Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > 35mm Film Range Finders > Zeiss Contax

Zeiss Contax Forum for the classic Zeiss Contax I, II, III, IIa, IIIa , G series, and if you want to push it, the nice Contax point and shoots. Some spill over from the Kievs, the Soviet copy of the Contax II/III can also be expected. Plus the ONLY production camera ever made in classic Zeiss Contax Rangefinder mount WITH TTL metering ... the Voigtlander Bessa R2C.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

DX coding weirdness
Old 05-22-2006   #1
jrong
Too many cameras
 
jrong's Avatar
 
jrong is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 252
DX coding weirdness

I have an unusual problem here. I have been on holiday, and have been shooting with my Contax G2 and rolls of Fuji Neopan 100 film. One afternoon, I stuck in a roll of APX 100 film and shot with my 21mm lens and viewfinder, and did not peer through the actual camera viewfinder until most of the roll was used up.

When I did look through the viewfinder though, I noticed that the metering was funky... it was showing a shutter speed of 1/6000 for a bright sunny scene at f4 or so. I was shocked at this. I checked the top of the camera display and it read "DX" as it has always done - but when I checked the ISO setting by pressing the ISO button, it read "2500", whereas it should only have been 100!

I guess I should really have checked, but I'd always trusted my cameras to read the DX properly.... and a further snag was that I was using my 21mm viewfinder and not the camera viewfinder so I did not notice any odd metering readings until it was too late.

So I took out the APX film and put in a fresh roll of Neopan 100. The DX reading was correct this time, at a 100.

I'm stumped - the batteries are fresh-ish, I replaced them about 4-5 rolls of film ago, a few months back. Has anyone experienced similar weirdness with their G2 cameras?

Any way I can realistically salvage a roll of ISO 100 film shot at ISO 2500?? (It is Agfa APX 100... not sure how much it can be pushed without resulting in golfball grain).
__________________
ArtemisWorks Photography
http://www.artemisworks.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2006   #2
kaiyen
local man of mystery
 
kaiyen's Avatar
 
kaiyen is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Age: 34
Posts: 2,204
is it possible that there was some dirt or something either on the film canister or on the contacts in your...contax?

also, perhaps the coding was tarnished or damaged on the film canister. that happens if you've had it rolling around outside of its plastic case thingy.

I am not articulate today.

allan
__________________
My Photo Blog
flickr me
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2006   #3
jrong
Too many cameras
 
jrong's Avatar
 
jrong is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 252
The film was fresh from a canister, so no there was no dirt, nor any scratches. I had a look at the DX coding for ISO 100 and 2500, and for the camera to have made this mistake, it should've detected 2 contacts where there weren't any. This is odd because you'd think that the opposite was a more likely thing to have happened.

Does the camera check the DX coding on the canister every time you turn the camera on, or only once when you load the film?
__________________
ArtemisWorks Photography
http://www.artemisworks.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2006   #4
Socke
Registered User
 
Socke is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,920
Hm, I think the DX contacts are nothing more than electrical switches which are eiter open or closed. So every time the camera is switched there is electricity on the closed contacts an non at the open ones.
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2006   #5
ClaremontPhoto
Jon Claremont
 
ClaremontPhoto's Avatar
 
ClaremontPhoto is offline
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Alentejo
Posts: 5,341
Tell the lab what happened. You are not the first. See what they can salvage,
__________________
.

R.I.P. 2009

Jon


ClaremontPhoto


Box of Chocolates
A Gray Area
Panoramic
Friends & Neighbors



"I like long walks, especially when they are taken by people who annoy me." Noel Coward
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-22-2006   #6
jrong
Too many cameras
 
jrong's Avatar
 
jrong is offline
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 252
I develop my own film. Was just wondering whether I should develop for 2500 (and hope for the best) or develop normally and assume that the camera's DX setting went haywire only towards the end of the roll, so most frames can be salvaged. It's a bit of a gamble....
__________________
ArtemisWorks Photography
http://www.artemisworks.co.uk
  Reply With Quote

Old 05-24-2006   #7
Che Hale
Registered User
 
Che Hale is offline
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 6
You could do a test strip from the beginning. It would tell you if it messed up mid roll or at the beginning.

Che.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Some Zorki 4 Weirdness: Ideas? Max Power FSU Former Soviet Union RF 2 04-18-2006 06:40
Weirdness with my XA... Buttershug Rangefinder Photography Discussion 6 02-26-2006 12:44
Minolta 5400 - mac-related weirdness broadie Image Processing: Darkroom / Lightroom / Film 3 01-15-2006 10:19
Member gallery weirdness SalmanA Rangefinder Photography Discussion 6 12-16-2005 10:06
Has DX Coding changed? Allen Gilman Rangefinder Photography Discussion 12 07-12-2005 11:47



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:38.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.