Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Digital Rangefinder Cameras > Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF

Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF A dedicated forum to the first Digital rangefinder camera.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Time for an Epson R-D1 forum?
Old 12-03-2004   #1
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Time for an Epson R-D1 forum?

I got my R-D1 today. The battery is still charging, so I haven't been able to use it yet, but I just had to say something beyond, "Oh, cripes, I'm going to be in hock to Visa for months!"

In fact, since this is the most expensive thing I've ever bought that didn't require license plates, you may have to put up with a lot of posts from me in the near future as I try to rationalize it to myself.

Two immediate thoughts:

1) For those who might have wondered -- NO, you can't see the 28mm frameline if you wear glasses! Not at all. It's perfectly visible if you don't wear glasses.

I do wear glasses, but this doesn't bother me since I don't do a lot of wide-angle shooting; in fact, I'm glad I have an excuse not to trade in my 35/1.7 Ultron for the 28/1.9.

2) Is it time for RFF to add an R-D1 forum? I've seen posts from a couple of other people who have them.

Last edited by jlw : 12-03-2004 at 20:46.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #2
MP Guy
Just another face in the crowd
 
MP Guy's Avatar
 
MP Guy is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,391
Ah.. looks like a good topic for dslrexchange.com

Keep your eyes open on the forum.
__________________
-- Jorge Torralba

Developer of the RFF gallery Software.

My Gallery on Ag2Si - SilverToSilicon
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #3
rover
Moderator
 
rover's Avatar
 
rover is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Connecticut
Age: 47
Posts: 13,862
Cross over product, different than a dslr in my mind.
__________________
Dad with a Camera

Millennium M6TTL with Voigtlander 35/1.2 Nokton

rover's world at flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #4
sfaust
Registered User
 
sfaust's Avatar
 
sfaust is offline
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 512
Isn't it a rangefinder? It appears to fit perfectly on both forums! Why not put one here, and one on dslrexchange.com also.

At least having a separate forum here will help keep the digital aspects in one area for those that aren't that interested in it. Otherwise, it will spill over into all the other forums and threads. Just a thought.
__________________
Stephen
www.StephenFaust.com
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #5
Gordon Coale
Registered User
 
Gordon Coale's Avatar
 
Gordon Coale is offline
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Whidbey Island -- north of Seattle
Age: 68
Posts: 766
The RD-1 is a rangefinder - *not* an SLR. It takes those crazy Leica M mount and screw mount lenses (rangefinder lenses, one and all.)
__________________
What I am currently shooting:
35mm: Leica M3, Tower/Nicca 5L, Bessa R, 1935 Leica Standard, Nikon F
Medium Format: Bronica SQ-A
Digital: Pansonic GH3, Olympus E-PM1
gordy's camera straps for sale * my blog * my flickr * my feedback
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #6
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally posted by Jorge Torralba
Ah.. looks like a good topic for dslrexchange.com

Keep your eyes open on the forum.
Thanks for the quick action! But I agree with those who say the R-D1 belongs here, not on the digital SLR site.

If there's one thing I've learned about the R-D1 already in my few hours of ownership, it is that this is a rangefinder camera first, foremost, far and away; it's only a digital camera very, very incidentally, and of course it's nothing like an SLR at all.

Other than the back-panel LCD -- which you really only need for initial setup and can keep folded out of view the rest of the time -- its user interface shows you nothing digital, and barely anything even "electronic" (just the shutter-speed readouts in the finder and a data-write LED on one end.)

In fact, if you could convince yourself that 35mm film now comes in small, rectangular packets that you load into a slot at one end of the camera body, using the R-D1 would be almost exactly like using a C/V Bessa -- except that the film advance lever throw is shorter.

Still haven't had time to size up the images, but so far I'm really liking the way the camera handles.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #7
GallenWolf
Registered User
 
GallenWolf is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 16
That's way cool! From what I hear, this product will NOT be available in my country. That sucks. I am wondering though, if it's still possible to get good slides out of a film recorder in combination with the rd1...

Alvin
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=760'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #8
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally posted by GallenWolf
That's way cool! From what I hear, this product will NOT be available in my country. That sucks.
I'll bet B&H or Calumet would sell you one anyway... ;-)

Quote:
I am wondering though, if it's still possible to get good slides out of a film recorder in combination with the rd1...
I dunno -- we got rid of our film recorder at work a couple of years ago, so I wouldn't have any way to test it. There's no reason the images wouldn't be as good as what you'd get from the same process via a DSLR.

