Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Range Finders > FSU Former Soviet Union RF

FSU Former Soviet Union RF This forum is for the Former Soviet Union rangefinder cameras, especially the many and various Fed, Zorki, and Kiev.

Main Menu
:
The Forums
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

FSU lenses 'bokeh' comparisson
Old 07-09-2006   #1
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
FSU lenses 'bokeh' comparisson

Hi,

I wanted to compare my lenses regarding bokeh, and I'd like to share the results with you guys.

The model is my beautiful and beloved girlfriend. She was so nice, and had a lot of patience with me...

I compared the lenses I have at the moment: Industar 61 50mm, Jupiter 8 50mm, another Jupiter 8 with terribly scratched front element, and Jupiter 9 85mm.

I will post the 50mm lenses at each f-stop together, and then the 85.

EDIT: Attached photos were replaced with better color ballanced ones (I used manual expsure setting on my scanner).
__________________
Ondrej [on-the-ray]


My current favorite: M6 + CV40 | Also using: CV 15/4.5, CV 28/3.5, CV 28/1.9, Leitz 90/2.8, Canon 50/1.4, J-3 50/1.5
(And some Olympus OM cameras and lenses )
My 10 best @ RFF | My Flickr Gallery | Jupiters rule! on Flickr

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:25.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #2
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Both Jupiter 8s at f2:

J8 @ f2


for the scratched J-8 see attached image.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 19(J8x,f2).jpg (103.4 KB, 340 views)
File Type: jpg 15(J8,f2,0).JPG (122.3 KB, 125 views)

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:35.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #3
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Industar 61, Jupiter 8, and attached is the scratched Jupiter 8 at f2.8

Sorry for different subject distance

I61 @ f2.8


J8 @ f2.8


for the scratched J-8 see attached image.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20(J8x,f2,8).jpg (95.1 KB, 147 views)
File Type: jpg 16(J8,f2,8).JPG (120.1 KB, 108 views)
File Type: jpg 12(I61,f2,8).JPG (112.9 KB, 107 views)

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:37.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #4
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Industar 61, Jupiter 8, scratched Jupiter 8 at f4

Again, sorry for different subject distance.

I61 @ F4


J8 @ f4
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 21(J8x,f4).jpg (98.6 KB, 140 views)
File Type: jpg 17(J8,f4).JPG (129.7 KB, 105 views)
File Type: jpg 13(I61,f4,0).JPG (126.9 KB, 109 views)

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:39.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #5
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Industar 61, Jupiter 8 at f5.6

And sorry for the different subject distance...

I61 @ f5.6


J8 @ f5.6
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 18(J8,f5,6).JPG (138.9 KB, 106 views)
File Type: jpg 14(I61,f5,6).JPG (128.9 KB, 106 views)

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:41.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #6
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Now the Jupiter 9:

Set 1
@ f2 (seems incrrectly focussed)

and @ f4



Set 2
@ f2 (again, seems incrrectly focussed)

and @ f4
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 08(J9,f2).JPG (114.9 KB, 105 views)
File Type: jpg 09(J9,f4).JPG (119.5 KB, 106 views)
File Type: jpg 11(J9,f2).JPG (107.3 KB, 103 views)

Last edited by Spyderman : 02-24-2007 at 06:47.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #7
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
PS: I especially like the scratched J8 at f4 shot (becuse it's so dreamy), and the J9 at f4 (because is's sooo sharp)
__________________
Ondrej [on-the-ray]


My current favorite: M6 + CV40 | Also using: CV 15/4.5, CV 28/3.5, CV 28/1.9, Leitz 90/2.8, Canon 50/1.4, J-3 50/1.5
(And some Olympus OM cameras and lenses )
My 10 best @ RFF | My Flickr Gallery | Jupiters rule! on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #8
nikola
Registered User
 
nikola's Avatar
 
nikola is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Split, Croatia
Age: 26
Posts: 460
nice job, the last one also looks nice
__________________
snap's @ flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #9
Pherdinand
5000 & call it a day!
 
