Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Minolta 40 vs. CV 40
Old 08-31-2006   #1
sherm
Registered User
 
sherm is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Minolta 40 vs. CV 40

Been contemplating the purchase of a new 40 to do strictly B&W work. I've researched the 40mm SC from Voigtlander and it appears to have received good reviews on performance. The original Minolta CL lenses.... Rokkor I believe? were also single coated. Can anyone confirm this for me? The lenses for the later CLE model were reported to have been multi-coated and I was looking for clarification.

Secondly, does anyone have an opinion one way or the other for SC versions for black and white? Do they really make that much difference? My choice of films are slower ones primarily Efke 25 & 50 ISO.

Thanks in advance...

Scott
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2006   #2
Flyfisher Tom
Registered User
 
Flyfisher Tom's Avatar
 
Flyfisher Tom is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the river ...
Posts: 1,989
Scott,

That is the rumor, that the CL version is single coated, and the CLE version is multi-coated. But I've not seen any definitive proof confirming that rumor. Both versions of the rokkor-m are excellent.
__________________
regards,

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2006   #3
Flyfisher Tom
Registered User
 
Flyfisher Tom's Avatar
 
Flyfisher Tom is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: on the river ...
Posts: 1,989
Joel Matherson (Paleoboy) of RFF might be able to confirm whether the CLE is multi-coated. He has collected virtually every 40 known to man Might want to shoot him a PM if he doesn't see this thread.
__________________
regards,

Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2006   #4
sherm
Registered User
 
sherm is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 437
Thanks for your help Tom
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2006   #5
kbg32
neo-romanticist
 
kbg32's Avatar
 
kbg32 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York, New York
Posts: 4,132
The 40mm Rokkor for the CLE is definitely multicoated. Not sure about the earlier version for the Leitz/Minolta CL.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-31-2006   #6
sockeyed
Registered User
 
sockeyed's Avatar
 
sockeyed is offline
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Age: 42
Posts: 919
I can't speak to the coatings of the CL Rokkors, but I had a CLE Rokkor. It was a good lens, but I didn't feel it was as good as my CV 40/1.4 SC, so I decided to keep the CV and sold the Rokkor. The Rokkor was very nice and very compact, but he CV is sharper and has a nicer signature, I feel. Just my $0.02.
__________________
Likes: rangefinders, film, pie, Tanqueray & tonic



Sockeyed Photo

Flickr

My Gallery
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What camera did you own before? jaapv Rangefinder Photography Discussion 81 12-04-2010 19:19
Epson 4490/ Minolta DSIV comparison aad Scanners / Scanner Software 32 02-16-2006 00:04
Konica Minolta sees big loss, steps up restructuring bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 26 11-05-2005 10:22
Vivitar ES, Minolta Hi-Matic 7sII and Revue 400 SE Russ Rangefinder Photography Discussion 2 02-03-2005 23:50



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 18:48.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.