But, I can't help wondering what's the point -- from what I remember, there's already a well-proven technology for making slides that does NOT require the use of a film recorder... ;-)
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #9
GallenWolf
Registered User
 
GallenWolf is offline
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Singapore
Posts: 16
I can think of a reason! B&W slides! There is no place in singapore that can process Agfa Scala! I would sure love to get B&W slides that don't need a trip across the oceans just for processing

But seriously, what I really enjoy from my shots is viewing them on a lightbox with a loupe, not on screen. So... if I had a digital RF, I would love to burn 'em to slides

Alvin
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-03-2004   #10
RML
Just live it.
 
RML's Avatar
 
RML is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Holland or Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Age: 43
Posts: 4,840
You could always print them on those plastic presentation sheets! That'll give A4-sized "slides"....
__________________
My photo blog

Join the Rangefinder Blog/Site Ring.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2004   #11
Designer
Keven
 
Designer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 45
Posts: 460
Congratulations! Jlw.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-04-2004   #12
Designer
Keven
 
Designer is offline
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Hong Kong
Age: 45
Posts: 460
Quote:
Originally posted by RML
You could always print them on those plastic presentation sheets! That'll give A4-sized "slides"....
Interesting idea! And we could duplicate more by photo copier.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-05-2004   #13
RML
Just live it.
 
RML's Avatar
 
RML is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Amsterdam, Holland or Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
Age: 43
Posts: 4,840
Did I just find out we have a new forum here on RFF?

We have a RD-1 forum!

I'm just wondering how many of us will actually end up with one. Availability and price seem to be limiting the spread of this camera.
__________________
My photo blog

Join the Rangefinder Blog/Site Ring.
  Reply With Quote

R-D1 Review
Old 12-07-2004   #14
sreidvt
Registered User
 
sreidvt is offline
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 371
R-D1 Review

In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen it yet, my review of the R-D1 is at <http://luminous-landscape.com/review...pson-rd1.shtml>

Part 2 will be a test of ten lenses on the R-D1.

Cheers,

Sean Reid
  Reply With Quote

Re: R-D1 Review
Old 12-07-2004   #15
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Re: R-D1 Review

Quote:
Originally posted by sreidvt
In case anyone is interested and hasn't seen it yet, my review of the R-D1 is at <http://luminous-landscape.com/review...pson-rd1.shtml>

Part 2 will be a test of ten lenses on the R-D1.

Cheers,

Sean Reid
This is an excellent review, all. Among other things, it's where I picked up the trick about b&w raw images still having the color data in them.

Also, you can download a PDF version of the full R-D 1 instruction manual (same one that comes with the camera) from Epson UK's support website, by going to the link above and making the appropriate choices (choose "Digital Photo Device" -- ?!?-- as the product range) from the pop-up menus. (I couldn't find the manual on the Epson USA site.)

Between reading the Luminous Landscape review and the manual, you'll know about as much as there is to know about the R-D 1 without actually having to buy one...

Last edited by jlw : 12-07-2004 at 08:26.
  Reply With Quote

Old 12-07-2004   #16
jlw
Rangefinder camera pedant
 
jlw is offline
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,271
Quote:
Originally posted by RML
I'm just wondering how many of us will actually end up with one. Availability and price seem to be limiting the spread of this camera.
The price was quite a hurdle for me... but it's about the same size chunk o' money as a current Leica M, and people still seem to end up with those.

I think that in the long run, the things that limit its spread will be more in the area of finder coverage (c'mon, Epson, only three framelines?) and lens use (lots of people who prefer an RF for wide-angle shooting won't like the 1.53x crop factor of the APS-size sensor.)

