Go Back   Rangefinderforum.com > Rangefinder Forum > Rangefinder Photography Discussion

Rangefinder Photography Discussion General discussions about Rangefinder Photography. This is a great place for questions and answers that are not addressed in a specific category. Take note there is also a General Photography forum.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

How do you measure your lens?
Old 10-25-2004   #1
Huck Finn
Registered User
 
Huck Finn is offline
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Connecticut, USA
Posts: 1,949
How do you measure your lens?

After reading about the new Zeiss Ikon line on the internet, I noticed that Zeiss lists longer physical lengths for their lenses than Leica does for corresponding focal lengths in their specs. But when I went to PhotoPlus Expo in New York, I didn't notice much of a difference in most of the lenses that I saw.

So, I measured one of the ZI lenses at the expo. When I got home, I checked the ZI website. My measurements of the full length of the lens from bottom of the lens mount to front glass were the same. However, when I measured my Leica lens, the length from the Leica specs corresponded only to the portion of the lens that protrudes from the camera body, i.e. it didn't include the lens mount. I may have made an error in measurement, but I don't think so.

Oddly, when I measured my Voigtlander 75/2.5, it didn't correspond to either of the 2 measurements. The CV spec matched only the length of the lens protruding from the camera body (i.e. exclusive of lens mount like Leica) but with the lens hood attached.

I'm posting this to get a fact check from you folks & to see if anyone knows about the general industry practice in this respect. This seems like an important piece of information when making a purchasing decision especially if you're not in a position to look at 2 lenses side by side. Many of us value the compact size of our RF lenses, so accurate information is important.

Thanks for the help.
__________________
Zeiss Ikon
Zeiss 35/2 Biogon, Zeiss 50/1.5 C-Sonnar, Rollei 40/2.8 Sonnar, Voigtlander 28/3.5 Skopar, Voigtlander 75/2.5 Heliar


<a href='http://www.rangefinderforum.com/photopost/showgallery.php?cat=500&ppuser=352'>My Gallery</a>
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2004   #2
Doug
Moderator
 
Doug's Avatar
 
Doug is online now
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Posts: 11,154
Interesting observation, Huck. In my view, the important measurements are how far the lens protrudes from the camera body at infinity with and without hood, and perhaps also how far it projects inward toward the shutter if that's by a significant amount. That last might be getting more imiportant these days as a rough guide to its suitability for digital sensors...?

I agree that published measurements should either adhere to some agreed method (preferably), or specify the method used.
__________________
Doug’s Gallery
RFF on Facebook
  Reply With Quote

Old 10-25-2004   #3
Brian Sweeney
Registered User
 
Brian Sweeney's Avatar
 
Brian Sweeney is offline
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,976
It doesn't matter how I measure them; every time the RF's see that Nikon 500mm F4 AF-S they feel inadequate.
  Reply With Quote

Old 01-06-2007   #4
mikeb380
Camera Junky
 
mikeb380's Avatar
 
mikeb380 is offline
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbia, Midlands of South Carolina
Posts: 59
Huck, are you talking about focal length or about physical length of the lens. If physical, the only guide you have is to measure them yourself, there is no standard on that. If it is physical length, there can't be a large variance as the focal length is from the optical center of the front element to the film/sensor plane. Of course some lenses have extra added on, I guess as a lens hood. My 200mm for my EXA has about 2 inches protruding and not collapsible.
Michael
__________________
http://www.tabblo.com/studio/view/tabblos/mikeb380/

Photography: the art of seeing the uncommon in the common.

Zorkii C, 2C, 4, 6
Fed 2, 5A
Zeiss Ikon Nettar 515/2, Nettar 517/16, Baby Ikonta 520/18, Nettar 519/2, Ikonta 520/2
Retina I, Retina IA, Retinette IB
Various Agfa and Agfa Ansco RF
Kiev 3A, Kiko Sumi, Balda Baldette
Kiev 88CC camera & lenses
EOS XT, Sigma 28-80/3.5-5.6 macro, Zenitar 2.8/16mm fisheye
Canon F1, 28mm FD, 200mm FL, Soligor 250mm/4.5, Vivitar 90mm macro
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens Columnation jdos2 Repair / Camera Care 5 11-15-2008 22:45
The most overlooked accessory bmattock Rangefinder Photography Discussion 55 09-24-2006 16:24
R-D1 lens test Sean Reid Digital Epson R-D1 Digital RF 40 01-01-2005 11:50
Fast lens or slow? Doug Rangefinder Photography Discussion 13 12-06-2003 22:23
Mamiya announces 50mm f/4.5 L Lens for M7 MP Guy Rangefinder Photography Discussion 0 07-31-2003 08:34



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 00:43.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content on this site is Copyright Protected and owned by its respective owner. You may link to content on this site but you may not reproduce any of it in whole or part without written consent from its owner.