, since nothing protrudes above the case in Jorge's photos. That would be a good thing, IMHO; you can get a lot of info for almost no battery cost (although it might detract from the aesthetic purity of the camera.) Jorge's photos now look to me like the camera, all right, but with some details photoshopped out. Well, I guess we'll see in a little more than a week.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #6
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Camp
I suspect that there is a simple (non-color) LCD panel, since nothing protrudes above the case in Jorge's photos.
non-color? Lol... wishful thinking dude....
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #7
ghost
Registered User
 
ghost is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
he means an lcd status panel.

that website looks like the real deal.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #8
ywenz
Registered User
 
ywenz's Avatar
 
ywenz is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,493
I also like the wheel on the back of the M8, ala canon DSLR style.. once you've experienced the wheel, you simply can't go back.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #9
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,209
According to the site there is nothing but a LCD exposure counter under number 9. (the other side of the top)
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #10
AusDLK
Famous Photographer
 
AusDLK's Avatar
 
AusDLK is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 852
These images suggest a rather frightening increase in the depth of the M8. I had read that it was supposed to be 2mm thicker. Now that I see how much 2mm is on the camera it looks like a lot... Hope it is an optical delusion.

Last edited by AusDLK : 09-07-2006 at 13:21.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #11
ghost
Registered User
 
ghost is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
on the upside, it might improve the grip.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #12
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,209
That is what I thought abot the Digilux 2 .What a brick. Now I have gotten used to that my M6 feels a bit thin for optimal gripping.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography

Last edited by jaapv : 09-07-2006 at 01:28.
  Reply With Quote

M8
Old 09-07-2006   #13
rsh
Registered User
 
rsh is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Age: 60
Posts: 22
M8

I think the M8 will feel just fine in the hand. So what if it is thicker or longer or higher. What is most important is that all of us will now have a digital M.
__________________
Richard Stonestreet Hutchison
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #14
John Shriver
Registered User
 
John Shriver is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Arlington, MA, USA
Posts: 1,217
Looks completely consistent with what I saw in the flesh.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #15
Rich Silfver
Batteries Not Included
 
Rich Silfver is offline
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,709
I guess they are revealing one piece a day. Today #9 was revelaled: http://www.lightmediation.com/blog/i...rique-exclusif
__________________
My favorite RF cameras right now:
Leica III (F), Leica M3 and Contax IIIa



.........................
Blog.........................Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #16
AndyPiper
Registered User
 
AndyPiper is offline
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Yep - frame counter where the rewind used to be.

Chubby little baby, isn't she? (Or perhaps we should just say "Rubenesque"?) Not enough to worry me, though.
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #17
ghost
Registered User
 
ghost is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 711
tomorrow is the moment of truth!
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #18
AusDLK
Famous Photographer
 
AusDLK's Avatar
 
AusDLK is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 852
Wouldn't it be swell if the M8 communicated through the hot shoe with the new Tri-Elmar viewfinder so the proper frame line view in the finder would automatically selected when the camera senses the focal length being changed? This could be done but will it?
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #19
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausdlk
Wouldn't it be swell if the M8 communicated through the hot shoe with the new Tri-Elmar viewfinder so the proper frame line view in the finder would automatically selected when the camera senses the focal length being changed? This could be done but will it?
Again I will be trying to start a rumour: there will be an electronically coupled Visoflex 4 which takes R lenses..... It would be a nice thing though
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #20
venchka
Registered User
 
venchka's Avatar
 
venchka is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 67
Posts: 6,095
When will Leica ever get it: shutter speeds beyond a very seconds are very handy. Eh????????? I have owned SLR's with 30 seconds or longer shutter speed since 1975. My EF goes to 30 seconds and I think the Elan 2E does 90 seconds. The M5 on the other hand can only muster 1/2 second. If the M8 pictures are true, it stops at 4 seconds. Damn shame.
__________________
Wayne
Deep in the darkest heart of the East Texas Rain forest.
Quote:
"Leave me alone, I know what I'm doing" K.R.
My Gallery
My Blog-Reborn
FlickrMyBookTwitSpaceFace
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #21
Bob Ross
Registered User
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Bob Ross is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyPiper
Yep - frame counter where the rewind used to be.

Chubby little baby, isn't she? (Or perhaps we should just say "Rubenesque"?) Not enough to worry me, though.
Hi Andy,
Using the flash shoe as a size mark (21mm) I did get 41mm depth or +3mm, but when I checked the length, I got a surprise with 146mm, instead of the 138mm of the M7 (+8mm). If I didn't goof with my calculations, the M8 will rival the M5 in the plus size dept. Since I have used M5s since 1977, I'll be right at home.
Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #22
Bob Ross
Registered User
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Bob Ross is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by ausdlk
Wouldn't it be swell if the M8 communicated through the hot shoe with the new Tri-Elmar viewfinder so the proper frame line view in the finder would automatically selected when the camera senses the focal length being changed? This could be done but will it?
On the rear of the flash shoe there are 7 light spots that look to me to be electronic contacts. I posted a similar speculation about it on the Leica User Forum and got a quick reply that it was a reflection off of a plastic piece by someone who seemed to be sure about it. Very interesting reflections, if that is the case.
Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #23
Bob Ross
Registered User
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Bob Ross is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by venchka
When will Leica ever get it: shutter speeds beyond a very seconds are very handy. Eh????????? I have owned SLR's with 30 seconds or longer shutter speed since 1975. My EF goes to 30 seconds and I think the Elan 2E does 90 seconds. The M5 on the other hand can only muster 1/2 second. If the M8 pictures are true, it stops at 4 seconds. Damn shame.
The M7 will go to 32 seconds in auto mode. I don't have the info on the R9, whose shutter will be used.
The M5 is able to meter in bulb up to 30 seconds, but you have to count elephants to use it
Bob
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #24
jaapv
RFF Sponsoring Member.
 
jaapv's Avatar
 
jaapv is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Hellevoetsluis,Netherlands
Posts: 7,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Ross
On the rear of the flash shoe there are 7 light spots that look to me to be electronic contacts. I posted a similar speculation about it on the Leica User Forum and got a quick reply that it was a reflection off of a plastic piece by someone who seemed to be sure about it. Very interesting reflections, if that is the case.
Bob
I think you are looking at the edge of a milled knob on the back, just below the flash shoe.
__________________
Jaap








jaapvphotography
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-07-2006   #25
Bob Ross
Registered User
 
Bob Ross's Avatar
 
Bob Ross is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaapv
I think you are looking at the edge of a milled knob on the back, just below the flash shoe.
Just like the one that doesn't show in the pictures that Jorge posted
In looking at that rear picture again, I do see a light line at the rear of the flash shoe, right where the pattern shows in the top view. I wonder if it is the "write light" with a plastic lens. Also the circular LCD on the left top does not show up.
My latest guesstimate on the size is 146mm X 88mm X 41mm
Bob
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The M8 needs a film advance lever - but not for film CameraQuest Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 95 12-18-2008 08:03
how to confirm pics of m8? ghost Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 5 09-05-2006 14:31
Leica M8 glykogen Leica M Film Cameras 3 09-01-2006 02:53
Leica M8 - It's official! Mark Norton Digital Leica M8 / M8.2 / M9 / M-E /Mono / M10 aka "M" 22 07-30-2006 23:50
Pics on Old Rangefinder & EOS system? cmc_photo Rangefinder Photography Discussion 11 04-21-2004 21:48



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 15:39.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.