Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Bigger than 35 RF's > 120 RF's

120 RF's 120 / 220 format rangefinders including Fuji, Koni-Omega, Mamiya Press, Linhof 6x7/6x9 cameras among others, but excluding the 120 folders and Mamiya 6/7 that have their own forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

HU - RF645 with 3 lens up for a ridiculous amount!
Old 08-23-2006   #1
smudwhisk
Registered User
 
smudwhisk's Avatar
 
smudwhisk is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Birmingham, UK
Posts: 89
HU - RF645 with 3 lens up for a ridiculous amount!

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Bronica-RF645-...QQcmdZViewItem

I would hope there isn't someone mad enough to pay this amount to get the 135mm lens, especially considering the RF645s aren't going that well on ebay-uk at the moment!

In case the sellers sees sense and lowers the price - for those looking later it is on for £2,600 which by my maths makes it over $4,500!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2006   #2
sf
Registered User
 
sf is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,842
wow - that's nearly $5K

Well, the 135 IS one of the rarest lenses ever made, and the RF645 IS a truly divine camera.

Interesting price. If it goes for $5k . . .
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-23-2006   #3
Jon Perry
Registered User
 
Jon Perry's Avatar
 
Jon Perry is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Gillingham, Kent, UK
Posts: 97
Woohoo! I'm sitting on a fortune!
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2006   #4
Ian Murphy
Registered User
 
Ian Murphy is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Age: 50
Posts: 10
I don't think we are sitting on fortunes guys. Someone was recently selling a whole RF645 kit with the 45mm,65mm and 100mm and flash and only got around £700. I reckon the only items in demand are the 135mm and 100mm lenses, and these are only of interest to people who already have an RF645, so mostly don't want to buy another. I don't reckon there is much chance of this seller getting the price he is asking, and he would probably do better splitting the system up, although I am aware the 135mm has probably been calibrated for this camera alone. For my money that is why the 100mm was preferable to the 135 mm for most of us.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-25-2006   #5
jtm
not a moose
 
jtm's Avatar
 
jtm is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian Murphy
... I reckon the only items in demand are the 135mm and 100mm lenses, and these are only of interest to people who already have an RF645, so mostly don't want to buy another. ...
I expect that if I sell mine, I'll sell the body and 65mm lens first, only selling the 45mm and 100mm lenses after I know I won't be stuck with just a body.

It is a nice camera, though. I should use it more....
__________________
- John Morris
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens Columnation jdos2 Repair / Camera Care 5 11-15-2008 22:45
Bronica RF645 100mm vs 135mm?? Turtle 120 RF's 14 06-05-2005 04:49
hello, and two questions about the 7s stet Canon RF 46 04-29-2005 01:41
Adapter thickness vs. focusing accuracy: probably more than you want to know! jlw Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 6 04-20-2005 10:21
Mamiya announces 50mm f/4.5 L Lens for M7 MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 0 07-31-2003 08:34



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:20.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.