| Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum. |
 |
Rangefinder Fungus Zapper 2000 |
 |
05-27-2006
|
#1
|
|
got hardware, need skills
akptc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 2 km east from perpetual dehydration
Posts: 1,626
|
Rangefinder Fungus Zapper 2000
I need some - a lens I received in the mail has a faint smell that I am afraid might mean future fungus if left untreated. Visual inspection under a loupe shows nothing but perfect glass and not a trace of fungus or even dust. While this hint of a foreign smell could be the result of the lens heaving spent some time wrapped in a protective cloth (the same smell), I want to make sure fungus does not happen to it.
Is there is an effective and simple way to treat or store the lens now that I have it, to make sure that fungus, if present, is dead for sure?
I've looked at light boxes but those are yet another piece of hardware to clutter my office. I am hoping to find a "Rangefinder Fungus Zapper 2000" in a bottle (or spray, ideally  )
Thanks for any advice.
__________________
Andy K
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#2
|
|
Lord of Broken Toys
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
|
Ultraviolet light kills many fungi, and G-Man is right, plenty of that in sunlight. Many people put their lenses on a window sill where it will get direct sunlight and leave it there for several days. Indoors, of course.
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#3
|
|
got hardware, need skills
akptc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 2 km east from perpetual dehydration
Posts: 1,626
|
Dave, Bill - thank you, I was hoping it was as simple as that. Well, for once I will appreciate the (blazing) Arizona sunshine 
__________________
Andy K
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#4
|
|
Lord of Broken Toys
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by akptc
Dave, Bill - thank you, I was hoping it was as simple as that. Well, for once I will appreciate the (blazing) Arizona sunshine 
|
Some people also wrap the lens in aluminum foil before putting it in the window to bake in the sun, but I need all my aluminum foil for my special hats. I always have to remember to cut out the eyeholes, or I'm bumping into furniture again.
http://www.popphoto.com/article.asp?...7&print_page=y
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#5
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
A beneficent providence *and* aluminium foil?
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#6
|
|
got hardware, need skills
akptc is offline
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: 2 km east from perpetual dehydration
Posts: 1,626
|
Cool! I use my aluminum foil to fry eggs on my driveway, about 3 min for overeasy. And now I can fry my lenses too...
__________________
Andy K
|
|
|
|
05-27-2006
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
sf is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,842
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bmattock
Some people also wrap the lens in aluminum foil before putting it in the window to bake in the sun, but I need all my aluminum foil for my special hats. I always have to remember to cut out the eyeholes, or I'm bumping into furniture again.
http://www.popphoto.com/article.asp?...7&print_page=y
Best Regards,
Bill Mattocks
|
but wouldn't that negate the UV effect? - on the lens, I mean.
|
|
|
|
05-28-2006
|
#8
|
|
Seasoned Member
Dougg is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Washington state
Posts: 1,030
|
George I think the logic of the foil is to reflect the sun's UV back through the lens for another pass, and accelerate the effect. One places the lens on a sheet of foil, say on a windowsill, and facing the lens toward the sun... I suppose it might not be too bad an idea in addition to fold the foil up around the barrel of a black-finish lens in hopes that would keep it from getting overly warm.
|
|
|
|
05-28-2006
|
#9
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
So the wrapping is partial, in the form of a tube. That makes sense.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
05-29-2006
|
#10
|
|
RFF Sponsoring Member
RJBender is offline
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,601
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dougg
George I think the logic of the foil is to reflect the sun's UV back through the lens for another pass, and accelerate the effect. One places the lens on a sheet of foil, say on a windowsill, and facing the lens toward the sun... I suppose it might not be too bad an idea in addition to fold the foil up around the barrel of a black-finish lens in hopes that would keep it from getting overly warm.
|
What about the possibility of the grease in the lens helical migrating to the lens diaphragm ?
R.J.
|
|
|
|
05-29-2006
|
#11
|
|
Seasoned Member
Dougg is offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Central Washington state
Posts: 1,030
|
Good reason to keep the lens cool whilst irradiating the glass (wide open)!
|
|
|
|
05-30-2006
|
#12
|
|
a.k.a. Mukul Dube
payasam is offline
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delhi, India
Age: 62
Posts: 4,860
|
Time, perhaps, to move to a discussion of the thermal conductivity of different kinds of optical glass.
__________________
"Payasam" means a sloppy pudding. Little kids love it, and I'm a little kid with a big grey beard and diabetes.
Film: M6, M2, Ultron 35/1.7, M-Hexanon 50/2,Elmarit 90/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5, Canon 100/3.5, Jupiter 8
Digital: Olympus E-300, E-510 and E-3 with 4 Zuiko Digital lenses
RFF gallery
Flickr gallery
|
|
|
|
05-30-2006
|
#13
|
|
Happy Snapper
kully is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 2,556
|
I'm also looking for this device, before I send my camera off for a good scrubbing by a camera repair bloke.
Is the advice given above the same for non-lens-changeable cameras? My GTN is showing a little fungus behind the edges of the front element, I don't want to leave it on the window sill just in case the heat damages the (admittedly metal) shutters behind.
|
|
|
|
05-30-2006
|
#14
|
|
Lord of Broken Toys
bmattock is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 10,201
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by RJBender
What about the possibility of the grease in the lens helical migrating to the lens diaphragm ?
|
Tougher emigration laws.
__________________
Immanentizing the eschaton since 1987.
|
|
|
|
06-05-2006
|
#15
|
|
Happy Snapper
kully is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Location: England
Age: 34
Posts: 2,556
|
Cheers g'man.
I took apart my Jupiter-8 on Sunday to practice before destroying the GTN. Took it apart fine, cleaned it up with some lens solution and a microfibre cloth but putting it back toghther and looking through it I can now see a myriad of dust specks on the elements that were exposed to the air.
The room I took it apart in is hoovered twice a week, but it does have carpet...
Should I have taken more care (doing it in the bathroom?) or is my room just plain dusty?
|
|
|
|
06-05-2006
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
David Murphy is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pasadena, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 2,383
|
My guess is that in the dry SW where you live (Arizona), the fungus will not grow. Old lenses I get from tropical or temperate places much more often have fungus or early signs of it. My camera tech has removed fungus and haze on most lenses (CLA) where I had the issue for about $50 -- puts 'em back to almost new condition. Of course the lens must be worth somewhat more than this to make it worthwhile.
|
|
|
|
06-05-2006
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
rvaubel is offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Berkeley,Ca
Posts: 789
|
Bathrooms are a good place to assemble cleaned lenses. Especially after running the shower for a bit to steam up the room. That will knock down the dust. After a half hour or so the humidity should return to normal which, in the SF bay area is around 50% and doesnt seem to result in fungus. This may be a bad idea in the tropics.
Rex
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 13:48. |
|
|