It will be interesting to see what the second interchangeable-lens digital RF will be like... assuming there actually IS one! Meanwhile, Epson (and Cosina) deserve to get some props both for doing it first, and for doing it well first...
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #17
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,703
first off, i wonder what ever happened to jim (jlw)?

and for now, who knew then that there would be no rd2 in the works, that leica would make an even more expensive drf and that i would have 2 of my own??

i love the rd1!!!
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #18
sooner
Registered User
 
sooner is offline
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 595
Just curious where you bought yours, and what you paid. I'm getting an itchy trigger finger on one, but wondering where best to look for a good condition one from a trustworthy source. Thanks.
__________________
<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=1354'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #19
back alley
ɹoʇɐɹǝpoɯ moderator
 
back alley's Avatar
 
back alley is offline
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: canada
Age: 62
Posts: 34,703
i got one from tony rose, it was a consignment camera so i paid more for it.
and i got one from a former rff member but on another photo site.
if i average them out i paid 1450 each.
__________________
what can i say?

heart soul and a camera
flickr

x-pro1...x-e1...8...14...18...27...35...60
rx100
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #20
mgd711
Medium Format Baby!!
 
mgd711's Avatar
 
mgd711 is offline
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Japan and The Philippines
Posts: 664
Its hard to believe it was 5 years ago..... I was still young then, now I'm an old fat man!!

This has to be the only digital camera that has aged well and is still in demand.
__________________
Mike



The Fiery Scotsman

MGD Photography
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #21
Frankie
Speaking Frankly
 
Frankie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 758
Quote:
Originally Posted by back alley View Post

and for now, who knew then that there would be no rd2 in the works, that leica would make an even more expensive drf and that i would have 2 of my own??
Leica is setting themselves up to be busted, just as someone burst their bubble in photogrammetry/orthophoto some 18 years ago...via an all digital system that made their optical/mechanical wonder an open joke.

[That was Wild-Heerbrugg, whose owner also owned Leitz-Wetzler and renamed itself Leica...later renamed again as Leica Geosystem, then ERDAS...]

All Zeiss or CV had to do is to make a full-frame RF body at half the price. The Leica glass myth will bust itself.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #22
BearCatCow
Registered User
 
BearCatCow is offline
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie View Post
All Zeiss or CV had to do is to make a full-frame RF body at half the price. The Leica glass myth will bust itself.
I don't think the technology is quite there yet but when it is... *salivates*

The rumors about the digital Zeiss Ikon ZM has me pretty excited too!

But meanwhile I still love my R-D1 as much as the day I got it. In fact it's so great that I'm really not sure why I am excited about full frame digital RF's at all.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-12-2009   #23
Wallo
Registered User
 
Wallo is offline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 49
Quote:
Originally Posted by BearCatCow View Post
The rumors about the digital Zeiss Ikon ZM has me pretty excited too!
I'm very excited, too, and anticipating the used Ikon market 5 years from the release.

Quote:
But meanwhile I still love my R-D1 as much as the day I got it. In fact it's so great that I'm really not sure why I am excited about full frame digital RF's at all.
I can only second that. The day I got mine is not that far back, but I'm falling in love with the camera over and over again each day. The big difference to any other digital I've owned or used is that I like the camera even when I'm not using it. The day that I will get a film Bessa as a back-up is certainly approaching.
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2009   #24
mabelsound
actually a dude
 
mabelsound's Avatar
 
mabelsound is offline
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Age: 43
Posts: 5,403
Yep, I've had mine for a year now and am still amazed every time I use it. It is a great camera, and unique.
__________________
photoblog, flickr
  Reply With Quote

Old 08-13-2009   #25
Frankie
Speaking Frankly
 
Frankie is offline
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 758
I have been planning a wander-around-the-world trip celebrating my early retirement...soon.

When that day comes, and if nothing else is in sight, I'd simply buy an RD-1 and likely the Elmarit 28mm/2.8 asph...the closest equivalent to my ZM+CV 40mm/1.4 one camera/lens outfit.

Sourcing RD-1 from Japan is not a problem...I bought my ZM that way. AND, if Japan is my first or early stop, simply buy it there...plenty of stock new or used [experience speaking here].

Imagine reviewing picture in an Internet Cafe, e-mailing good pictures home...free at last. And, if no Internet Cafe is handy, buy more SD chips...

I tend to use my plasma TV as my changing gallery. 1920 x 1080 is full screen...a mere 2 Mpixel; and I've got 6 Mp in each shot. My plasma takes an SD chip direct and could even rotate images.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forum Rules MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 26 10-18-2005 01:13
Just a quick hello to the forum :-) Flyfisher Tom Leica M Film Cameras 9 02-18-2005 10:50
Just purchased my Epson R-D1 rangefinder - First imperssions and pictures. driggett Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 14 02-01-2005 15:29
Epson Launches the World's First Rangefinder Digital Camera MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 25 11-17-2004 07:16



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 17:18.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.