Pherdinand's Avatar
 
Pherdinand is offline
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: er gaat niets boven groningen.
Age: 32
Posts: 6,495
your model is indeed beautiful! It must be a pleasure to test your equipment on such a "subject".
__________________
Happy New Year, Happy New Continent!
eye contact eye
My RFF Foolery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #10
Valkir1987
The Photographing Bard
 
Valkir1987's Avatar
 
Valkir1987 is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 22
Posts: 200
How badly is this Jupiter scratched? I have an Industar 50 on my Zorki with some scratches on it, havent really tested it yet. I know one spot ore scratch doesnt matter much, but the almost new Industar 50 on my zenit seems to be better.
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #11
xayraa33
rangefinder user and fancier
 
xayraa33's Avatar
 
xayraa33 is offline
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,525
the I- 61 has preformed very nicely.
__________________
My Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #12
Silva Lining
CanoHasseLeica
 
Silva Lining's Avatar
 
Silva Lining is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Awld Lahdahn Tahn
Age: 36
Posts: 857
This is a great test Spyderman, I like the Jupiter 9 at f4 best. To my eye, the Industar 61 is sharper than the Jupiter 8 but the Jupiter has nicer Bokeh! Which was your favourite?
__________________
------------------------
Phill

My Gallery
Currently Shooting - Leica M6 + Zeiss Planar 50/2 Ultron 28/2- PanF
In the bag - Hasselblad 503Cxi + Distagon 60/3.5 + TriX
Olympus E-P1 and Summilux 50/1.4
My PBase Gallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #13
Ash
Selflessly Self-involved
 
Ash's Avatar
 
Ash is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,223
brilliant comparison. Much thanks
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #14
StuartR
Registered User
 
StuartR's Avatar
 
StuartR is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland
Age: 31
Posts: 1,369
I really liked the Industar 61! It has a really nice character to it. It is sharpish, but the way it renders her face is really nice.
__________________
That's my website. You may like it.
www.stuartrichardson.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #15
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Quote:
It must be a pleasure to test your equipment on such a "subject".
It surely is

Quote:
How badly is this Jupiter scratched?
Imagine giving a lens to a child, to play with it in the sand. That kind of damage is very close to reality. The front element is just like cleaned with sandpaper It's a '61 silver example, and has only 3 (!) aperture blades instead of 9. The rest was removed by previous owner

Quote:
Which was your favourite?
I think the Jupiter 85 is an absolutely gorgeous lens. Also very underrated. The shots at f2 were not very satisfying, but at f4 it's just sooo sharp.

I also notices that Sonnar type lenses tend to give out-of-focus highlights with stronger edges when wide open. When stopped down by one stop, the out-of-focus highlights just smoothen out.

The Jupiter 8 has this "classic Sonnar" look of out-of-focus highlights at f2 and f2.8 in corners.
But in the 50mm range I prefer the look of the Industar 61. Already at f2.8 it's so sharp (notice the picture). I like that picture, becuse of the shallow DOF - only her face and some hairs are in focus! Wow!
__________________
Ondrej [on-the-ray]


My current favorite: M6 + CV40 | Also using: CV 15/4.5, CV 28/3.5, CV 28/1.9, Leitz 90/2.8, Canon 50/1.4, J-3 50/1.5
(And some Olympus OM cameras and lenses )
My 10 best @ RFF | My Flickr Gallery | Jupiters rule! on Flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-09-2006   #16
leica M2 fan
Jazz and Blues
 
leica M2 fan's Avatar
 
leica M2 fan is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Wonderful Nor Cal
Posts: 5,821
I agree the f4 shot on the scratched Jupiter is VERY nice and the J-9 at
f2 and f4 are absolutely great.
__________________
Good Light and Good Luck
Tony
l Canon 7s l Leica M2 l Olympus OM4 l Rolleiflex 3.5 F l Nikon S2 l Kiev 4aM l Exakta Varex VX l Nikon F100
.
MyGallery
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #17
lubitel
Registered User
 
lubitel's Avatar
 
lubitel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,244
Nice test! Its funny I just did a similar test with my wife as a subject, comparing different lenses. Havent posted it yet though. And those shots with a scratched lens look really good! I got try it on a J-3... or may be not.
__________________
http://www.yevglad.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #18
Macpod
Registered User
 
