Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Classic Pan film - has anyone used it?
Old 06-12-2006   #1
jrong
Too many cameras
 
jrong's Avatar
 
jrong is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 252
Classic Pan film - has anyone used it?

So has anyone tried this Classic Pan film?
It's supposed to have a high silver content and produce a 1950's look -- if anyone can tell me what that means exactly, I'll be very grateful. Retrophotographic said their last batch sold out very quickly, and so that means there must be someone out there with sample scans, at least.

Any samples to show?

Jin
__________________
ArtemisWorks Photography
http://www.artemisworks.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2006   #2
clarence
ダメ
 
clarence's Avatar
 
clarence is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Singapore
Posts: 984
If I recall correctly, it lacks an anti-halation layer, which leads to some low level fogging that was common in the film of the bad old days.

I haven't used it before though, so I should shut up.

Clarence
__________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/clarence/

You can also find some photos here

and here

http://del.icio.us/clarence

Like women, cameras can be savoured just because they are beautiful.

Last edited by clarence : 06-12-2006 at 12:12.
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2006   #3
drmatthes
Zeiss Addict
 
drmatthes's Avatar
 
drmatthes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lueneburg, Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 145
I have been using Classic 400 (which is supposed to be the same as Fortepan 400, i.e. from Hungary) in my Minox 35 GL P&S for some time. At 400 ASA I was disappointed, everything seemed to be bleached, low overall contrast. Then I remembered that, on the fotoimpex.de website, they stated that it was a red-light susceptible film, good for low-light situations, and I took good pictures in available light situations (Jazz concerts in bars and clubs in Berlin), and I had it pushed to ASA 800. Pretty good contrast, grain still low, excellent results. Didn't scan any so far, sorry for that, but if you bear that in mind (that it is a film which is "superpanchromatic") - just push it one stop, and you'll be more than satisfied!

Jesko
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2006   #4
kaiyen
local man of mystery
 
kaiyen's Avatar
 
kaiyen is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 34
Posts: 2,204
That's weird re: classic/fortepan 400. I had really good results shot at 320 in id-11.

anyway. no help on classic pan 100.

allan
__________________
My Photo Blog
flickr me
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-12-2006   #5
drmatthes
Zeiss Addict
 
drmatthes's Avatar
 
drmatthes is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Lueneburg, Germany
Age: 47
Posts: 145
I must add that this one seems to me a film that has been made for the crazy bunch of people who, apart from T-flat crystal 1600-3200 ASA films, like to do it the old available light way. Tried to push Tri-X as well, for the "old look". Much more grain. Classic 400 was better!

That is to say, I am an amateur, had them developed at Fuji's, Germany, no idea what soup they used.

Jesko
  Reply With Quote

Old 06-13-2006   #6
jrong
Too many cameras
 
jrong's Avatar
 
jrong is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 252
Thanks for the feedback, Jesko. Sounds like a good ISO 800 film to try in that case. If anyone else has any ideas about development, pls share your experiences.

Jin
__________________
ArtemisWorks Photography
http://www.artemisworks.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 09-06-2006   #7
Peter S
Registered User
 
Peter S is offline
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Amsterdam
Age: 43
Posts: 285
Hi,

I have been experimenting with Classicpan 200 and 400 and just posted my initial results. Do not know how to link to a thread, but search for " classicpan" and it will pop up. Sofar I liked it best in Xtol 1+1 . Hope to have time soon to take it for a stroll outside. Will then upload some of the results. Not sure yet, but I think I will like it, it will never replace Tri X, but it is a lot cheaper and seems to have a character of it's own.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A digital dude's first experience of film rangefinders hinius Rangefinder Photography Discussion 30 05-18-2006 06:08
The wa of film John Camp Rangefinder Photography Discussion 39 03-17-2006 02:02
Film suggestions for a Holga? DaShiv Lomo / Diana / Holga / Pinhole / Polaroids 12 03-13-2006 02:07
Last Distro of Agfa Film & Paper - Canadians Take Note bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 3 01-13-2006 10:55
Fujicolor to close film processing plant bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 29 11-08-2005 17:33



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 21:59.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.