Macpod is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 119
Leica glow! ahahaha. cant resist. 3 aperture blades eh. damn
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #19
fidget
Lemon magnet
 
fidget's Avatar
 
fidget is online now
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Northern England
Posts: 1,057
Nice tests, thanks for posting.
Do you know if it's the scratches which gives such a large change in the colour rendition of the J8 (scratched) images?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #20
pcfranchina
Registered User
 
pcfranchina's Avatar
 
pcfranchina is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 315
Definetly impressed with the I61. I never use mine. Anyone ever use them with a Bessa?
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #21
ampguy
Registered User
 
ampguy's Avatar
 
ampguy is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,391
I like both the I61 and Jupiter. I think your "scratched" Jupiter may have also been dropped, kicked, hazed, and fungusized

fwiw, the I61 has some attributes of the rokkor 40/2.
__________________
My photo blog

  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #22
brachal
Refrigerated User
 
brachal's Avatar
 
brachal is offline
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: New Orleans, La
Age: 41
Posts: 904
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcfranchina
Definetly impressed with the I61. I never use mine. Anyone ever use them with a Bessa?
The I61 is my "go to" 50mm. I love the sharpness and contrast. I'm waiting to get the first roll shot with my new Jupiter-3 back; we'll see if I still feel the same after that!

The I61 gives great results on my Bessa R. This is one of my favorites with that combo:

http://www.rangefinderforum.com/phot...00&ppuser=2935
__________________
Bill

My Gallery

Me on flickr

"Living in fear is just another way of dying before your time." DBT
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #23
lubitel
Registered User
 
lubitel's Avatar
 
lubitel is offline
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: germany
Posts: 1,244
I have 2 or 3 I-61s and all of them are way off with focus on my Bessa R

But I like J-3 and J-8
__________________
http://www.yevglad.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-10-2006   #24
morgan
Registered User
 
morgan's Avatar
 
morgan is offline
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Cambridge, Ma.
Posts: 576
[quote=brachal]The I61 is my "go to" 50mm. I love the sharpness and contrast. I'm waiting to get the first roll shot with my new Jupiter-3 back; we'll see if I still feel the same after that!

I'm awaiting my first roll back with my bessa-r and I61. I also just got a j-3 (from Yuri) and I got some shots back yesterday, I only took a few with it, but they came back great. It's a nice lens.

I feel like my I61 is a little softer than the j-3, it has a great feel to it. The j-3 is more versatile. Which I take with me will probably depend on conditions.
__________________
R2A, R-D1, bessa-r, fed 5, yashica gsn, kiev 4

RFF gallery
My flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 07-11-2006   #25
Spyderman
Ondrej P.
 
Spyderman's Avatar
 
Spyderman is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Bratislava, Slovakia
Age: 25
Posts: 1,300
Please, don't scratch your lenses if you want some 'Jupiter glow' Buy a cheap 'softener' or 'cross/star' filter instead, or maybe make your own by scratching a cheap UV

On the other hand, if you already have a scratched lens - don't be afraid to use it It might give you some interesting results - just like mine.
__________________
Ondrej [on-the-ray]


My current favorite: M6 + CV40 | Also using: CV 15/4.5, CV 28/3.5, CV 28/1.9, Leitz 90/2.8, Canon 50/1.4, J-3 50/1.5
(And some Olympus OM cameras and lenses )
My 10 best @ RFF | My Flickr Gallery | Jupiters rule! on Flickr
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Leica/FSU lens focusing incompatability Paul Connet Rangefinder Photography Discussion 9 02-01-2006 20:19
Good place to start: FSU 35 & 50? JoshRoot FSU Former Soviet Union RF 4 01-22-2006 19:02
Good & Cheap LTM lenses? wlewisiii Rangefinder Photography Discussion 34 10-25-2005 16:51
Mike Johnson's liteny of lenses <g> Rick Beckrich Rangefinder Photography Discussion 28 09-20-2005 23:13
R3A for wide angle lenses nils Cosina Voigtlander Bessa 13 05-26-2005 02:35



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 14:57.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.